Shame on NDTV and Barkha Dutt

UPDATED June 2014: At the blogger’s request, his name has been changed to CK instead of his actual name. All links to his blog (and to the cache) have been removed and replaced by underlines.

———-

On India’s Republic Day, blogger CK  published a retraction to a post he did on the irresponsible role of the journalists in the Mumbai attack. I read the original piece and while it was angry, it could hardly be termed libelous (I refrain from quoting from it for CK’s sake, but curious minds might be interested in Google’s cache of the post – scroll to the very bottom).

All over the blogosphere, angry posts were written after the Mumbai attacks–some criticizing the government; and others questioning the media’s role. In tone and content, they did not differ from CK’s piece. It is clear that NDTV is trying to make an example of CK as a warning against future criticism. That is unacceptable. What’s appalling is the very bodies who owe their survival to free speech, the very organizations that used free speech to report on the Mumbai attacks, and defended their content as necessary for information dissemination are now against a blogger’s right to free speech.

Let’s take the following scenario – NDTV and Ms. Barkha Dutt do a piece on someone. Let’s call her A. They tear A to shreds for some reason. Talk about how A didn’t live up to the expectations of her job. Let’s say the piece is a liberal mix of opinion and fact – based on my limited visibility to Ms. Dutt, that’s her modus operandi anyway (which she’s entitled to). Now, let’s say A sues NDTV and Barkha Dutt. What do you presume would happen? Using their huge platform as a national news channel and their vast legal resources, they would fight it. There would be stories on freedom of the press and freedom of speech. There would be righteous stomping around on how the press in India is always maligned blah, blah, blah.

Needless to say, other channels of mainstream media and, of course, bloggers would join NDTV in defending its right of free speech. In fact, all of this happened in the aftermath of the Mumbai attacks where the press in India hoisted a vigorous defense of itself. Excellent, I say – defend yourselves. Excellent – use the right to free speech and stand by your right to report events as they happen.

Now, let’s turn to what they are doing to poor CK1. According to NDTV and Barkha Dutt, he is not entitled to freedom of speech. He’s only a piddly little blogger, so he’s not entitled to the freedom of the press caveat either. Who is he? A poor sod who’s an individual blogger? Well then, throw the entire weight of the NDTV legal staff at him and coerce him into a retraction2.

This is pathetic. This reeks of a double standard so despicable it probably violates some journalistic ethic. There, I said it. Sue me!!

Updated –
Please also read this excellent post by Rohit.
And this hilarious one by Falstaff.


  1. I have not spoken to CK about this. I do not know him. I read his blog on occasion and happened on his retraction 

  2. I have no idea if he was “coerced”, but the verbiage on the retractions is clearly a response to a legal claim – again, I do NOT want to make his life more difficult 

1,166 thoughts on “Shame on NDTV and Barkha Dutt”

  1. Pingback: Beyond Work
  2. Pingback: The Naive Indian
  3. Pingback: vivblogs
  4. Pingback: The Comic Project
  5. Pingback: Abhishek Arora
  6. Pingback: Techdirt
  7. Pingback: dullhaven.com
  8. Pingback: Naveen Eluru
  9. sanjukta says:

    So much has been written based upon an assumption. No body knows why Kunte retracted. More of my thoughts on this to follow.

  10. sanjukta says:

    So much has been written based upon an assumption. No body knows why Kunte retracted. More of my thoughts on this to follow.

  11. sanjukta says:

    So much has been written based upon an assumption. No body knows why Kunte retracted. More of my thoughts on this to follow.

  12. sanjukta says:

    So much has been written based upon an assumption. No body knows why Kunte retracted. More of my thoughts on this to follow.

  13. sanjukta says:

    So much has been written based upon an assumption. No body knows why Kunte retracted. More of my thoughts on this to follow.

  14. sanjukta says:

    So much has been written based upon an assumption. No body knows why Kunte retracted. More of my thoughts on this to follow.

  15. sanjukta says:

    So much has been written based upon an assumption. No body knows why Kunte retracted. More of my thoughts on this to follow.

  16. sanjukta says:

    So much has been written based upon an assumption. No body knows why Kunte retracted. More of my thoughts on this to follow.

  17. sanjukta says:

    So much has been written based upon an assumption. No body knows why Kunte retracted. More of my thoughts on this to follow.

  18. sanjukta says:

    So much has been written based upon an assumption. No body knows why Kunte retracted. More of my thoughts on this to follow.

  19. Shripriya says:

    Well, the language on his retraction makes it clear it was in response to a legal action of some kind. The language was likely mandated by NDTV. Otherwise why would a blogger retract using those terms?

  20. Shripriya says:

    Well, the language on his retraction makes it clear it was in response to a legal action of some kind. The language was likely mandated by NDTV. Otherwise why would a blogger retract using those terms?

  21. Shripriya says:

    Well, the language on his retraction makes it clear it was in response to a legal action of some kind. The language was likely mandated by NDTV. Otherwise why would a blogger retract using those terms?

  22. Shripriya says:

    Well, the language on his retraction makes it clear it was in response to a legal action of some kind. The language was likely mandated by NDTV. Otherwise why would a blogger retract using those terms?

  23. Shripriya says:

    Well, the language on his retraction makes it clear it was in response to a legal action of some kind. The language was likely mandated by NDTV. Otherwise why would a blogger retract using those terms?

  24. Shripriya says:

    Well, the language on his retraction makes it clear it was in response to a legal action of some kind. The language was likely mandated by NDTV. Otherwise why would a blogger retract using those terms?

  25. Shripriya says:

    Well, the language on his retraction makes it clear it was in response to a legal action of some kind. The language was likely mandated by NDTV. Otherwise why would a blogger retract using those terms?

  26. Shripriya says:

    Well, the language on his retraction makes it clear it was in response to a legal action of some kind. The language was likely mandated by NDTV. Otherwise why would a blogger retract using those terms?

  27. Shripriya says:

    Well, the language on his retraction makes it clear it was in response to a legal action of some kind. The language was likely mandated by NDTV. Otherwise why would a blogger retract using those terms?

  28. Shripriya says:

    Well, the language on his retraction makes it clear it was in response to a legal action of some kind. The language was likely mandated by NDTV. Otherwise why would a blogger retract using those terms?

  29. basskeyz says:

    He states in his blog that this was a means of settlement with Barkha Dutt – sounds like somebody from NDTV was after him.
    http://ckunte.com/archives/withdrawal

  30. basskeyz says:

    He states in his blog that this was a means of settlement with Barkha Dutt – sounds like somebody from NDTV was after him.
    http://ckunte.com/archives/withdrawal

  31. basskeyz says:

    He states in his blog that this was a means of settlement with Barkha Dutt – sounds like somebody from NDTV was after him.
    http://ckunte.com/archives/withdrawal

  32. basskeyz says:

    He states in his blog that this was a means of settlement with Barkha Dutt – sounds like somebody from NDTV was after him.
    http://ckunte.com/archives/withdrawal

  33. basskeyz says:

    He states in his blog that this was a means of settlement with Barkha Dutt – sounds like somebody from NDTV was after him.
    http://ckunte.com/archives/withdrawal

  34. basskeyz says:

    He states in his blog that this was a means of settlement with Barkha Dutt – sounds like somebody from NDTV was after him.
    http://ckunte.com/archives/withdrawal

  35. basskeyz says:

    He states in his blog that this was a means of settlement with Barkha Dutt – sounds like somebody from NDTV was after him.
    http://ckunte.com/archives/withdrawal

  36. basskeyz says:

    He states in his blog that this was a means of settlement with Barkha Dutt – sounds like somebody from NDTV was after him.
    http://ckunte.com/archives/withdrawal

  37. basskeyz says:

    He states in his blog that this was a means of settlement with Barkha Dutt – sounds like somebody from NDTV was after him.
    http://ckunte.com/archives/withdrawal

  38. basskeyz says:

    He states in his blog that this was a means of settlement with Barkha Dutt – sounds like somebody from NDTV was after him.
    http://ckunte.com/archives/withdrawal

  39. moinky says:

    We must fight this.
    This might be just one small case, but if we lose this we will lose the War to these douche journos & corporates.
    Barkha Dutt has become embarrassing & intolerable.

    We are with Cheytanya.

  40. moinky says:

    We must fight this.
    This might be just one small case, but if we lose this we will lose the War to these douche journos & corporates.
    Barkha Dutt has become embarrassing & intolerable.

    We are with Cheytanya.

  41. moinky says:

    We must fight this.
    This might be just one small case, but if we lose this we will lose the War to these douche journos & corporates.
    Barkha Dutt has become embarrassing & intolerable.

    We are with Cheytanya.

  42. moinky says:

    We must fight this.
    This might be just one small case, but if we lose this we will lose the War to these douche journos & corporates.
    Barkha Dutt has become embarrassing & intolerable.

    We are with Cheytanya.

  43. moinky says:

    We must fight this.
    This might be just one small case, but if we lose this we will lose the War to these douche journos & corporates.
    Barkha Dutt has become embarrassing & intolerable.

    We are with Cheytanya.

  44. moinky says:

    We must fight this.
    This might be just one small case, but if we lose this we will lose the War to these douche journos & corporates.
    Barkha Dutt has become embarrassing & intolerable.

    We are with Cheytanya.

  45. moinky says:

    We must fight this.
    This might be just one small case, but if we lose this we will lose the War to these douche journos & corporates.
    Barkha Dutt has become embarrassing & intolerable.

    We are with Cheytanya.

  46. moinky says:

    We must fight this.
    This might be just one small case, but if we lose this we will lose the War to these douche journos & corporates.
    Barkha Dutt has become embarrassing & intolerable.

    We are with Cheytanya.

  47. moinky says:

    We must fight this.
    This might be just one small case, but if we lose this we will lose the War to these douche journos & corporates.
    Barkha Dutt has become embarrassing & intolerable.

    We are with Cheytanya.

  48. moinky says:

    We must fight this.
    This might be just one small case, but if we lose this we will lose the War to these douche journos & corporates.
    Barkha Dutt has become embarrassing & intolerable.

    We are with Cheytanya.

  49. Exactly my thoughts. The English news media is not as objective as we want them to be, but with this, NDTV has scaled new heights. What is even more hypocritical is that Barkha Dutt anchors the show “We, the people”, the first words of the preamble to our constitution.

    And we were worried about MNS and Sri Rama Sene.

  50. Exactly my thoughts. The English news media is not as objective as we want them to be, but with this, NDTV has scaled new heights. What is even more hypocritical is that Barkha Dutt anchors the show “We, the people”, the first words of the preamble to our constitution.

    And we were worried about MNS and Sri Rama Sene.

  51. Exactly my thoughts. The English news media is not as objective as we want them to be, but with this, NDTV has scaled new heights. What is even more hypocritical is that Barkha Dutt anchors the show “We, the people”, the first words of the preamble to our constitution.

    And we were worried about MNS and Sri Rama Sene.

  52. Exactly my thoughts. The English news media is not as objective as we want them to be, but with this, NDTV has scaled new heights. What is even more hypocritical is that Barkha Dutt anchors the show “We, the people”, the first words of the preamble to our constitution.

    And we were worried about MNS and Sri Rama Sene.

  53. Exactly my thoughts. The English news media is not as objective as we want them to be, but with this, NDTV has scaled new heights. What is even more hypocritical is that Barkha Dutt anchors the show “We, the people”, the first words of the preamble to our constitution.

    And we were worried about MNS and Sri Rama Sene.

  54. Exactly my thoughts. The English news media is not as objective as we want them to be, but with this, NDTV has scaled new heights. What is even more hypocritical is that Barkha Dutt anchors the show “We, the people”, the first words of the preamble to our constitution.

    And we were worried about MNS and Sri Rama Sene.

  55. Exactly my thoughts. The English news media is not as objective as we want them to be, but with this, NDTV has scaled new heights. What is even more hypocritical is that Barkha Dutt anchors the show “We, the people”, the first words of the preamble to our constitution.

    And we were worried about MNS and Sri Rama Sene.

  56. Exactly my thoughts. The English news media is not as objective as we want them to be, but with this, NDTV has scaled new heights. What is even more hypocritical is that Barkha Dutt anchors the show “We, the people”, the first words of the preamble to our constitution.

    And we were worried about MNS and Sri Rama Sene.

  57. Exactly my thoughts. The English news media is not as objective as we want them to be, but with this, NDTV has scaled new heights. What is even more hypocritical is that Barkha Dutt anchors the show “We, the people”, the first words of the preamble to our constitution.

    And we were worried about MNS and Sri Rama Sene.

  58. Exactly my thoughts. The English news media is not as objective as we want them to be, but with this, NDTV has scaled new heights. What is even more hypocritical is that Barkha Dutt anchors the show “We, the people”, the first words of the preamble to our constitution.

    And we were worried about MNS and Sri Rama Sene.

  59. Arvind Iyer says:

    Thank you for bringing this up…I'll try and spread the news…And I have to say that you have a superb blog design!

  60. Arvind Iyer says:

    Thank you for bringing this up…I'll try and spread the news…And I have to say that you have a superb blog design!

  61. Arvind Iyer says:

    Thank you for bringing this up…I'll try and spread the news…And I have to say that you have a superb blog design!

  62. Arvind Iyer says:

    Thank you for bringing this up…I'll try and spread the news…And I have to say that you have a superb blog design!

  63. Arvind Iyer says:

    Thank you for bringing this up…I'll try and spread the news…And I have to say that you have a superb blog design!

  64. Arvind Iyer says:

    Thank you for bringing this up…I'll try and spread the news…And I have to say that you have a superb blog design!

  65. Arvind Iyer says:

    Thank you for bringing this up…I'll try and spread the news…And I have to say that you have a superb blog design!

  66. Arvind Iyer says:

    Thank you for bringing this up…I'll try and spread the news…And I have to say that you have a superb blog design!

  67. Arvind Iyer says:

    Thank you for bringing this up…I'll try and spread the news…And I have to say that you have a superb blog design!

  68. Arvind Iyer says:

    Thank you for bringing this up…I'll try and spread the news…And I have to say that you have a superb blog design!

  69. Shripriya says:

    Thanks on both counts, Arvind.

  70. Shripriya says:

    Thanks on both counts, Arvind.

  71. Shripriya says:

    Thanks on both counts, Arvind.

  72. Shripriya says:

    Thanks on both counts, Arvind.

  73. Shripriya says:

    Thanks on both counts, Arvind.

  74. Shripriya says:

    Thanks on both counts, Arvind.

  75. Shripriya says:

    Thanks on both counts, Arvind.

  76. Shripriya says:

    Thanks on both counts, Arvind.

  77. Shripriya says:

    Thanks on both counts, Arvind.

  78. pkr says:

    My friend who is a journalist with a big publication is fighting two case of libel filed against him by Arjun Singh (HRD Minister) for writing relatively benign articles and that too when he has done a thorough investigation before writing both of his pieces and no there was no hue and cry in the media about this.

    My point is that the journalists don't have it as easy as you make it sound. And they do get dragged to court more often than you know, if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility. Also isn't it Barkha Dutt's right to defend herself against what is being written about her, without any proof?

  79. pkr says:

    My friend who is a journalist with a big publication is fighting two case of libel filed against him by Arjun Singh (HRD Minister) for writing relatively benign articles and that too when he has done a thorough investigation before writing both of his pieces and no there was no hue and cry in the media about this.

    My point is that the journalists don't have it as easy as you make it sound. And they do get dragged to court more often than you know, if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility. Also isn't it Barkha Dutt's right to defend herself against what is being written about her, without any proof?

  80. pkr says:

    My friend who is a journalist with a big publication is fighting two case of libel filed against him by Arjun Singh (HRD Minister) for writing relatively benign articles and that too when he has done a thorough investigation before writing both of his pieces and no there was no hue and cry in the media about this.

    My point is that the journalists don't have it as easy as you make it sound. And they do get dragged to court more often than you know, if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility. Also isn't it Barkha Dutt's right to defend herself against what is being written about her, without any proof?

  81. pkr says:

    My friend who is a journalist with a big publication is fighting two case of libel filed against him by Arjun Singh (HRD Minister) for writing relatively benign articles and that too when he has done a thorough investigation before writing both of his pieces and no there was no hue and cry in the media about this.

    My point is that the journalists don't have it as easy as you make it sound. And they do get dragged to court more often than you know, if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility. Also isn't it Barkha Dutt's right to defend herself against what is being written about her, without any proof?

  82. pkr says:

    My friend who is a journalist with a big publication is fighting two case of libel filed against him by Arjun Singh (HRD Minister) for writing relatively benign articles and that too when he has done a thorough investigation before writing both of his pieces and no there was no hue and cry in the media about this.

    My point is that the journalists don't have it as easy as you make it sound. And they do get dragged to court more often than you know, if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility. Also isn't it Barkha Dutt's right to defend herself against what is being written about her, without any proof?

  83. pkr says:

    My friend who is a journalist with a big publication is fighting two case of libel filed against him by Arjun Singh (HRD Minister) for writing relatively benign articles and that too when he has done a thorough investigation before writing both of his pieces and no there was no hue and cry in the media about this.

    My point is that the journalists don't have it as easy as you make it sound. And they do get dragged to court more often than you know, if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility. Also isn't it Barkha Dutt's right to defend herself against what is being written about her, without any proof?

  84. pkr says:

    My friend who is a journalist with a big publication is fighting two case of libel filed against him by Arjun Singh (HRD Minister) for writing relatively benign articles and that too when he has done a thorough investigation before writing both of his pieces and no there was no hue and cry in the media about this.

    My point is that the journalists don't have it as easy as you make it sound. And they do get dragged to court more often than you know, if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility. Also isn't it Barkha Dutt's right to defend herself against what is being written about her, without any proof?

  85. pkr says:

    My friend who is a journalist with a big publication is fighting two case of libel filed against him by Arjun Singh (HRD Minister) for writing relatively benign articles and that too when he has done a thorough investigation before writing both of his pieces and no there was no hue and cry in the media about this.

    My point is that the journalists don't have it as easy as you make it sound. And they do get dragged to court more often than you know, if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility. Also isn't it Barkha Dutt's right to defend herself against what is being written about her, without any proof?

  86. pkr says:

    My friend who is a journalist with a big publication is fighting two case of libel filed against him by Arjun Singh (HRD Minister) for writing relatively benign articles and that too when he has done a thorough investigation before writing both of his pieces and no there was no hue and cry in the media about this.

    My point is that the journalists don't have it as easy as you make it sound. And they do get dragged to court more often than you know, if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility. Also isn't it Barkha Dutt's right to defend herself against what is being written about her, without any proof?

  87. pkr says:

    My friend who is a journalist with a big publication is fighting two case of libel filed against him by Arjun Singh (HRD Minister) for writing relatively benign articles and that too when he has done a thorough investigation before writing both of his pieces and no there was no hue and cry in the media about this.

    My point is that the journalists don't have it as easy as you make it sound. And they do get dragged to court more often than you know, if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility. Also isn't it Barkha Dutt's right to defend herself against what is being written about her, without any proof?

  88. bongopondit says:

    “if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility”

    What exactly was irresponsible about Chyetanya's writing ? He criticized a journalist. So have many others. It was in fact the big media that has been acting irresponsibly.

    And Barkha Dutt has every right to defend herself, and she has a much bigger forum to do so compared to any blogger. Why use the weight of legal force ?

  89. bongopondit says:

    “if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility”

    What exactly was irresponsible about Chyetanya's writing ? He criticized a journalist. So have many others. It was in fact the big media that has been acting irresponsibly.

    And Barkha Dutt has every right to defend herself, and she has a much bigger forum to do so compared to any blogger. Why use the weight of legal force ?

  90. bongopondit says:

    “if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility”

    What exactly was irresponsible about Chyetanya's writing ? He criticized a journalist. So have many others. It was in fact the big media that has been acting irresponsibly.

    And Barkha Dutt has every right to defend herself, and she has a much bigger forum to do so compared to any blogger. Why use the weight of legal force ?

  91. bongopondit says:

    “if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility”

    What exactly was irresponsible about Chyetanya's writing ? He criticized a journalist. So have many others. It was in fact the big media that has been acting irresponsibly.

    And Barkha Dutt has every right to defend herself, and she has a much bigger forum to do so compared to any blogger. Why use the weight of legal force ?

  92. bongopondit says:

    “if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility”

    What exactly was irresponsible about Chyetanya's writing ? He criticized a journalist. So have many others. It was in fact the big media that has been acting irresponsibly.

    And Barkha Dutt has every right to defend herself, and she has a much bigger forum to do so compared to any blogger. Why use the weight of legal force ?

  93. bongopondit says:

    “if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility”

    What exactly was irresponsible about Chyetanya's writing ? He criticized a journalist. So have many others. It was in fact the big media that has been acting irresponsibly.

    And Barkha Dutt has every right to defend herself, and she has a much bigger forum to do so compared to any blogger. Why use the weight of legal force ?

  94. bongopondit says:

    “if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility”

    What exactly was irresponsible about Chyetanya's writing ? He criticized a journalist. So have many others. It was in fact the big media that has been acting irresponsibly.

    And Barkha Dutt has every right to defend herself, and she has a much bigger forum to do so compared to any blogger. Why use the weight of legal force ?

  95. bongopondit says:

    “if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility”

    What exactly was irresponsible about Chyetanya's writing ? He criticized a journalist. So have many others. It was in fact the big media that has been acting irresponsibly.

    And Barkha Dutt has every right to defend herself, and she has a much bigger forum to do so compared to any blogger. Why use the weight of legal force ?

  96. bongopondit says:

    “if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility”

    What exactly was irresponsible about Chyetanya's writing ? He criticized a journalist. So have many others. It was in fact the big media that has been acting irresponsibly.

    And Barkha Dutt has every right to defend herself, and she has a much bigger forum to do so compared to any blogger. Why use the weight of legal force ?

  97. bongopondit says:

    “if bloggers want to project themselves as the “alternative” media they better start writing with more responsibility”

    What exactly was irresponsible about Chyetanya's writing ? He criticized a journalist. So have many others. It was in fact the big media that has been acting irresponsibly.

    And Barkha Dutt has every right to defend herself, and she has a much bigger forum to do so compared to any blogger. Why use the weight of legal force ?

  98. amreekandesi says:

    Exactly my thoughts. I too felt that the media behaved very irresponsibly in their coverage of the Mumbai attacks, and using their might to crush us poor bloggers is not fair play.

  99. amreekandesi says:

    Exactly my thoughts. I too felt that the media behaved very irresponsibly in their coverage of the Mumbai attacks, and using their might to crush us poor bloggers is not fair play.

  100. amreekandesi says:

    Exactly my thoughts. I too felt that the media behaved very irresponsibly in their coverage of the Mumbai attacks, and using their might to crush us poor bloggers is not fair play.

  101. amreekandesi says:

    Exactly my thoughts. I too felt that the media behaved very irresponsibly in their coverage of the Mumbai attacks, and using their might to crush us poor bloggers is not fair play.

  102. amreekandesi says:

    Exactly my thoughts. I too felt that the media behaved very irresponsibly in their coverage of the Mumbai attacks, and using their might to crush us poor bloggers is not fair play.

  103. amreekandesi says:

    Exactly my thoughts. I too felt that the media behaved very irresponsibly in their coverage of the Mumbai attacks, and using their might to crush us poor bloggers is not fair play.

  104. amreekandesi says:

    Exactly my thoughts. I too felt that the media behaved very irresponsibly in their coverage of the Mumbai attacks, and using their might to crush us poor bloggers is not fair play.

  105. amreekandesi says:

    Exactly my thoughts. I too felt that the media behaved very irresponsibly in their coverage of the Mumbai attacks, and using their might to crush us poor bloggers is not fair play.

  106. amreekandesi says:

    Exactly my thoughts. I too felt that the media behaved very irresponsibly in their coverage of the Mumbai attacks, and using their might to crush us poor bloggers is not fair play.

  107. amreekandesi says:

    Exactly my thoughts. I too felt that the media behaved very irresponsibly in their coverage of the Mumbai attacks, and using their might to crush us poor bloggers is not fair play.

  108. Pingback: Muffling a Blogger
  109. Barkha Dutt is a maggot. And so are the so called pseudo intellects and secular dimwit clowns.

  110. Barkha Dutt is a maggot. And so are the so called pseudo intellects and secular dimwit clowns.

  111. Barkha Dutt is a maggot. And so are the so called pseudo intellects and secular dimwit clowns.

  112. Barkha Dutt is a maggot. And so are the so called pseudo intellects and secular dimwit clowns.

  113. Barkha Dutt is a maggot. And so are the so called pseudo intellects and secular dimwit clowns.

  114. Barkha Dutt is a maggot. And so are the so called pseudo intellects and secular dimwit clowns.

  115. Barkha Dutt is a maggot. And so are the so called pseudo intellects and secular dimwit clowns.

  116. Barkha Dutt is a maggot. And so are the so called pseudo intellects and secular dimwit clowns.

  117. Barkha Dutt is a maggot. And so are the so called pseudo intellects and secular dimwit clowns.

  118. Barkha Dutt is a maggot. And so are the so called pseudo intellects and secular dimwit clowns.

  119. che2on says:

    I Have great respect for Ms Barkha dutt..

  120. che2on says:

    I Have great respect for Ms Barkha dutt..

  121. che2on says:

    I Have great respect for Ms Barkha dutt..

  122. che2on says:

    I Have great respect for Ms Barkha dutt..

  123. che2on says:

    I Have great respect for Ms Barkha dutt..

  124. che2on says:

    I Have great respect for Ms Barkha dutt..

  125. che2on says:

    I Have great respect for Ms Barkha dutt..

  126. che2on says:

    I Have great respect for Ms Barkha dutt..

  127. che2on says:

    I Have great respect for Ms Barkha dutt..

  128. che2on says:

    I Have great respect for Ms Barkha dutt..

  129. mansi says:

    This is absolutely terrible! Instead of apologizing to the public and admitting their mistakes, they go ahead and punish someone who noticed their mistakes. Wow!

  130. mansi says:

    This is absolutely terrible! Instead of apologizing to the public and admitting their mistakes, they go ahead and punish someone who noticed their mistakes. Wow!

  131. mansi says:

    This is absolutely terrible! Instead of apologizing to the public and admitting their mistakes, they go ahead and punish someone who noticed their mistakes. Wow!

  132. mansi says:

    This is absolutely terrible! Instead of apologizing to the public and admitting their mistakes, they go ahead and punish someone who noticed their mistakes. Wow!

  133. mansi says:

    This is absolutely terrible! Instead of apologizing to the public and admitting their mistakes, they go ahead and punish someone who noticed their mistakes. Wow!

  134. mansi says:

    This is absolutely terrible! Instead of apologizing to the public and admitting their mistakes, they go ahead and punish someone who noticed their mistakes. Wow!

  135. mansi says:

    This is absolutely terrible! Instead of apologizing to the public and admitting their mistakes, they go ahead and punish someone who noticed their mistakes. Wow!

  136. mansi says:

    This is absolutely terrible! Instead of apologizing to the public and admitting their mistakes, they go ahead and punish someone who noticed their mistakes. Wow!

  137. mansi says:

    This is absolutely terrible! Instead of apologizing to the public and admitting their mistakes, they go ahead and punish someone who noticed their mistakes. Wow!

  138. mansi says:

    This is absolutely terrible! Instead of apologizing to the public and admitting their mistakes, they go ahead and punish someone who noticed their mistakes. Wow!

  139. This is reminding me of the IIPM episode when a “stating of facts” led IIPM to sue some bloggers who wrote abt it! Is there anything wrong with what Chetan wrote in his post? I think we all saw the irresponsible journalism done by Barkha dutt. There are whole communities on this act of hers. Are she and NDTV going to sue all of them?

  140. This is reminding me of the IIPM episode when a “stating of facts” led IIPM to sue some bloggers who wrote abt it! Is there anything wrong with what Chetan wrote in his post? I think we all saw the irresponsible journalism done by Barkha dutt. There are whole communities on this act of hers. Are she and NDTV going to sue all of them?

  141. This is reminding me of the IIPM episode when a “stating of facts” led IIPM to sue some bloggers who wrote abt it! Is there anything wrong with what Chetan wrote in his post? I think we all saw the irresponsible journalism done by Barkha dutt. There are whole communities on this act of hers. Are she and NDTV going to sue all of them?

  142. This is reminding me of the IIPM episode when a “stating of facts” led IIPM to sue some bloggers who wrote abt it! Is there anything wrong with what Chetan wrote in his post? I think we all saw the irresponsible journalism done by Barkha dutt. There are whole communities on this act of hers. Are she and NDTV going to sue all of them?

  143. This is reminding me of the IIPM episode when a “stating of facts” led IIPM to sue some bloggers who wrote abt it! Is there anything wrong with what Chetan wrote in his post? I think we all saw the irresponsible journalism done by Barkha dutt. There are whole communities on this act of hers. Are she and NDTV going to sue all of them?

  144. This is reminding me of the IIPM episode when a “stating of facts” led IIPM to sue some bloggers who wrote abt it! Is there anything wrong with what Chetan wrote in his post? I think we all saw the irresponsible journalism done by Barkha dutt. There are whole communities on this act of hers. Are she and NDTV going to sue all of them?

  145. This is reminding me of the IIPM episode when a “stating of facts” led IIPM to sue some bloggers who wrote abt it! Is there anything wrong with what Chetan wrote in his post? I think we all saw the irresponsible journalism done by Barkha dutt. There are whole communities on this act of hers. Are she and NDTV going to sue all of them?

  146. This is reminding me of the IIPM episode when a “stating of facts” led IIPM to sue some bloggers who wrote abt it! Is there anything wrong with what Chetan wrote in his post? I think we all saw the irresponsible journalism done by Barkha dutt. There are whole communities on this act of hers. Are she and NDTV going to sue all of them?

  147. This is reminding me of the IIPM episode when a “stating of facts” led IIPM to sue some bloggers who wrote abt it! Is there anything wrong with what Chetan wrote in his post? I think we all saw the irresponsible journalism done by Barkha dutt. There are whole communities on this act of hers. Are she and NDTV going to sue all of them?

  148. This is reminding me of the IIPM episode when a “stating of facts” led IIPM to sue some bloggers who wrote abt it! Is there anything wrong with what Chetan wrote in his post? I think we all saw the irresponsible journalism done by Barkha dutt. There are whole communities on this act of hers. Are she and NDTV going to sue all of them?

  149. Sameer says:

    I say it too – Barkha, the Mumbai coverage was wrong wrong wrong. And while I did not think then that it was more than a slip up, I'm now inclined to believe that you actually did it intentionally purely for the TRPs – based on yours and NDTVs reaction to someone's opinion!

    I promise to give the NDTV channels a miss even while surfing.

    Didn't expect them to stoop this low. Really.

  150. Sameer says:

    I say it too – Barkha, the Mumbai coverage was wrong wrong wrong. And while I did not think then that it was more than a slip up, I'm now inclined to believe that you actually did it intentionally purely for the TRPs – based on yours and NDTVs reaction to someone's opinion!

    I promise to give the NDTV channels a miss even while surfing.

    Didn't expect them to stoop this low. Really.

  151. Sameer says:

    I say it too – Barkha, the Mumbai coverage was wrong wrong wrong. And while I did not think then that it was more than a slip up, I'm now inclined to believe that you actually did it intentionally purely for the TRPs – based on yours and NDTVs reaction to someone's opinion!

    I promise to give the NDTV channels a miss even while surfing.

    Didn't expect them to stoop this low. Really.

  152. Sameer says:

    I say it too – Barkha, the Mumbai coverage was wrong wrong wrong. And while I did not think then that it was more than a slip up, I'm now inclined to believe that you actually did it intentionally purely for the TRPs – based on yours and NDTVs reaction to someone's opinion!

    I promise to give the NDTV channels a miss even while surfing.

    Didn't expect them to stoop this low. Really.

  153. Sameer says:

    I say it too – Barkha, the Mumbai coverage was wrong wrong wrong. And while I did not think then that it was more than a slip up, I'm now inclined to believe that you actually did it intentionally purely for the TRPs – based on yours and NDTVs reaction to someone's opinion!

    I promise to give the NDTV channels a miss even while surfing.

    Didn't expect them to stoop this low. Really.

  154. Sameer says:

    I say it too – Barkha, the Mumbai coverage was wrong wrong wrong. And while I did not think then that it was more than a slip up, I'm now inclined to believe that you actually did it intentionally purely for the TRPs – based on yours and NDTVs reaction to someone's opinion!

    I promise to give the NDTV channels a miss even while surfing.

    Didn't expect them to stoop this low. Really.

  155. Sameer says:

    I say it too – Barkha, the Mumbai coverage was wrong wrong wrong. And while I did not think then that it was more than a slip up, I'm now inclined to believe that you actually did it intentionally purely for the TRPs – based on yours and NDTVs reaction to someone's opinion!

    I promise to give the NDTV channels a miss even while surfing.

    Didn't expect them to stoop this low. Really.

  156. Sameer says:

    I say it too – Barkha, the Mumbai coverage was wrong wrong wrong. And while I did not think then that it was more than a slip up, I'm now inclined to believe that you actually did it intentionally purely for the TRPs – based on yours and NDTVs reaction to someone's opinion!

    I promise to give the NDTV channels a miss even while surfing.

    Didn't expect them to stoop this low. Really.

  157. Sameer says:

    I say it too – Barkha, the Mumbai coverage was wrong wrong wrong. And while I did not think then that it was more than a slip up, I'm now inclined to believe that you actually did it intentionally purely for the TRPs – based on yours and NDTVs reaction to someone's opinion!

    I promise to give the NDTV channels a miss even while surfing.

    Didn't expect them to stoop this low. Really.

  158. Sameer says:

    I say it too – Barkha, the Mumbai coverage was wrong wrong wrong. And while I did not think then that it was more than a slip up, I'm now inclined to believe that you actually did it intentionally purely for the TRPs – based on yours and NDTVs reaction to someone's opinion!

    I promise to give the NDTV channels a miss even while surfing.

    Didn't expect them to stoop this low. Really.

  159. Sameer says:

    Exactly. For the life of me I cannot see what point the NDTV legal team might have picked for the offensive they've launched against the poor guy. Their reporters routinely voice random opinions in their coverage, and a blogger has no right to – even with a far lesser reach its a serious offense.

    Today, NDTV and Barkha join the lowly ranks of whats-his-name-Sardesai in my eyes.

  160. Sameer says:

    Exactly. For the life of me I cannot see what point the NDTV legal team might have picked for the offensive they've launched against the poor guy. Their reporters routinely voice random opinions in their coverage, and a blogger has no right to – even with a far lesser reach its a serious offense.

    Today, NDTV and Barkha join the lowly ranks of whats-his-name-Sardesai in my eyes.

  161. Sameer says:

    Exactly. For the life of me I cannot see what point the NDTV legal team might have picked for the offensive they've launched against the poor guy. Their reporters routinely voice random opinions in their coverage, and a blogger has no right to – even with a far lesser reach its a serious offense.

    Today, NDTV and Barkha join the lowly ranks of whats-his-name-Sardesai in my eyes.

  162. Sameer says:

    Exactly. For the life of me I cannot see what point the NDTV legal team might have picked for the offensive they've launched against the poor guy. Their reporters routinely voice random opinions in their coverage, and a blogger has no right to – even with a far lesser reach its a serious offense.

    Today, NDTV and Barkha join the lowly ranks of whats-his-name-Sardesai in my eyes.

  163. Sameer says:

    Exactly. For the life of me I cannot see what point the NDTV legal team might have picked for the offensive they've launched against the poor guy. Their reporters routinely voice random opinions in their coverage, and a blogger has no right to – even with a far lesser reach its a serious offense.

    Today, NDTV and Barkha join the lowly ranks of whats-his-name-Sardesai in my eyes.

  164. Sameer says:

    Exactly. For the life of me I cannot see what point the NDTV legal team might have picked for the offensive they've launched against the poor guy. Their reporters routinely voice random opinions in their coverage, and a blogger has no right to – even with a far lesser reach its a serious offense.

    Today, NDTV and Barkha join the lowly ranks of whats-his-name-Sardesai in my eyes.

  165. Sameer says:

    Exactly. For the life of me I cannot see what point the NDTV legal team might have picked for the offensive they've launched against the poor guy. Their reporters routinely voice random opinions in their coverage, and a blogger has no right to – even with a far lesser reach its a serious offense.

    Today, NDTV and Barkha join the lowly ranks of whats-his-name-Sardesai in my eyes.

  166. Sameer says:

    Exactly. For the life of me I cannot see what point the NDTV legal team might have picked for the offensive they've launched against the poor guy. Their reporters routinely voice random opinions in their coverage, and a blogger has no right to – even with a far lesser reach its a serious offense.

    Today, NDTV and Barkha join the lowly ranks of whats-his-name-Sardesai in my eyes.

  167. Sameer says:

    Exactly. For the life of me I cannot see what point the NDTV legal team might have picked for the offensive they've launched against the poor guy. Their reporters routinely voice random opinions in their coverage, and a blogger has no right to – even with a far lesser reach its a serious offense.

    Today, NDTV and Barkha join the lowly ranks of whats-his-name-Sardesai in my eyes.

  168. Sameer says:

    Exactly. For the life of me I cannot see what point the NDTV legal team might have picked for the offensive they've launched against the poor guy. Their reporters routinely voice random opinions in their coverage, and a blogger has no right to – even with a far lesser reach its a serious offense.

    Today, NDTV and Barkha join the lowly ranks of whats-his-name-Sardesai in my eyes.

  169. Venkat says:

    NDTV should apologize in public and fire Burkha Dutt and its legal staff. In fact the legal staff is as much to blame as the horrible Ms Dutt. I read that blog once and once only. Never been there after and I feel it is outrageous of NDTV to do what it did. I am going to stop watching that channel from today. Period.

  170. Venkat says:

    NDTV should apologize in public and fire Burkha Dutt and its legal staff. In fact the legal staff is as much to blame as the horrible Ms Dutt. I read that blog once and once only. Never been there after and I feel it is outrageous of NDTV to do what it did. I am going to stop watching that channel from today. Period.

  171. Venkat says:

    NDTV should apologize in public and fire Burkha Dutt and its legal staff. In fact the legal staff is as much to blame as the horrible Ms Dutt. I read that blog once and once only. Never been there after and I feel it is outrageous of NDTV to do what it did. I am going to stop watching that channel from today. Period.

  172. Venkat says:

    NDTV should apologize in public and fire Burkha Dutt and its legal staff. In fact the legal staff is as much to blame as the horrible Ms Dutt. I read that blog once and once only. Never been there after and I feel it is outrageous of NDTV to do what it did. I am going to stop watching that channel from today. Period.

  173. Venkat says:

    NDTV should apologize in public and fire Burkha Dutt and its legal staff. In fact the legal staff is as much to blame as the horrible Ms Dutt. I read that blog once and once only. Never been there after and I feel it is outrageous of NDTV to do what it did. I am going to stop watching that channel from today. Period.

  174. Venkat says:

    NDTV should apologize in public and fire Burkha Dutt and its legal staff. In fact the legal staff is as much to blame as the horrible Ms Dutt. I read that blog once and once only. Never been there after and I feel it is outrageous of NDTV to do what it did. I am going to stop watching that channel from today. Period.

  175. Venkat says:

    NDTV should apologize in public and fire Burkha Dutt and its legal staff. In fact the legal staff is as much to blame as the horrible Ms Dutt. I read that blog once and once only. Never been there after and I feel it is outrageous of NDTV to do what it did. I am going to stop watching that channel from today. Period.

  176. Venkat says:

    NDTV should apologize in public and fire Burkha Dutt and its legal staff. In fact the legal staff is as much to blame as the horrible Ms Dutt. I read that blog once and once only. Never been there after and I feel it is outrageous of NDTV to do what it did. I am going to stop watching that channel from today. Period.

  177. Venkat says:

    NDTV should apologize in public and fire Burkha Dutt and its legal staff. In fact the legal staff is as much to blame as the horrible Ms Dutt. I read that blog once and once only. Never been there after and I feel it is outrageous of NDTV to do what it did. I am going to stop watching that channel from today. Period.

  178. Venkat says:

    NDTV should apologize in public and fire Burkha Dutt and its legal staff. In fact the legal staff is as much to blame as the horrible Ms Dutt. I read that blog once and once only. Never been there after and I feel it is outrageous of NDTV to do what it did. I am going to stop watching that channel from today. Period.

  179. Earlier, we used to crib about politicos were corrupted, now the western world funded media is joining them..wow..

    “Mera Bharat Mahan”

    PS – I have got no personal enmity with her, but the fact is that – Barkha Dutt is one of the ugly faces you will see on Indian television. It (she?) believes that it (she?) is on verge of becoming yet another demi God. She might be very intellectual, but she gets unbearable after 15 seconds. I dont know who coined the term ' Bolbachhan', but Barkha Dutt is like that – 'BolBachhan'. Cant do anything more then just quibbling with a mic in front of camera in a safe studio environment.

    Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality that boasts of having the moral right to dictate anything and everything she finds right. She's not one of her kind, there are many people with her. This tendency should stop, else we will see another war in the making..

  180. Earlier, we used to crib about politicos were corrupted, now the western world funded media is joining them..wow..

    “Mera Bharat Mahan”

    PS – I have got no personal enmity with her, but the fact is that – Barkha Dutt is one of the ugly faces you will see on Indian television. It (she?) believes that it (she?) is on verge of becoming yet another demi God. She might be very intellectual, but she gets unbearable after 15 seconds. I dont know who coined the term ' Bolbachhan', but Barkha Dutt is like that – 'BolBachhan'. Cant do anything more then just quibbling with a mic in front of camera in a safe studio environment.

    Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality that boasts of having the moral right to dictate anything and everything she finds right. She's not one of her kind, there are many people with her. This tendency should stop, else we will see another war in the making..

  181. Earlier, we used to crib about politicos were corrupted, now the western world funded media is joining them..wow..

    “Mera Bharat Mahan”

    PS – I have got no personal enmity with her, but the fact is that – Barkha Dutt is one of the ugly faces you will see on Indian television. It (she?) believes that it (she?) is on verge of becoming yet another demi God. She might be very intellectual, but she gets unbearable after 15 seconds. I dont know who coined the term ' Bolbachhan', but Barkha Dutt is like that – 'BolBachhan'. Cant do anything more then just quibbling with a mic in front of camera in a safe studio environment.

    Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality that boasts of having the moral right to dictate anything and everything she finds right. She's not one of her kind, there are many people with her. This tendency should stop, else we will see another war in the making..

  182. Earlier, we used to crib about politicos were corrupted, now the western world funded media is joining them..wow..

    “Mera Bharat Mahan”

    PS – I have got no personal enmity with her, but the fact is that – Barkha Dutt is one of the ugly faces you will see on Indian television. It (she?) believes that it (she?) is on verge of becoming yet another demi God. She might be very intellectual, but she gets unbearable after 15 seconds. I dont know who coined the term ' Bolbachhan', but Barkha Dutt is like that – 'BolBachhan'. Cant do anything more then just quibbling with a mic in front of camera in a safe studio environment.

    Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality that boasts of having the moral right to dictate anything and everything she finds right. She's not one of her kind, there are many people with her. This tendency should stop, else we will see another war in the making..

  183. Earlier, we used to crib about politicos were corrupted, now the western world funded media is joining them..wow..

    “Mera Bharat Mahan”

    PS – I have got no personal enmity with her, but the fact is that – Barkha Dutt is one of the ugly faces you will see on Indian television. It (she?) believes that it (she?) is on verge of becoming yet another demi God. She might be very intellectual, but she gets unbearable after 15 seconds. I dont know who coined the term ' Bolbachhan', but Barkha Dutt is like that – 'BolBachhan'. Cant do anything more then just quibbling with a mic in front of camera in a safe studio environment.

    Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality that boasts of having the moral right to dictate anything and everything she finds right. She's not one of her kind, there are many people with her. This tendency should stop, else we will see another war in the making..

  184. Earlier, we used to crib about politicos were corrupted, now the western world funded media is joining them..wow..

    “Mera Bharat Mahan”

    PS – I have got no personal enmity with her, but the fact is that – Barkha Dutt is one of the ugly faces you will see on Indian television. It (she?) believes that it (she?) is on verge of becoming yet another demi God. She might be very intellectual, but she gets unbearable after 15 seconds. I dont know who coined the term ' Bolbachhan', but Barkha Dutt is like that – 'BolBachhan'. Cant do anything more then just quibbling with a mic in front of camera in a safe studio environment.

    Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality that boasts of having the moral right to dictate anything and everything she finds right. She's not one of her kind, there are many people with her. This tendency should stop, else we will see another war in the making..

  185. Earlier, we used to crib about politicos were corrupted, now the western world funded media is joining them..wow..

    “Mera Bharat Mahan”

    PS – I have got no personal enmity with her, but the fact is that – Barkha Dutt is one of the ugly faces you will see on Indian television. It (she?) believes that it (she?) is on verge of becoming yet another demi God. She might be very intellectual, but she gets unbearable after 15 seconds. I dont know who coined the term ' Bolbachhan', but Barkha Dutt is like that – 'BolBachhan'. Cant do anything more then just quibbling with a mic in front of camera in a safe studio environment.

    Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality that boasts of having the moral right to dictate anything and everything she finds right. She's not one of her kind, there are many people with her. This tendency should stop, else we will see another war in the making..

  186. Earlier, we used to crib about politicos were corrupted, now the western world funded media is joining them..wow..

    “Mera Bharat Mahan”

    PS – I have got no personal enmity with her, but the fact is that – Barkha Dutt is one of the ugly faces you will see on Indian television. It (she?) believes that it (she?) is on verge of becoming yet another demi God. She might be very intellectual, but she gets unbearable after 15 seconds. I dont know who coined the term ' Bolbachhan', but Barkha Dutt is like that – 'BolBachhan'. Cant do anything more then just quibbling with a mic in front of camera in a safe studio environment.

    Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality that boasts of having the moral right to dictate anything and everything she finds right. She's not one of her kind, there are many people with her. This tendency should stop, else we will see another war in the making..

  187. Earlier, we used to crib about politicos were corrupted, now the western world funded media is joining them..wow..

    “Mera Bharat Mahan”

    PS – I have got no personal enmity with her, but the fact is that – Barkha Dutt is one of the ugly faces you will see on Indian television. It (she?) believes that it (she?) is on verge of becoming yet another demi God. She might be very intellectual, but she gets unbearable after 15 seconds. I dont know who coined the term ' Bolbachhan', but Barkha Dutt is like that – 'BolBachhan'. Cant do anything more then just quibbling with a mic in front of camera in a safe studio environment.

    Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality that boasts of having the moral right to dictate anything and everything she finds right. She's not one of her kind, there are many people with her. This tendency should stop, else we will see another war in the making..

  188. Earlier, we used to crib about politicos were corrupted, now the western world funded media is joining them..wow..

    “Mera Bharat Mahan”

    PS – I have got no personal enmity with her, but the fact is that – Barkha Dutt is one of the ugly faces you will see on Indian television. It (she?) believes that it (she?) is on verge of becoming yet another demi God. She might be very intellectual, but she gets unbearable after 15 seconds. I dont know who coined the term ' Bolbachhan', but Barkha Dutt is like that – 'BolBachhan'. Cant do anything more then just quibbling with a mic in front of camera in a safe studio environment.

    Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality that boasts of having the moral right to dictate anything and everything she finds right. She's not one of her kind, there are many people with her. This tendency should stop, else we will see another war in the making..

  189. Prakash says:

    Looks Like Barkha is feeling the hit. Perhaps decided to show some Muscle.

    Infact even I posted on Barkha around that time ( Nov 26th) and spewed my disgust.

    I am feeling Lucky. 🙂

    Why not start a signature campaign in support of Chyetanya Kunte.

  190. Prakash says:

    Looks Like Barkha is feeling the hit. Perhaps decided to show some Muscle.

    Infact even I posted on Barkha around that time ( Nov 26th) and spewed my disgust.

    I am feeling Lucky. 🙂

    Why not start a signature campaign in support of Chyetanya Kunte.

  191. Prakash says:

    Looks Like Barkha is feeling the hit. Perhaps decided to show some Muscle.

    Infact even I posted on Barkha around that time ( Nov 26th) and spewed my disgust.

    I am feeling Lucky. 🙂

    Why not start a signature campaign in support of Chyetanya Kunte.

  192. Prakash says:

    Looks Like Barkha is feeling the hit. Perhaps decided to show some Muscle.

    Infact even I posted on Barkha around that time ( Nov 26th) and spewed my disgust.

    I am feeling Lucky. 🙂

    Why not start a signature campaign in support of Chyetanya Kunte.

  193. Prakash says:

    Looks Like Barkha is feeling the hit. Perhaps decided to show some Muscle.

    Infact even I posted on Barkha around that time ( Nov 26th) and spewed my disgust.

    I am feeling Lucky. 🙂

    Why not start a signature campaign in support of Chyetanya Kunte.

  194. Prakash says:

    Looks Like Barkha is feeling the hit. Perhaps decided to show some Muscle.

    Infact even I posted on Barkha around that time ( Nov 26th) and spewed my disgust.

    I am feeling Lucky. 🙂

    Why not start a signature campaign in support of Chyetanya Kunte.

  195. Prakash says:

    Looks Like Barkha is feeling the hit. Perhaps decided to show some Muscle.

    Infact even I posted on Barkha around that time ( Nov 26th) and spewed my disgust.

    I am feeling Lucky. 🙂

    Why not start a signature campaign in support of Chyetanya Kunte.

  196. Prakash says:

    Looks Like Barkha is feeling the hit. Perhaps decided to show some Muscle.

    Infact even I posted on Barkha around that time ( Nov 26th) and spewed my disgust.

    I am feeling Lucky. 🙂

    Why not start a signature campaign in support of Chyetanya Kunte.

  197. Prakash says:

    Looks Like Barkha is feeling the hit. Perhaps decided to show some Muscle.

    Infact even I posted on Barkha around that time ( Nov 26th) and spewed my disgust.

    I am feeling Lucky. 🙂

    Why not start a signature campaign in support of Chyetanya Kunte.

  198. Lets start watching good old DD NEWS 😉

    Surprisingly, amidst all controversies, DD NEWS shows what we can say is the most unbiased* view of every news

    * – Approved by the central govt.

  199. Lets start watching good old DD NEWS 😉

    Surprisingly, amidst all controversies, DD NEWS shows what we can say is the most unbiased* view of every news

    * – Approved by the central govt.

  200. Lets start watching good old DD NEWS 😉

    Surprisingly, amidst all controversies, DD NEWS shows what we can say is the most unbiased* view of every news

    * – Approved by the central govt.

  201. Lets start watching good old DD NEWS 😉

    Surprisingly, amidst all controversies, DD NEWS shows what we can say is the most unbiased* view of every news

    * – Approved by the central govt.

  202. Lets start watching good old DD NEWS 😉

    Surprisingly, amidst all controversies, DD NEWS shows what we can say is the most unbiased* view of every news

    * – Approved by the central govt.

  203. Lets start watching good old DD NEWS 😉

    Surprisingly, amidst all controversies, DD NEWS shows what we can say is the most unbiased* view of every news

    * – Approved by the central govt.

  204. Lets start watching good old DD NEWS 😉

    Surprisingly, amidst all controversies, DD NEWS shows what we can say is the most unbiased* view of every news

    * – Approved by the central govt.

  205. Lets start watching good old DD NEWS 😉

    Surprisingly, amidst all controversies, DD NEWS shows what we can say is the most unbiased* view of every news

    * – Approved by the central govt.

  206. Lets start watching good old DD NEWS 😉

    Surprisingly, amidst all controversies, DD NEWS shows what we can say is the most unbiased* view of every news

    * – Approved by the central govt.

  207. Lets start watching good old DD NEWS 😉

    Surprisingly, amidst all controversies, DD NEWS shows what we can say is the most unbiased* view of every news

    * – Approved by the central govt.

  208. beyondwork says:

    NDTV and barkha dutt are the two who really cares about this nation. no other people will have that much care as they do. their TRP ratings are so high and people trusted these channels for all the news. they all talk about freedom of speech, and other rights on screen. its only for people. off screen, they are just another human who are profound to do mistakes because of their ego as they have reached a height where they think what ever they do is right

  209. beyondwork says:

    NDTV and barkha dutt are the two who really cares about this nation. no other people will have that much care as they do. their TRP ratings are so high and people trusted these channels for all the news. they all talk about freedom of speech, and other rights on screen. its only for people. off screen, they are just another human who are profound to do mistakes because of their ego as they have reached a height where they think what ever they do is right

  210. beyondwork says:

    NDTV and barkha dutt are the two who really cares about this nation. no other people will have that much care as they do. their TRP ratings are so high and people trusted these channels for all the news. they all talk about freedom of speech, and other rights on screen. its only for people. off screen, they are just another human who are profound to do mistakes because of their ego as they have reached a height where they think what ever they do is right

  211. beyondwork says:

    NDTV and barkha dutt are the two who really cares about this nation. no other people will have that much care as they do. their TRP ratings are so high and people trusted these channels for all the news. they all talk about freedom of speech, and other rights on screen. its only for people. off screen, they are just another human who are profound to do mistakes because of their ego as they have reached a height where they think what ever they do is right

  212. beyondwork says:

    NDTV and barkha dutt are the two who really cares about this nation. no other people will have that much care as they do. their TRP ratings are so high and people trusted these channels for all the news. they all talk about freedom of speech, and other rights on screen. its only for people. off screen, they are just another human who are profound to do mistakes because of their ego as they have reached a height where they think what ever they do is right

  213. beyondwork says:

    NDTV and barkha dutt are the two who really cares about this nation. no other people will have that much care as they do. their TRP ratings are so high and people trusted these channels for all the news. they all talk about freedom of speech, and other rights on screen. its only for people. off screen, they are just another human who are profound to do mistakes because of their ego as they have reached a height where they think what ever they do is right

  214. beyondwork says:

    NDTV and barkha dutt are the two who really cares about this nation. no other people will have that much care as they do. their TRP ratings are so high and people trusted these channels for all the news. they all talk about freedom of speech, and other rights on screen. its only for people. off screen, they are just another human who are profound to do mistakes because of their ego as they have reached a height where they think what ever they do is right

  215. beyondwork says:

    NDTV and barkha dutt are the two who really cares about this nation. no other people will have that much care as they do. their TRP ratings are so high and people trusted these channels for all the news. they all talk about freedom of speech, and other rights on screen. its only for people. off screen, they are just another human who are profound to do mistakes because of their ego as they have reached a height where they think what ever they do is right

  216. beyondwork says:

    NDTV and barkha dutt are the two who really cares about this nation. no other people will have that much care as they do. their TRP ratings are so high and people trusted these channels for all the news. they all talk about freedom of speech, and other rights on screen. its only for people. off screen, they are just another human who are profound to do mistakes because of their ego as they have reached a height where they think what ever they do is right

  217. beyondwork says:

    NDTV and barkha dutt are the two who really cares about this nation. no other people will have that much care as they do. their TRP ratings are so high and people trusted these channels for all the news. they all talk about freedom of speech, and other rights on screen. its only for people. off screen, they are just another human who are profound to do mistakes because of their ego as they have reached a height where they think what ever they do is right

  218. Comicology says:

    Good to see the bloggers being actively vocal in the support of fair-speech. Hope the News Channels change their attitude towards oppressing the views of others.

  219. Comicology says:

    Good to see the bloggers being actively vocal in the support of fair-speech. Hope the News Channels change their attitude towards oppressing the views of others.

  220. Comicology says:

    Good to see the bloggers being actively vocal in the support of fair-speech. Hope the News Channels change their attitude towards oppressing the views of others.

  221. Comicology says:

    Good to see the bloggers being actively vocal in the support of fair-speech. Hope the News Channels change their attitude towards oppressing the views of others.

  222. Comicology says:

    Good to see the bloggers being actively vocal in the support of fair-speech. Hope the News Channels change their attitude towards oppressing the views of others.

  223. Comicology says:

    Good to see the bloggers being actively vocal in the support of fair-speech. Hope the News Channels change their attitude towards oppressing the views of others.

  224. Comicology says:

    Good to see the bloggers being actively vocal in the support of fair-speech. Hope the News Channels change their attitude towards oppressing the views of others.

  225. Comicology says:

    Good to see the bloggers being actively vocal in the support of fair-speech. Hope the News Channels change their attitude towards oppressing the views of others.

  226. Comicology says:

    Good to see the bloggers being actively vocal in the support of fair-speech. Hope the News Channels change their attitude towards oppressing the views of others.

  227. Comicology says:

    Good to see the bloggers being actively vocal in the support of fair-speech. Hope the News Channels change their attitude towards oppressing the views of others.

  228. Arjun says:

    Ms blogger who owns this blog,

    I agree with you completely. There, now you have a partner in crime, maybe we could share the lawyer fee!

    BTW, don't worry, if they wanna track me, they will do so with the IP tagged with this comment.

  229. Arjun says:

    Ms blogger who owns this blog,

    I agree with you completely. There, now you have a partner in crime, maybe we could share the lawyer fee!

    BTW, don't worry, if they wanna track me, they will do so with the IP tagged with this comment.

  230. Arjun says:

    Ms blogger who owns this blog,

    I agree with you completely. There, now you have a partner in crime, maybe we could share the lawyer fee!

    BTW, don't worry, if they wanna track me, they will do so with the IP tagged with this comment.

  231. Arjun says:

    Ms blogger who owns this blog,

    I agree with you completely. There, now you have a partner in crime, maybe we could share the lawyer fee!

    BTW, don't worry, if they wanna track me, they will do so with the IP tagged with this comment.

  232. Arjun says:

    Ms blogger who owns this blog,

    I agree with you completely. There, now you have a partner in crime, maybe we could share the lawyer fee!

    BTW, don't worry, if they wanna track me, they will do so with the IP tagged with this comment.

  233. Arjun says:

    Ms blogger who owns this blog,

    I agree with you completely. There, now you have a partner in crime, maybe we could share the lawyer fee!

    BTW, don't worry, if they wanna track me, they will do so with the IP tagged with this comment.

  234. Arjun says:

    Ms blogger who owns this blog,

    I agree with you completely. There, now you have a partner in crime, maybe we could share the lawyer fee!

    BTW, don't worry, if they wanna track me, they will do so with the IP tagged with this comment.

  235. Arjun says:

    Ms blogger who owns this blog,

    I agree with you completely. There, now you have a partner in crime, maybe we could share the lawyer fee!

    BTW, don't worry, if they wanna track me, they will do so with the IP tagged with this comment.

  236. Arjun says:

    Ms blogger who owns this blog,

    I agree with you completely. There, now you have a partner in crime, maybe we could share the lawyer fee!

    BTW, don't worry, if they wanna track me, they will do so with the IP tagged with this comment.

  237. Arjun says:

    Ms blogger who owns this blog,

    I agree with you completely. There, now you have a partner in crime, maybe we could share the lawyer fee!

    BTW, don't worry, if they wanna track me, they will do so with the IP tagged with this comment.

  238. Greg says:

    I have not read the original blog but did see Kunte's retraction. I like millions watched the Mumbai Attacks and coverage. In the EU we had limited local coverage but – it was always dramatic, extreme and emotive.
    Yes the event was staggering in its mindlessness (my opinion) – that was lead me to trying to understand the event. I have been collating news from ALL sorts in a Mind Map of information (http://tinyurl.com/6cp3p8) – it was revealing as to the information trails, and misinformation. Yes the media over did it. Do we need them – yes. Should they react to critisism – yes. Should they sue – No. Should we all be responsible in what we launch into the ether – probably. But where is the limit between comment, critique, investigation, speculation and fiction and who is the arbiter, hopefully not lawyers.

  239. Greg says:

    I have not read the original blog but did see Kunte's retraction. I like millions watched the Mumbai Attacks and coverage. In the EU we had limited local coverage but – it was always dramatic, extreme and emotive.
    Yes the event was staggering in its mindlessness (my opinion) – that was lead me to trying to understand the event. I have been collating news from ALL sorts in a Mind Map of information (http://tinyurl.com/6cp3p8) – it was revealing as to the information trails, and misinformation. Yes the media over did it. Do we need them – yes. Should they react to critisism – yes. Should they sue – No. Should we all be responsible in what we launch into the ether – probably. But where is the limit between comment, critique, investigation, speculation and fiction and who is the arbiter, hopefully not lawyers.

  240. Greg says:

    I have not read the original blog but did see Kunte's retraction. I like millions watched the Mumbai Attacks and coverage. In the EU we had limited local coverage but – it was always dramatic, extreme and emotive.
    Yes the event was staggering in its mindlessness (my opinion) – that was lead me to trying to understand the event. I have been collating news from ALL sorts in a Mind Map of information (http://tinyurl.com/6cp3p8) – it was revealing as to the information trails, and misinformation. Yes the media over did it. Do we need them – yes. Should they react to critisism – yes. Should they sue – No. Should we all be responsible in what we launch into the ether – probably. But where is the limit between comment, critique, investigation, speculation and fiction and who is the arbiter, hopefully not lawyers.

  241. Greg says:

    I have not read the original blog but did see Kunte's retraction. I like millions watched the Mumbai Attacks and coverage. In the EU we had limited local coverage but – it was always dramatic, extreme and emotive.
    Yes the event was staggering in its mindlessness (my opinion) – that was lead me to trying to understand the event. I have been collating news from ALL sorts in a Mind Map of information (http://tinyurl.com/6cp3p8) – it was revealing as to the information trails, and misinformation. Yes the media over did it. Do we need them – yes. Should they react to critisism – yes. Should they sue – No. Should we all be responsible in what we launch into the ether – probably. But where is the limit between comment, critique, investigation, speculation and fiction and who is the arbiter, hopefully not lawyers.

  242. Greg says:

    I have not read the original blog but did see Kunte's retraction. I like millions watched the Mumbai Attacks and coverage. In the EU we had limited local coverage but – it was always dramatic, extreme and emotive.
    Yes the event was staggering in its mindlessness (my opinion) – that was lead me to trying to understand the event. I have been collating news from ALL sorts in a Mind Map of information (http://tinyurl.com/6cp3p8) – it was revealing as to the information trails, and misinformation. Yes the media over did it. Do we need them – yes. Should they react to critisism – yes. Should they sue – No. Should we all be responsible in what we launch into the ether – probably. But where is the limit between comment, critique, investigation, speculation and fiction and who is the arbiter, hopefully not lawyers.

  243. Greg says:

    I have not read the original blog but did see Kunte's retraction. I like millions watched the Mumbai Attacks and coverage. In the EU we had limited local coverage but – it was always dramatic, extreme and emotive.
    Yes the event was staggering in its mindlessness (my opinion) – that was lead me to trying to understand the event. I have been collating news from ALL sorts in a Mind Map of information (http://tinyurl.com/6cp3p8) – it was revealing as to the information trails, and misinformation. Yes the media over did it. Do we need them – yes. Should they react to critisism – yes. Should they sue – No. Should we all be responsible in what we launch into the ether – probably. But where is the limit between comment, critique, investigation, speculation and fiction and who is the arbiter, hopefully not lawyers.

  244. Greg says:

    I have not read the original blog but did see Kunte's retraction. I like millions watched the Mumbai Attacks and coverage. In the EU we had limited local coverage but – it was always dramatic, extreme and emotive.
    Yes the event was staggering in its mindlessness (my opinion) – that was lead me to trying to understand the event. I have been collating news from ALL sorts in a Mind Map of information (http://tinyurl.com/6cp3p8) – it was revealing as to the information trails, and misinformation. Yes the media over did it. Do we need them – yes. Should they react to critisism – yes. Should they sue – No. Should we all be responsible in what we launch into the ether – probably. But where is the limit between comment, critique, investigation, speculation and fiction and who is the arbiter, hopefully not lawyers.

  245. Greg says:

    I have not read the original blog but did see Kunte's retraction. I like millions watched the Mumbai Attacks and coverage. In the EU we had limited local coverage but – it was always dramatic, extreme and emotive.
    Yes the event was staggering in its mindlessness (my opinion) – that was lead me to trying to understand the event. I have been collating news from ALL sorts in a Mind Map of information (http://tinyurl.com/6cp3p8) – it was revealing as to the information trails, and misinformation. Yes the media over did it. Do we need them – yes. Should they react to critisism – yes. Should they sue – No. Should we all be responsible in what we launch into the ether – probably. But where is the limit between comment, critique, investigation, speculation and fiction and who is the arbiter, hopefully not lawyers.

  246. Greg says:

    I have not read the original blog but did see Kunte's retraction. I like millions watched the Mumbai Attacks and coverage. In the EU we had limited local coverage but – it was always dramatic, extreme and emotive.
    Yes the event was staggering in its mindlessness (my opinion) – that was lead me to trying to understand the event. I have been collating news from ALL sorts in a Mind Map of information (http://tinyurl.com/6cp3p8) – it was revealing as to the information trails, and misinformation. Yes the media over did it. Do we need them – yes. Should they react to critisism – yes. Should they sue – No. Should we all be responsible in what we launch into the ether – probably. But where is the limit between comment, critique, investigation, speculation and fiction and who is the arbiter, hopefully not lawyers.

  247. Greg says:

    I have not read the original blog but did see Kunte's retraction. I like millions watched the Mumbai Attacks and coverage. In the EU we had limited local coverage but – it was always dramatic, extreme and emotive.
    Yes the event was staggering in its mindlessness (my opinion) – that was lead me to trying to understand the event. I have been collating news from ALL sorts in a Mind Map of information (http://tinyurl.com/6cp3p8) – it was revealing as to the information trails, and misinformation. Yes the media over did it. Do we need them – yes. Should they react to critisism – yes. Should they sue – No. Should we all be responsible in what we launch into the ether – probably. But where is the limit between comment, critique, investigation, speculation and fiction and who is the arbiter, hopefully not lawyers.

  248. Trailblazer says:

    @pkr
    Weird. I thought there was enough “proof” on show during the Mumbai attacks itself. What Cheytanya has written is nothing irresponsible as claimed by you. It's normal for people to react in circumstances such as Mumbai.

    Bloggers are the voice of the people. The original We, the People. Not pseudo like NDTV's program. Do you seriously think that if a politician takes Barkha Dutt to court, then she wouldn't come out of it using her “power” and “image”? Bloggers lack the muscle that a corporate powerhouse like NDTV has.

    @Shripriya
    Hats off to the post.

  249. Trailblazer says:

    @pkr
    Weird. I thought there was enough “proof” on show during the Mumbai attacks itself. What Cheytanya has written is nothing irresponsible as claimed by you. It's normal for people to react in circumstances such as Mumbai.

    Bloggers are the voice of the people. The original We, the People. Not pseudo like NDTV's program. Do you seriously think that if a politician takes Barkha Dutt to court, then she wouldn't come out of it using her “power” and “image”? Bloggers lack the muscle that a corporate powerhouse like NDTV has.

    @Shripriya
    Hats off to the post.

  250. Trailblazer says:

    @pkr
    Weird. I thought there was enough “proof” on show during the Mumbai attacks itself. What Cheytanya has written is nothing irresponsible as claimed by you. It's normal for people to react in circumstances such as Mumbai.

    Bloggers are the voice of the people. The original We, the People. Not pseudo like NDTV's program. Do you seriously think that if a politician takes Barkha Dutt to court, then she wouldn't come out of it using her “power” and “image”? Bloggers lack the muscle that a corporate powerhouse like NDTV has.

    @Shripriya
    Hats off to the post.

  251. Trailblazer says:

    @pkr
    Weird. I thought there was enough “proof” on show during the Mumbai attacks itself. What Cheytanya has written is nothing irresponsible as claimed by you. It's normal for people to react in circumstances such as Mumbai.

    Bloggers are the voice of the people. The original We, the People. Not pseudo like NDTV's program. Do you seriously think that if a politician takes Barkha Dutt to court, then she wouldn't come out of it using her “power” and “image”? Bloggers lack the muscle that a corporate powerhouse like NDTV has.

    @Shripriya
    Hats off to the post.

  252. Trailblazer says:

    @pkr
    Weird. I thought there was enough “proof” on show during the Mumbai attacks itself. What Cheytanya has written is nothing irresponsible as claimed by you. It's normal for people to react in circumstances such as Mumbai.

    Bloggers are the voice of the people. The original We, the People. Not pseudo like NDTV's program. Do you seriously think that if a politician takes Barkha Dutt to court, then she wouldn't come out of it using her “power” and “image”? Bloggers lack the muscle that a corporate powerhouse like NDTV has.

    @Shripriya
    Hats off to the post.

  253. Trailblazer says:

    @pkr
    Weird. I thought there was enough “proof” on show during the Mumbai attacks itself. What Cheytanya has written is nothing irresponsible as claimed by you. It's normal for people to react in circumstances such as Mumbai.

    Bloggers are the voice of the people. The original We, the People. Not pseudo like NDTV's program. Do you seriously think that if a politician takes Barkha Dutt to court, then she wouldn't come out of it using her “power” and “image”? Bloggers lack the muscle that a corporate powerhouse like NDTV has.

    @Shripriya
    Hats off to the post.

  254. Trailblazer says:

    @pkr
    Weird. I thought there was enough “proof” on show during the Mumbai attacks itself. What Cheytanya has written is nothing irresponsible as claimed by you. It's normal for people to react in circumstances such as Mumbai.

    Bloggers are the voice of the people. The original We, the People. Not pseudo like NDTV's program. Do you seriously think that if a politician takes Barkha Dutt to court, then she wouldn't come out of it using her “power” and “image”? Bloggers lack the muscle that a corporate powerhouse like NDTV has.

    @Shripriya
    Hats off to the post.

  255. Trailblazer says:

    @pkr
    Weird. I thought there was enough “proof” on show during the Mumbai attacks itself. What Cheytanya has written is nothing irresponsible as claimed by you. It's normal for people to react in circumstances such as Mumbai.

    Bloggers are the voice of the people. The original We, the People. Not pseudo like NDTV's program. Do you seriously think that if a politician takes Barkha Dutt to court, then she wouldn't come out of it using her “power” and “image”? Bloggers lack the muscle that a corporate powerhouse like NDTV has.

    @Shripriya
    Hats off to the post.

  256. Trailblazer says:

    @pkr
    Weird. I thought there was enough “proof” on show during the Mumbai attacks itself. What Cheytanya has written is nothing irresponsible as claimed by you. It's normal for people to react in circumstances such as Mumbai.

    Bloggers are the voice of the people. The original We, the People. Not pseudo like NDTV's program. Do you seriously think that if a politician takes Barkha Dutt to court, then she wouldn't come out of it using her “power” and “image”? Bloggers lack the muscle that a corporate powerhouse like NDTV has.

    @Shripriya
    Hats off to the post.

  257. Trailblazer says:

    @pkr
    Weird. I thought there was enough “proof” on show during the Mumbai attacks itself. What Cheytanya has written is nothing irresponsible as claimed by you. It's normal for people to react in circumstances such as Mumbai.

    Bloggers are the voice of the people. The original We, the People. Not pseudo like NDTV's program. Do you seriously think that if a politician takes Barkha Dutt to court, then she wouldn't come out of it using her “power” and “image”? Bloggers lack the muscle that a corporate powerhouse like NDTV has.

    @Shripriya
    Hats off to the post.

  258. Sanjukta says:

    You guys are all so naive and harmless souls, feels my heart with joy to see the abundance of innocence here, so innocent you are that you just don't get the fact that Mr. Kunte called Ms. Dutt an Idiot. I am guessing according to all you people 'Idiot' is such a sweet name to call, rather harmless freedom of expression. Oh wow such a noble soul Mr. Kunte only next to a saint, so what if he called a fellow woman who is a leading name in her field and has a considerable repute an Idiot.

    Idiocy according to Indian law is a valid condition for nullification of marriages, for denying contractual rights, but hey Barkha Dutt according to Mr. Kunte is an Idiot and so the entire Indian blogsphere, is clueless for the life of their's, just what can possibly Ms. Dutt be upset about, and lo you have the new Blogging Martyr of the country.

    Mr. Kunte's post was far from being responsible journalism. He could have made the same point in much respectable tone. He used rude language not to forget specific use of the word 'idiot'. If it was only a constructive criticism and not an attention seeking exercise, he could have also avoided taking names altogether. But then am not saying he can't make an opinion, sure he can, but he was so not justified in name calling.

    I am sorry to say this but suddenly the bloggers of the nation have started thinking too highly of themselves when they are just as much guilty of cheap publicity as our MSMedia. You can't expect responsible behaviour from others if you can't show the same yourself. Take for eg. people like one Harshad Joshi here who is going about calling Ms.Dutt a Maggot an ugly face and others simply read and move on. The blog owner also didn't bother to remove such comments which use foul language.

    I understand I am the only dissenting voice here and following this comment name calling would start against me. Just in case people forgot freedom of expression does NOT include name calling. But in my defense, am neither against Kunte nor NDTV. I just think we are making too much noise about it. Because us bloggers are no spotless minds. We are part of the circus just our means are different.

  259. Sanjukta says:

    You guys are all so naive and harmless souls, feels my heart with joy to see the abundance of innocence here, so innocent you are that you just don't get the fact that Mr. Kunte called Ms. Dutt an Idiot. I am guessing according to all you people 'Idiot' is such a sweet name to call, rather harmless freedom of expression. Oh wow such a noble soul Mr. Kunte only next to a saint, so what if he called a fellow woman who is a leading name in her field and has a considerable repute an Idiot.

    Idiocy according to Indian law is a valid condition for nullification of marriages, for denying contractual rights, but hey Barkha Dutt according to Mr. Kunte is an Idiot and so the entire Indian blogsphere, is clueless for the life of their's, just what can possibly Ms. Dutt be upset about, and lo you have the new Blogging Martyr of the country.

    Mr. Kunte's post was far from being responsible journalism. He could have made the same point in much respectable tone. He used rude language not to forget specific use of the word 'idiot'. If it was only a constructive criticism and not an attention seeking exercise, he could have also avoided taking names altogether. But then am not saying he can't make an opinion, sure he can, but he was so not justified in name calling.

    I am sorry to say this but suddenly the bloggers of the nation have started thinking too highly of themselves when they are just as much guilty of cheap publicity as our MSMedia. You can't expect responsible behaviour from others if you can't show the same yourself. Take for eg. people like one Harshad Joshi here who is going about calling Ms.Dutt a Maggot an ugly face and others simply read and move on. The blog owner also didn't bother to remove such comments which use foul language.

    I understand I am the only dissenting voice here and following this comment name calling would start against me. Just in case people forgot freedom of expression does NOT include name calling. But in my defense, am neither against Kunte nor NDTV. I just think we are making too much noise about it. Because us bloggers are no spotless minds. We are part of the circus just our means are different.

  260. Sanjukta says:

    You guys are all so naive and harmless souls, feels my heart with joy to see the abundance of innocence here, so innocent you are that you just don't get the fact that Mr. Kunte called Ms. Dutt an Idiot. I am guessing according to all you people 'Idiot' is such a sweet name to call, rather harmless freedom of expression. Oh wow such a noble soul Mr. Kunte only next to a saint, so what if he called a fellow woman who is a leading name in her field and has a considerable repute an Idiot.

    Idiocy according to Indian law is a valid condition for nullification of marriages, for denying contractual rights, but hey Barkha Dutt according to Mr. Kunte is an Idiot and so the entire Indian blogsphere, is clueless for the life of their's, just what can possibly Ms. Dutt be upset about, and lo you have the new Blogging Martyr of the country.

    Mr. Kunte's post was far from being responsible journalism. He could have made the same point in much respectable tone. He used rude language not to forget specific use of the word 'idiot'. If it was only a constructive criticism and not an attention seeking exercise, he could have also avoided taking names altogether. But then am not saying he can't make an opinion, sure he can, but he was so not justified in name calling.

    I am sorry to say this but suddenly the bloggers of the nation have started thinking too highly of themselves when they are just as much guilty of cheap publicity as our MSMedia. You can't expect responsible behaviour from others if you can't show the same yourself. Take for eg. people like one Harshad Joshi here who is going about calling Ms.Dutt a Maggot an ugly face and others simply read and move on. The blog owner also didn't bother to remove such comments which use foul language.

    I understand I am the only dissenting voice here and following this comment name calling would start against me. Just in case people forgot freedom of expression does NOT include name calling. But in my defense, am neither against Kunte nor NDTV. I just think we are making too much noise about it. Because us bloggers are no spotless minds. We are part of the circus just our means are different.

  261. Sanjukta says:

    You guys are all so naive and harmless souls, feels my heart with joy to see the abundance of innocence here, so innocent you are that you just don't get the fact that Mr. Kunte called Ms. Dutt an Idiot. I am guessing according to all you people 'Idiot' is such a sweet name to call, rather harmless freedom of expression. Oh wow such a noble soul Mr. Kunte only next to a saint, so what if he called a fellow woman who is a leading name in her field and has a considerable repute an Idiot.

    Idiocy according to Indian law is a valid condition for nullification of marriages, for denying contractual rights, but hey Barkha Dutt according to Mr. Kunte is an Idiot and so the entire Indian blogsphere, is clueless for the life of their's, just what can possibly Ms. Dutt be upset about, and lo you have the new Blogging Martyr of the country.

    Mr. Kunte's post was far from being responsible journalism. He could have made the same point in much respectable tone. He used rude language not to forget specific use of the word 'idiot'. If it was only a constructive criticism and not an attention seeking exercise, he could have also avoided taking names altogether. But then am not saying he can't make an opinion, sure he can, but he was so not justified in name calling.

    I am sorry to say this but suddenly the bloggers of the nation have started thinking too highly of themselves when they are just as much guilty of cheap publicity as our MSMedia. You can't expect responsible behaviour from others if you can't show the same yourself. Take for eg. people like one Harshad Joshi here who is going about calling Ms.Dutt a Maggot an ugly face and others simply read and move on. The blog owner also didn't bother to remove such comments which use foul language.

    I understand I am the only dissenting voice here and following this comment name calling would start against me. Just in case people forgot freedom of expression does NOT include name calling. But in my defense, am neither against Kunte nor NDTV. I just think we are making too much noise about it. Because us bloggers are no spotless minds. We are part of the circus just our means are different.

  262. Sanjukta says:

    You guys are all so naive and harmless souls, feels my heart with joy to see the abundance of innocence here, so innocent you are that you just don't get the fact that Mr. Kunte called Ms. Dutt an Idiot. I am guessing according to all you people 'Idiot' is such a sweet name to call, rather harmless freedom of expression. Oh wow such a noble soul Mr. Kunte only next to a saint, so what if he called a fellow woman who is a leading name in her field and has a considerable repute an Idiot.

    Idiocy according to Indian law is a valid condition for nullification of marriages, for denying contractual rights, but hey Barkha Dutt according to Mr. Kunte is an Idiot and so the entire Indian blogsphere, is clueless for the life of their's, just what can possibly Ms. Dutt be upset about, and lo you have the new Blogging Martyr of the country.

    Mr. Kunte's post was far from being responsible journalism. He could have made the same point in much respectable tone. He used rude language not to forget specific use of the word 'idiot'. If it was only a constructive criticism and not an attention seeking exercise, he could have also avoided taking names altogether. But then am not saying he can't make an opinion, sure he can, but he was so not justified in name calling.

    I am sorry to say this but suddenly the bloggers of the nation have started thinking too highly of themselves when they are just as much guilty of cheap publicity as our MSMedia. You can't expect responsible behaviour from others if you can't show the same yourself. Take for eg. people like one Harshad Joshi here who is going about calling Ms.Dutt a Maggot an ugly face and others simply read and move on. The blog owner also didn't bother to remove such comments which use foul language.

    I understand I am the only dissenting voice here and following this comment name calling would start against me. Just in case people forgot freedom of expression does NOT include name calling. But in my defense, am neither against Kunte nor NDTV. I just think we are making too much noise about it. Because us bloggers are no spotless minds. We are part of the circus just our means are different.

  263. Sanjukta says:

    You guys are all so naive and harmless souls, feels my heart with joy to see the abundance of innocence here, so innocent you are that you just don't get the fact that Mr. Kunte called Ms. Dutt an Idiot. I am guessing according to all you people 'Idiot' is such a sweet name to call, rather harmless freedom of expression. Oh wow such a noble soul Mr. Kunte only next to a saint, so what if he called a fellow woman who is a leading name in her field and has a considerable repute an Idiot.

    Idiocy according to Indian law is a valid condition for nullification of marriages, for denying contractual rights, but hey Barkha Dutt according to Mr. Kunte is an Idiot and so the entire Indian blogsphere, is clueless for the life of their's, just what can possibly Ms. Dutt be upset about, and lo you have the new Blogging Martyr of the country.

    Mr. Kunte's post was far from being responsible journalism. He could have made the same point in much respectable tone. He used rude language not to forget specific use of the word 'idiot'. If it was only a constructive criticism and not an attention seeking exercise, he could have also avoided taking names altogether. But then am not saying he can't make an opinion, sure he can, but he was so not justified in name calling.

    I am sorry to say this but suddenly the bloggers of the nation have started thinking too highly of themselves when they are just as much guilty of cheap publicity as our MSMedia. You can't expect responsible behaviour from others if you can't show the same yourself. Take for eg. people like one Harshad Joshi here who is going about calling Ms.Dutt a Maggot an ugly face and others simply read and move on. The blog owner also didn't bother to remove such comments which use foul language.

    I understand I am the only dissenting voice here and following this comment name calling would start against me. Just in case people forgot freedom of expression does NOT include name calling. But in my defense, am neither against Kunte nor NDTV. I just think we are making too much noise about it. Because us bloggers are no spotless minds. We are part of the circus just our means are different.

  264. Sanjukta says:

    You guys are all so naive and harmless souls, feels my heart with joy to see the abundance of innocence here, so innocent you are that you just don't get the fact that Mr. Kunte called Ms. Dutt an Idiot. I am guessing according to all you people 'Idiot' is such a sweet name to call, rather harmless freedom of expression. Oh wow such a noble soul Mr. Kunte only next to a saint, so what if he called a fellow woman who is a leading name in her field and has a considerable repute an Idiot.

    Idiocy according to Indian law is a valid condition for nullification of marriages, for denying contractual rights, but hey Barkha Dutt according to Mr. Kunte is an Idiot and so the entire Indian blogsphere, is clueless for the life of their's, just what can possibly Ms. Dutt be upset about, and lo you have the new Blogging Martyr of the country.

    Mr. Kunte's post was far from being responsible journalism. He could have made the same point in much respectable tone. He used rude language not to forget specific use of the word 'idiot'. If it was only a constructive criticism and not an attention seeking exercise, he could have also avoided taking names altogether. But then am not saying he can't make an opinion, sure he can, but he was so not justified in name calling.

    I am sorry to say this but suddenly the bloggers of the nation have started thinking too highly of themselves when they are just as much guilty of cheap publicity as our MSMedia. You can't expect responsible behaviour from others if you can't show the same yourself. Take for eg. people like one Harshad Joshi here who is going about calling Ms.Dutt a Maggot an ugly face and others simply read and move on. The blog owner also didn't bother to remove such comments which use foul language.

    I understand I am the only dissenting voice here and following this comment name calling would start against me. Just in case people forgot freedom of expression does NOT include name calling. But in my defense, am neither against Kunte nor NDTV. I just think we are making too much noise about it. Because us bloggers are no spotless minds. We are part of the circus just our means are different.

  265. Sanjukta says:

    You guys are all so naive and harmless souls, feels my heart with joy to see the abundance of innocence here, so innocent you are that you just don't get the fact that Mr. Kunte called Ms. Dutt an Idiot. I am guessing according to all you people 'Idiot' is such a sweet name to call, rather harmless freedom of expression. Oh wow such a noble soul Mr. Kunte only next to a saint, so what if he called a fellow woman who is a leading name in her field and has a considerable repute an Idiot.

    Idiocy according to Indian law is a valid condition for nullification of marriages, for denying contractual rights, but hey Barkha Dutt according to Mr. Kunte is an Idiot and so the entire Indian blogsphere, is clueless for the life of their's, just what can possibly Ms. Dutt be upset about, and lo you have the new Blogging Martyr of the country.

    Mr. Kunte's post was far from being responsible journalism. He could have made the same point in much respectable tone. He used rude language not to forget specific use of the word 'idiot'. If it was only a constructive criticism and not an attention seeking exercise, he could have also avoided taking names altogether. But then am not saying he can't make an opinion, sure he can, but he was so not justified in name calling.

    I am sorry to say this but suddenly the bloggers of the nation have started thinking too highly of themselves when they are just as much guilty of cheap publicity as our MSMedia. You can't expect responsible behaviour from others if you can't show the same yourself. Take for eg. people like one Harshad Joshi here who is going about calling Ms.Dutt a Maggot an ugly face and others simply read and move on. The blog owner also didn't bother to remove such comments which use foul language.

    I understand I am the only dissenting voice here and following this comment name calling would start against me. Just in case people forgot freedom of expression does NOT include name calling. But in my defense, am neither against Kunte nor NDTV. I just think we are making too much noise about it. Because us bloggers are no spotless minds. We are part of the circus just our means are different.

  266. Sanjukta says:

    You guys are all so naive and harmless souls, feels my heart with joy to see the abundance of innocence here, so innocent you are that you just don't get the fact that Mr. Kunte called Ms. Dutt an Idiot. I am guessing according to all you people 'Idiot' is such a sweet name to call, rather harmless freedom of expression. Oh wow such a noble soul Mr. Kunte only next to a saint, so what if he called a fellow woman who is a leading name in her field and has a considerable repute an Idiot.

    Idiocy according to Indian law is a valid condition for nullification of marriages, for denying contractual rights, but hey Barkha Dutt according to Mr. Kunte is an Idiot and so the entire Indian blogsphere, is clueless for the life of their's, just what can possibly Ms. Dutt be upset about, and lo you have the new Blogging Martyr of the country.

    Mr. Kunte's post was far from being responsible journalism. He could have made the same point in much respectable tone. He used rude language not to forget specific use of the word 'idiot'. If it was only a constructive criticism and not an attention seeking exercise, he could have also avoided taking names altogether. But then am not saying he can't make an opinion, sure he can, but he was so not justified in name calling.

    I am sorry to say this but suddenly the bloggers of the nation have started thinking too highly of themselves when they are just as much guilty of cheap publicity as our MSMedia. You can't expect responsible behaviour from others if you can't show the same yourself. Take for eg. people like one Harshad Joshi here who is going about calling Ms.Dutt a Maggot an ugly face and others simply read and move on. The blog owner also didn't bother to remove such comments which use foul language.

    I understand I am the only dissenting voice here and following this comment name calling would start against me. Just in case people forgot freedom of expression does NOT include name calling. But in my defense, am neither against Kunte nor NDTV. I just think we are making too much noise about it. Because us bloggers are no spotless minds. We are part of the circus just our means are different.

  267. Sanjukta says:

    You guys are all so naive and harmless souls, feels my heart with joy to see the abundance of innocence here, so innocent you are that you just don't get the fact that Mr. Kunte called Ms. Dutt an Idiot. I am guessing according to all you people 'Idiot' is such a sweet name to call, rather harmless freedom of expression. Oh wow such a noble soul Mr. Kunte only next to a saint, so what if he called a fellow woman who is a leading name in her field and has a considerable repute an Idiot.

    Idiocy according to Indian law is a valid condition for nullification of marriages, for denying contractual rights, but hey Barkha Dutt according to Mr. Kunte is an Idiot and so the entire Indian blogsphere, is clueless for the life of their's, just what can possibly Ms. Dutt be upset about, and lo you have the new Blogging Martyr of the country.

    Mr. Kunte's post was far from being responsible journalism. He could have made the same point in much respectable tone. He used rude language not to forget specific use of the word 'idiot'. If it was only a constructive criticism and not an attention seeking exercise, he could have also avoided taking names altogether. But then am not saying he can't make an opinion, sure he can, but he was so not justified in name calling.

    I am sorry to say this but suddenly the bloggers of the nation have started thinking too highly of themselves when they are just as much guilty of cheap publicity as our MSMedia. You can't expect responsible behaviour from others if you can't show the same yourself. Take for eg. people like one Harshad Joshi here who is going about calling Ms.Dutt a Maggot an ugly face and others simply read and move on. The blog owner also didn't bother to remove such comments which use foul language.

    I understand I am the only dissenting voice here and following this comment name calling would start against me. Just in case people forgot freedom of expression does NOT include name calling. But in my defense, am neither against Kunte nor NDTV. I just think we are making too much noise about it. Because us bloggers are no spotless minds. We are part of the circus just our means are different.

  268. This 'end' was like the one in RDB…

    We cant accept 'ends' like these anymore!

    No more!!

    Nvere!!!

  269. This 'end' was like the one in RDB…

    We cant accept 'ends' like these anymore!

    No more!!

    Nvere!!!

  270. This 'end' was like the one in RDB…

    We cant accept 'ends' like these anymore!

    No more!!

    Nvere!!!

  271. This 'end' was like the one in RDB…

    We cant accept 'ends' like these anymore!

    No more!!

    Nvere!!!

  272. This 'end' was like the one in RDB…

    We cant accept 'ends' like these anymore!

    No more!!

    Nvere!!!

  273. This 'end' was like the one in RDB…

    We cant accept 'ends' like these anymore!

    No more!!

    Nvere!!!

  274. This 'end' was like the one in RDB…

    We cant accept 'ends' like these anymore!

    No more!!

    Nvere!!!

  275. This 'end' was like the one in RDB…

    We cant accept 'ends' like these anymore!

    No more!!

    Nvere!!!

  276. This 'end' was like the one in RDB…

    We cant accept 'ends' like these anymore!

    No more!!

    Nvere!!!

  277. This 'end' was like the one in RDB…

    We cant accept 'ends' like these anymore!

    No more!!

    Nvere!!!

  278. whackjob says:

    Oh yeah, let the honchos at ndtv hear it loud and clear. we at blogosphere are not happy with her sending a pack of lawyers hounds after people who dont agree with her brand of journalism- loud, sensational and intolerant. You wont pull a dirty trick like this and expect people to take it lying down. expect more bitter in future. regards

  279. whackjob says:

    Oh yeah, let the honchos at ndtv hear it loud and clear. we at blogosphere are not happy with her sending a pack of lawyers hounds after people who dont agree with her brand of journalism- loud, sensational and intolerant. You wont pull a dirty trick like this and expect people to take it lying down. expect more bitter in future. regards

  280. whackjob says:

    Oh yeah, let the honchos at ndtv hear it loud and clear. we at blogosphere are not happy with her sending a pack of lawyers hounds after people who dont agree with her brand of journalism- loud, sensational and intolerant. You wont pull a dirty trick like this and expect people to take it lying down. expect more bitter in future. regards

  281. whackjob says:

    Oh yeah, let the honchos at ndtv hear it loud and clear. we at blogosphere are not happy with her sending a pack of lawyers hounds after people who dont agree with her brand of journalism- loud, sensational and intolerant. You wont pull a dirty trick like this and expect people to take it lying down. expect more bitter in future. regards

  282. whackjob says:

    Oh yeah, let the honchos at ndtv hear it loud and clear. we at blogosphere are not happy with her sending a pack of lawyers hounds after people who dont agree with her brand of journalism- loud, sensational and intolerant. You wont pull a dirty trick like this and expect people to take it lying down. expect more bitter in future. regards

  283. whackjob says:

    Oh yeah, let the honchos at ndtv hear it loud and clear. we at blogosphere are not happy with her sending a pack of lawyers hounds after people who dont agree with her brand of journalism- loud, sensational and intolerant. You wont pull a dirty trick like this and expect people to take it lying down. expect more bitter in future. regards

  284. whackjob says:

    Oh yeah, let the honchos at ndtv hear it loud and clear. we at blogosphere are not happy with her sending a pack of lawyers hounds after people who dont agree with her brand of journalism- loud, sensational and intolerant. You wont pull a dirty trick like this and expect people to take it lying down. expect more bitter in future. regards

  285. whackjob says:

    Oh yeah, let the honchos at ndtv hear it loud and clear. we at blogosphere are not happy with her sending a pack of lawyers hounds after people who dont agree with her brand of journalism- loud, sensational and intolerant. You wont pull a dirty trick like this and expect people to take it lying down. expect more bitter in future. regards

  286. whackjob says:

    Oh yeah, let the honchos at ndtv hear it loud and clear. we at blogosphere are not happy with her sending a pack of lawyers hounds after people who dont agree with her brand of journalism- loud, sensational and intolerant. You wont pull a dirty trick like this and expect people to take it lying down. expect more bitter in future. regards

  287. whackjob says:

    Oh yeah, let the honchos at ndtv hear it loud and clear. we at blogosphere are not happy with her sending a pack of lawyers hounds after people who dont agree with her brand of journalism- loud, sensational and intolerant. You wont pull a dirty trick like this and expect people to take it lying down. expect more bitter in future. regards

  288. whackjob says:

    Lets call it another shoddy behaviour of ms barkha dutt and ndtv or better shoddygate.

    I hope ndtv viewers would give it a second thought before flipping it on next time, just pathetic.

    tell me if there is a way i can cancel remove ndtv from tata sky i will much appreciate it.

  289. whackjob says:

    Lets call it another shoddy behaviour of ms barkha dutt and ndtv or better shoddygate.

    I hope ndtv viewers would give it a second thought before flipping it on next time, just pathetic.

    tell me if there is a way i can cancel remove ndtv from tata sky i will much appreciate it.

  290. whackjob says:

    Lets call it another shoddy behaviour of ms barkha dutt and ndtv or better shoddygate.

    I hope ndtv viewers would give it a second thought before flipping it on next time, just pathetic.

    tell me if there is a way i can cancel remove ndtv from tata sky i will much appreciate it.

  291. whackjob says:

    Lets call it another shoddy behaviour of ms barkha dutt and ndtv or better shoddygate.

    I hope ndtv viewers would give it a second thought before flipping it on next time, just pathetic.

    tell me if there is a way i can cancel remove ndtv from tata sky i will much appreciate it.

  292. whackjob says:

    Lets call it another shoddy behaviour of ms barkha dutt and ndtv or better shoddygate.

    I hope ndtv viewers would give it a second thought before flipping it on next time, just pathetic.

    tell me if there is a way i can cancel remove ndtv from tata sky i will much appreciate it.

  293. whackjob says:

    Lets call it another shoddy behaviour of ms barkha dutt and ndtv or better shoddygate.

    I hope ndtv viewers would give it a second thought before flipping it on next time, just pathetic.

    tell me if there is a way i can cancel remove ndtv from tata sky i will much appreciate it.

  294. whackjob says:

    Lets call it another shoddy behaviour of ms barkha dutt and ndtv or better shoddygate.

    I hope ndtv viewers would give it a second thought before flipping it on next time, just pathetic.

    tell me if there is a way i can cancel remove ndtv from tata sky i will much appreciate it.

  295. whackjob says:

    Lets call it another shoddy behaviour of ms barkha dutt and ndtv or better shoddygate.

    I hope ndtv viewers would give it a second thought before flipping it on next time, just pathetic.

    tell me if there is a way i can cancel remove ndtv from tata sky i will much appreciate it.

  296. whackjob says:

    Lets call it another shoddy behaviour of ms barkha dutt and ndtv or better shoddygate.

    I hope ndtv viewers would give it a second thought before flipping it on next time, just pathetic.

    tell me if there is a way i can cancel remove ndtv from tata sky i will much appreciate it.

  297. whackjob says:

    Lets call it another shoddy behaviour of ms barkha dutt and ndtv or better shoddygate.

    I hope ndtv viewers would give it a second thought before flipping it on next time, just pathetic.

    tell me if there is a way i can cancel remove ndtv from tata sky i will much appreciate it.

  298. Dr Zen says:

    Sanjukta, here's a haiku for you

    An empty mind
    Illusion or peace
    Jobless?..

    I think you should stop targeting others Each time you comment on someone's blog, you just show up that you have a crooked mind. It shows that you are just desperate to settle your personal scores with people. Please dont wash your dirty linen in public. You seem to have your own worthless blog running somewhere…

    If you dont cease your failing attempts at targeting people, we will take strict action against you by marking your blog(s) as spam. And no court will save you from it. Thats a promise….

  299. Dr Zen says:

    Sanjukta, here's a haiku for you

    An empty mind
    Illusion or peace
    Jobless?..

    I think you should stop targeting others Each time you comment on someone's blog, you just show up that you have a crooked mind. It shows that you are just desperate to settle your personal scores with people. Please dont wash your dirty linen in public. You seem to have your own worthless blog running somewhere…

    If you dont cease your failing attempts at targeting people, we will take strict action against you by marking your blog(s) as spam. And no court will save you from it. Thats a promise….

  300. Dr Zen says:

    Sanjukta, here's a haiku for you

    An empty mind
    Illusion or peace
    Jobless?..

    I think you should stop targeting others Each time you comment on someone's blog, you just show up that you have a crooked mind. It shows that you are just desperate to settle your personal scores with people. Please dont wash your dirty linen in public. You seem to have your own worthless blog running somewhere…

    If you dont cease your failing attempts at targeting people, we will take strict action against you by marking your blog(s) as spam. And no court will save you from it. Thats a promise….

  301. Dr Zen says:

    Sanjukta, here's a haiku for you

    An empty mind
    Illusion or peace
    Jobless?..

    I think you should stop targeting others Each time you comment on someone's blog, you just show up that you have a crooked mind. It shows that you are just desperate to settle your personal scores with people. Please dont wash your dirty linen in public. You seem to have your own worthless blog running somewhere…

    If you dont cease your failing attempts at targeting people, we will take strict action against you by marking your blog(s) as spam. And no court will save you from it. Thats a promise….

  302. Dr Zen says:

    Sanjukta, here's a haiku for you

    An empty mind
    Illusion or peace
    Jobless?..

    I think you should stop targeting others Each time you comment on someone's blog, you just show up that you have a crooked mind. It shows that you are just desperate to settle your personal scores with people. Please dont wash your dirty linen in public. You seem to have your own worthless blog running somewhere…

    If you dont cease your failing attempts at targeting people, we will take strict action against you by marking your blog(s) as spam. And no court will save you from it. Thats a promise….

  303. Dr Zen says:

    Sanjukta, here's a haiku for you

    An empty mind
    Illusion or peace
    Jobless?..

    I think you should stop targeting others Each time you comment on someone's blog, you just show up that you have a crooked mind. It shows that you are just desperate to settle your personal scores with people. Please dont wash your dirty linen in public. You seem to have your own worthless blog running somewhere…

    If you dont cease your failing attempts at targeting people, we will take strict action against you by marking your blog(s) as spam. And no court will save you from it. Thats a promise….

  304. Dr Zen says:

    Sanjukta, here's a haiku for you

    An empty mind
    Illusion or peace
    Jobless?..

    I think you should stop targeting others Each time you comment on someone's blog, you just show up that you have a crooked mind. It shows that you are just desperate to settle your personal scores with people. Please dont wash your dirty linen in public. You seem to have your own worthless blog running somewhere…

    If you dont cease your failing attempts at targeting people, we will take strict action against you by marking your blog(s) as spam. And no court will save you from it. Thats a promise….

  305. Dr Zen says:

    Sanjukta, here's a haiku for you

    An empty mind
    Illusion or peace
    Jobless?..

    I think you should stop targeting others Each time you comment on someone's blog, you just show up that you have a crooked mind. It shows that you are just desperate to settle your personal scores with people. Please dont wash your dirty linen in public. You seem to have your own worthless blog running somewhere…

    If you dont cease your failing attempts at targeting people, we will take strict action against you by marking your blog(s) as spam. And no court will save you from it. Thats a promise….

  306. Dr Zen says:

    Sanjukta, here's a haiku for you

    An empty mind
    Illusion or peace
    Jobless?..

    I think you should stop targeting others Each time you comment on someone's blog, you just show up that you have a crooked mind. It shows that you are just desperate to settle your personal scores with people. Please dont wash your dirty linen in public. You seem to have your own worthless blog running somewhere…

    If you dont cease your failing attempts at targeting people, we will take strict action against you by marking your blog(s) as spam. And no court will save you from it. Thats a promise….

  307. hiralove says:

    It was meant to happen .. these top journalists just want to be on top .. and this is the way they do it .. I totally agree with your opinions .. and i like the way the whole thing ended .. Now the real thing is going to come, People will become more aware what's happening and there will be no misguides from The IDIOT BOX …. Barkha Dutt has sure declined with this hobnob .. and its just the started ..

  308. hiralove says:

    It was meant to happen .. these top journalists just want to be on top .. and this is the way they do it .. I totally agree with your opinions .. and i like the way the whole thing ended .. Now the real thing is going to come, People will become more aware what's happening and there will be no misguides from The IDIOT BOX …. Barkha Dutt has sure declined with this hobnob .. and its just the started ..

  309. hiralove says:

    It was meant to happen .. these top journalists just want to be on top .. and this is the way they do it .. I totally agree with your opinions .. and i like the way the whole thing ended .. Now the real thing is going to come, People will become more aware what's happening and there will be no misguides from The IDIOT BOX …. Barkha Dutt has sure declined with this hobnob .. and its just the started ..

  310. hiralove says:

    It was meant to happen .. these top journalists just want to be on top .. and this is the way they do it .. I totally agree with your opinions .. and i like the way the whole thing ended .. Now the real thing is going to come, People will become more aware what's happening and there will be no misguides from The IDIOT BOX …. Barkha Dutt has sure declined with this hobnob .. and its just the started ..

  311. hiralove says:

    It was meant to happen .. these top journalists just want to be on top .. and this is the way they do it .. I totally agree with your opinions .. and i like the way the whole thing ended .. Now the real thing is going to come, People will become more aware what's happening and there will be no misguides from The IDIOT BOX …. Barkha Dutt has sure declined with this hobnob .. and its just the started ..

  312. hiralove says:

    It was meant to happen .. these top journalists just want to be on top .. and this is the way they do it .. I totally agree with your opinions .. and i like the way the whole thing ended .. Now the real thing is going to come, People will become more aware what's happening and there will be no misguides from The IDIOT BOX …. Barkha Dutt has sure declined with this hobnob .. and its just the started ..

  313. hiralove says:

    It was meant to happen .. these top journalists just want to be on top .. and this is the way they do it .. I totally agree with your opinions .. and i like the way the whole thing ended .. Now the real thing is going to come, People will become more aware what's happening and there will be no misguides from The IDIOT BOX …. Barkha Dutt has sure declined with this hobnob .. and its just the started ..

  314. hiralove says:

    It was meant to happen .. these top journalists just want to be on top .. and this is the way they do it .. I totally agree with your opinions .. and i like the way the whole thing ended .. Now the real thing is going to come, People will become more aware what's happening and there will be no misguides from The IDIOT BOX …. Barkha Dutt has sure declined with this hobnob .. and its just the started ..

  315. hiralove says:

    It was meant to happen .. these top journalists just want to be on top .. and this is the way they do it .. I totally agree with your opinions .. and i like the way the whole thing ended .. Now the real thing is going to come, People will become more aware what's happening and there will be no misguides from The IDIOT BOX …. Barkha Dutt has sure declined with this hobnob .. and its just the started ..

  316. hiralove says:

    It was meant to happen .. these top journalists just want to be on top .. and this is the way they do it .. I totally agree with your opinions .. and i like the way the whole thing ended .. Now the real thing is going to come, People will become more aware what's happening and there will be no misguides from The IDIOT BOX …. Barkha Dutt has sure declined with this hobnob .. and its just the started ..

  317. Jokingly Serious says:

    Barkha Dutt is one over hyped- I-am-a-feminist kind journalist who thinks that she is the undisputed queen on Indian television, ha and there are people who watch NDTV. But then what else do we have eh? we have Rajdeep Sardesai blowing his trumpet incessantly or the Hindi channels showing us latest WWE updates.
    To cut a long story short Indian television media is plain non-sense, they have done more harm than good. To adorn these cheapos there are awards which confer a particular channel to be the best and the rest to be equally good . I'm reminded of the story where a King confers titles upon himself and in the end is stoned to death(well there is no such story I just made that up )

  318. Jokingly Serious says:

    Barkha Dutt is one over hyped- I-am-a-feminist kind journalist who thinks that she is the undisputed queen on Indian television, ha and there are people who watch NDTV. But then what else do we have eh? we have Rajdeep Sardesai blowing his trumpet incessantly or the Hindi channels showing us latest WWE updates.
    To cut a long story short Indian television media is plain non-sense, they have done more harm than good. To adorn these cheapos there are awards which confer a particular channel to be the best and the rest to be equally good . I'm reminded of the story where a King confers titles upon himself and in the end is stoned to death(well there is no such story I just made that up )

  319. Jokingly Serious says:

    Barkha Dutt is one over hyped- I-am-a-feminist kind journalist who thinks that she is the undisputed queen on Indian television, ha and there are people who watch NDTV. But then what else do we have eh? we have Rajdeep Sardesai blowing his trumpet incessantly or the Hindi channels showing us latest WWE updates.
    To cut a long story short Indian television media is plain non-sense, they have done more harm than good. To adorn these cheapos there are awards which confer a particular channel to be the best and the rest to be equally good . I'm reminded of the story where a King confers titles upon himself and in the end is stoned to death(well there is no such story I just made that up )

  320. Jokingly Serious says:

    Barkha Dutt is one over hyped- I-am-a-feminist kind journalist who thinks that she is the undisputed queen on Indian television, ha and there are people who watch NDTV. But then what else do we have eh? we have Rajdeep Sardesai blowing his trumpet incessantly or the Hindi channels showing us latest WWE updates.
    To cut a long story short Indian television media is plain non-sense, they have done more harm than good. To adorn these cheapos there are awards which confer a particular channel to be the best and the rest to be equally good . I'm reminded of the story where a King confers titles upon himself and in the end is stoned to death(well there is no such story I just made that up )

  321. Jokingly Serious says:

    Barkha Dutt is one over hyped- I-am-a-feminist kind journalist who thinks that she is the undisputed queen on Indian television, ha and there are people who watch NDTV. But then what else do we have eh? we have Rajdeep Sardesai blowing his trumpet incessantly or the Hindi channels showing us latest WWE updates.
    To cut a long story short Indian television media is plain non-sense, they have done more harm than good. To adorn these cheapos there are awards which confer a particular channel to be the best and the rest to be equally good . I'm reminded of the story where a King confers titles upon himself and in the end is stoned to death(well there is no such story I just made that up )

  322. Jokingly Serious says:

    Barkha Dutt is one over hyped- I-am-a-feminist kind journalist who thinks that she is the undisputed queen on Indian television, ha and there are people who watch NDTV. But then what else do we have eh? we have Rajdeep Sardesai blowing his trumpet incessantly or the Hindi channels showing us latest WWE updates.
    To cut a long story short Indian television media is plain non-sense, they have done more harm than good. To adorn these cheapos there are awards which confer a particular channel to be the best and the rest to be equally good . I'm reminded of the story where a King confers titles upon himself and in the end is stoned to death(well there is no such story I just made that up )

  323. Jokingly Serious says:

    Barkha Dutt is one over hyped- I-am-a-feminist kind journalist who thinks that she is the undisputed queen on Indian television, ha and there are people who watch NDTV. But then what else do we have eh? we have Rajdeep Sardesai blowing his trumpet incessantly or the Hindi channels showing us latest WWE updates.
    To cut a long story short Indian television media is plain non-sense, they have done more harm than good. To adorn these cheapos there are awards which confer a particular channel to be the best and the rest to be equally good . I'm reminded of the story where a King confers titles upon himself and in the end is stoned to death(well there is no such story I just made that up )

  324. Jokingly Serious says:

    Barkha Dutt is one over hyped- I-am-a-feminist kind journalist who thinks that she is the undisputed queen on Indian television, ha and there are people who watch NDTV. But then what else do we have eh? we have Rajdeep Sardesai blowing his trumpet incessantly or the Hindi channels showing us latest WWE updates.
    To cut a long story short Indian television media is plain non-sense, they have done more harm than good. To adorn these cheapos there are awards which confer a particular channel to be the best and the rest to be equally good . I'm reminded of the story where a King confers titles upon himself and in the end is stoned to death(well there is no such story I just made that up )

  325. Jokingly Serious says:

    Barkha Dutt is one over hyped- I-am-a-feminist kind journalist who thinks that she is the undisputed queen on Indian television, ha and there are people who watch NDTV. But then what else do we have eh? we have Rajdeep Sardesai blowing his trumpet incessantly or the Hindi channels showing us latest WWE updates.
    To cut a long story short Indian television media is plain non-sense, they have done more harm than good. To adorn these cheapos there are awards which confer a particular channel to be the best and the rest to be equally good . I'm reminded of the story where a King confers titles upon himself and in the end is stoned to death(well there is no such story I just made that up )

  326. Jokingly Serious says:

    Barkha Dutt is one over hyped- I-am-a-feminist kind journalist who thinks that she is the undisputed queen on Indian television, ha and there are people who watch NDTV. But then what else do we have eh? we have Rajdeep Sardesai blowing his trumpet incessantly or the Hindi channels showing us latest WWE updates.
    To cut a long story short Indian television media is plain non-sense, they have done more harm than good. To adorn these cheapos there are awards which confer a particular channel to be the best and the rest to be equally good . I'm reminded of the story where a King confers titles upon himself and in the end is stoned to death(well there is no such story I just made that up )

  327. binoymuzumder says:

    dear
    Madam
    I am tareque kazi ,unable to find correct website am addressing u through this.I have made a documentary on 115years old sufi festival(mela)in west bengal .I came to know that your channel 24x7ndtv is telecasting this type of documentary.I want to sell my documentary to you, please inform me the rules &regulation.
    thanking u
    tareque kazi
    kazi.tareque@gmail.com

  328. binoymuzumder says:

    dear
    Madam
    I am tareque kazi ,unable to find correct website am addressing u through this.I have made a documentary on 115years old sufi festival(mela)in west bengal .I came to know that your channel 24x7ndtv is telecasting this type of documentary.I want to sell my documentary to you, please inform me the rules &regulation.
    thanking u
    tareque kazi
    kazi.tareque@gmail.com

  329. binoymuzumder says:

    dear
    Madam
    I am tareque kazi ,unable to find correct website am addressing u through this.I have made a documentary on 115years old sufi festival(mela)in west bengal .I came to know that your channel 24x7ndtv is telecasting this type of documentary.I want to sell my documentary to you, please inform me the rules &regulation.
    thanking u
    tareque kazi
    kazi.tareque@gmail.com

  330. binoymuzumder says:

    dear
    Madam
    I am tareque kazi ,unable to find correct website am addressing u through this.I have made a documentary on 115years old sufi festival(mela)in west bengal .I came to know that your channel 24x7ndtv is telecasting this type of documentary.I want to sell my documentary to you, please inform me the rules &regulation.
    thanking u
    tareque kazi
    kazi.tareque@gmail.com

  331. binoymuzumder says:

    dear
    Madam
    I am tareque kazi ,unable to find correct website am addressing u through this.I have made a documentary on 115years old sufi festival(mela)in west bengal .I came to know that your channel 24x7ndtv is telecasting this type of documentary.I want to sell my documentary to you, please inform me the rules &regulation.
    thanking u
    tareque kazi
    kazi.tareque@gmail.com

  332. binoymuzumder says:

    dear
    Madam
    I am tareque kazi ,unable to find correct website am addressing u through this.I have made a documentary on 115years old sufi festival(mela)in west bengal .I came to know that your channel 24x7ndtv is telecasting this type of documentary.I want to sell my documentary to you, please inform me the rules &regulation.
    thanking u
    tareque kazi
    kazi.tareque@gmail.com

  333. binoymuzumder says:

    dear
    Madam
    I am tareque kazi ,unable to find correct website am addressing u through this.I have made a documentary on 115years old sufi festival(mela)in west bengal .I came to know that your channel 24x7ndtv is telecasting this type of documentary.I want to sell my documentary to you, please inform me the rules &regulation.
    thanking u
    tareque kazi
    kazi.tareque@gmail.com

  334. binoymuzumder says:

    dear
    Madam
    I am tareque kazi ,unable to find correct website am addressing u through this.I have made a documentary on 115years old sufi festival(mela)in west bengal .I came to know that your channel 24x7ndtv is telecasting this type of documentary.I want to sell my documentary to you, please inform me the rules &regulation.
    thanking u
    tareque kazi
    kazi.tareque@gmail.com

  335. binoymuzumder says:

    dear
    Madam
    I am tareque kazi ,unable to find correct website am addressing u through this.I have made a documentary on 115years old sufi festival(mela)in west bengal .I came to know that your channel 24x7ndtv is telecasting this type of documentary.I want to sell my documentary to you, please inform me the rules &regulation.
    thanking u
    tareque kazi
    kazi.tareque@gmail.com

  336. binoymuzumder says:

    dear
    Madam
    I am tareque kazi ,unable to find correct website am addressing u through this.I have made a documentary on 115years old sufi festival(mela)in west bengal .I came to know that your channel 24x7ndtv is telecasting this type of documentary.I want to sell my documentary to you, please inform me the rules &regulation.
    thanking u
    tareque kazi
    kazi.tareque@gmail.com

  337. pkr says:

    @Dr Zen,

    Thats an extremely coherent and articulate reply, which only focussed on the argument at hand without harping on the person who made the argument. Pretty much like most of the criticism targeted at Ms Dutt.

  338. pkr says:

    @Dr Zen,

    Thats an extremely coherent and articulate reply, which only focussed on the argument at hand without harping on the person who made the argument. Pretty much like most of the criticism targeted at Ms Dutt.

  339. pkr says:

    @Dr Zen,

    Thats an extremely coherent and articulate reply, which only focussed on the argument at hand without harping on the person who made the argument. Pretty much like most of the criticism targeted at Ms Dutt.

  340. pkr says:

    @Dr Zen,

    Thats an extremely coherent and articulate reply, which only focussed on the argument at hand without harping on the person who made the argument. Pretty much like most of the criticism targeted at Ms Dutt.

  341. pkr says:

    @Dr Zen,

    Thats an extremely coherent and articulate reply, which only focussed on the argument at hand without harping on the person who made the argument. Pretty much like most of the criticism targeted at Ms Dutt.

  342. pkr says:

    @Dr Zen,

    Thats an extremely coherent and articulate reply, which only focussed on the argument at hand without harping on the person who made the argument. Pretty much like most of the criticism targeted at Ms Dutt.

  343. pkr says:

    @Dr Zen,

    Thats an extremely coherent and articulate reply, which only focussed on the argument at hand without harping on the person who made the argument. Pretty much like most of the criticism targeted at Ms Dutt.

  344. pkr says:

    @Dr Zen,

    Thats an extremely coherent and articulate reply, which only focussed on the argument at hand without harping on the person who made the argument. Pretty much like most of the criticism targeted at Ms Dutt.

  345. pkr says:

    @Dr Zen,

    Thats an extremely coherent and articulate reply, which only focussed on the argument at hand without harping on the person who made the argument. Pretty much like most of the criticism targeted at Ms Dutt.

  346. pkr says:

    @Dr Zen,

    Thats an extremely coherent and articulate reply, which only focussed on the argument at hand without harping on the person who made the argument. Pretty much like most of the criticism targeted at Ms Dutt.

  347. Pingback: Linq to India
  348. pkr says:

    Lets not get ahead of ourselves here, most of the blogging in India is not original, even during the Mumbai attacks the bloggers “covering” the event were only posting links to various newspapers and other news websites only, so no, don't claim that you are the voice of people or something grand like that.

    Coming back to Ms Dutt and her critics in the Indian blogosphere, its seems that a lot of criticism of her personality originates in the right wing a.k.a Hindutatva blogs(and their comment sections) and most of the times degenerates to a very personal level. The reason for this is a bit complicated and has more to do with her association with NDTV than anything else.

    Also if the aforementioned blogger was so confident about the accuracy of his claims, I don't know why he didn't stood up for it. This is India not US, civil cases can be fought in India without much expense and from the “support” he seems to have I think he could have start a support campaign also.

  349. pkr says:

    Lets not get ahead of ourselves here, most of the blogging in India is not original, even during the Mumbai attacks the bloggers “covering” the event were only posting links to various newspapers and other news websites only, so no, don't claim that you are the voice of people or something grand like that.

    Coming back to Ms Dutt and her critics in the Indian blogosphere, its seems that a lot of criticism of her personality originates in the right wing a.k.a Hindutatva blogs(and their comment sections) and most of the times degenerates to a very personal level. The reason for this is a bit complicated and has more to do with her association with NDTV than anything else.

    Also if the aforementioned blogger was so confident about the accuracy of his claims, I don't know why he didn't stood up for it. This is India not US, civil cases can be fought in India without much expense and from the “support” he seems to have I think he could have start a support campaign also.

  350. pkr says:

    Lets not get ahead of ourselves here, most of the blogging in India is not original, even during the Mumbai attacks the bloggers “covering” the event were only posting links to various newspapers and other news websites only, so no, don't claim that you are the voice of people or something grand like that.

    Coming back to Ms Dutt and her critics in the Indian blogosphere, its seems that a lot of criticism of her personality originates in the right wing a.k.a Hindutatva blogs(and their comment sections) and most of the times degenerates to a very personal level. The reason for this is a bit complicated and has more to do with her association with NDTV than anything else.

    Also if the aforementioned blogger was so confident about the accuracy of his claims, I don't know why he didn't stood up for it. This is India not US, civil cases can be fought in India without much expense and from the “support” he seems to have I think he could have start a support campaign also.

  351. pkr says:

    Lets not get ahead of ourselves here, most of the blogging in India is not original, even during the Mumbai attacks the bloggers “covering” the event were only posting links to various newspapers and other news websites only, so no, don't claim that you are the voice of people or something grand like that.

    Coming back to Ms Dutt and her critics in the Indian blogosphere, its seems that a lot of criticism of her personality originates in the right wing a.k.a Hindutatva blogs(and their comment sections) and most of the times degenerates to a very personal level. The reason for this is a bit complicated and has more to do with her association with NDTV than anything else.

    Also if the aforementioned blogger was so confident about the accuracy of his claims, I don't know why he didn't stood up for it. This is India not US, civil cases can be fought in India without much expense and from the “support” he seems to have I think he could have start a support campaign also.

  352. pkr says:

    Lets not get ahead of ourselves here, most of the blogging in India is not original, even during the Mumbai attacks the bloggers “covering” the event were only posting links to various newspapers and other news websites only, so no, don't claim that you are the voice of people or something grand like that.

    Coming back to Ms Dutt and her critics in the Indian blogosphere, its seems that a lot of criticism of her personality originates in the right wing a.k.a Hindutatva blogs(and their comment sections) and most of the times degenerates to a very personal level. The reason for this is a bit complicated and has more to do with her association with NDTV than anything else.

    Also if the aforementioned blogger was so confident about the accuracy of his claims, I don't know why he didn't stood up for it. This is India not US, civil cases can be fought in India without much expense and from the “support” he seems to have I think he could have start a support campaign also.

  353. pkr says:

    Lets not get ahead of ourselves here, most of the blogging in India is not original, even during the Mumbai attacks the bloggers “covering” the event were only posting links to various newspapers and other news websites only, so no, don't claim that you are the voice of people or something grand like that.

    Coming back to Ms Dutt and her critics in the Indian blogosphere, its seems that a lot of criticism of her personality originates in the right wing a.k.a Hindutatva blogs(and their comment sections) and most of the times degenerates to a very personal level. The reason for this is a bit complicated and has more to do with her association with NDTV than anything else.

    Also if the aforementioned blogger was so confident about the accuracy of his claims, I don't know why he didn't stood up for it. This is India not US, civil cases can be fought in India without much expense and from the “support” he seems to have I think he could have start a support campaign also.

  354. pkr says:

    Lets not get ahead of ourselves here, most of the blogging in India is not original, even during the Mumbai attacks the bloggers “covering” the event were only posting links to various newspapers and other news websites only, so no, don't claim that you are the voice of people or something grand like that.

    Coming back to Ms Dutt and her critics in the Indian blogosphere, its seems that a lot of criticism of her personality originates in the right wing a.k.a Hindutatva blogs(and their comment sections) and most of the times degenerates to a very personal level. The reason for this is a bit complicated and has more to do with her association with NDTV than anything else.

    Also if the aforementioned blogger was so confident about the accuracy of his claims, I don't know why he didn't stood up for it. This is India not US, civil cases can be fought in India without much expense and from the “support” he seems to have I think he could have start a support campaign also.

  355. pkr says:

    Lets not get ahead of ourselves here, most of the blogging in India is not original, even during the Mumbai attacks the bloggers “covering” the event were only posting links to various newspapers and other news websites only, so no, don't claim that you are the voice of people or something grand like that.

    Coming back to Ms Dutt and her critics in the Indian blogosphere, its seems that a lot of criticism of her personality originates in the right wing a.k.a Hindutatva blogs(and their comment sections) and most of the times degenerates to a very personal level. The reason for this is a bit complicated and has more to do with her association with NDTV than anything else.

    Also if the aforementioned blogger was so confident about the accuracy of his claims, I don't know why he didn't stood up for it. This is India not US, civil cases can be fought in India without much expense and from the “support” he seems to have I think he could have start a support campaign also.

  356. pkr says:

    Lets not get ahead of ourselves here, most of the blogging in India is not original, even during the Mumbai attacks the bloggers “covering” the event were only posting links to various newspapers and other news websites only, so no, don't claim that you are the voice of people or something grand like that.

    Coming back to Ms Dutt and her critics in the Indian blogosphere, its seems that a lot of criticism of her personality originates in the right wing a.k.a Hindutatva blogs(and their comment sections) and most of the times degenerates to a very personal level. The reason for this is a bit complicated and has more to do with her association with NDTV than anything else.

    Also if the aforementioned blogger was so confident about the accuracy of his claims, I don't know why he didn't stood up for it. This is India not US, civil cases can be fought in India without much expense and from the “support” he seems to have I think he could have start a support campaign also.

  357. pkr says:

    Lets not get ahead of ourselves here, most of the blogging in India is not original, even during the Mumbai attacks the bloggers “covering” the event were only posting links to various newspapers and other news websites only, so no, don't claim that you are the voice of people or something grand like that.

    Coming back to Ms Dutt and her critics in the Indian blogosphere, its seems that a lot of criticism of her personality originates in the right wing a.k.a Hindutatva blogs(and their comment sections) and most of the times degenerates to a very personal level. The reason for this is a bit complicated and has more to do with her association with NDTV than anything else.

    Also if the aforementioned blogger was so confident about the accuracy of his claims, I don't know why he didn't stood up for it. This is India not US, civil cases can be fought in India without much expense and from the “support” he seems to have I think he could have start a support campaign also.

  358. nandini d says:

    Totally agree with Harshad Joshi. Lets get back to good ol' DD. Unlike the private news channels that only sensationalise news to help their ratings, DD actually is the peoples news channel.
    I think 'We the Peoplle' ( Pun totally intended) should try asking our govt to put more funds into raising the standard of the DD telecasts and help get them advertisment time on air so that they can also compete with the stupid private channels.

    C'mon how many people actually believe these private channels gives a damn. The journalist working for them enjoy a celebrity status. Both live for their ratings. Even the normal soap channels are far better than them. Atleast they dont hound people or ask stupid questions.

  359. nandini d says:

    Totally agree with Harshad Joshi. Lets get back to good ol' DD. Unlike the private news channels that only sensationalise news to help their ratings, DD actually is the peoples news channel.
    I think 'We the Peoplle' ( Pun totally intended) should try asking our govt to put more funds into raising the standard of the DD telecasts and help get them advertisment time on air so that they can also compete with the stupid private channels.

    C'mon how many people actually believe these private channels gives a damn. The journalist working for them enjoy a celebrity status. Both live for their ratings. Even the normal soap channels are far better than them. Atleast they dont hound people or ask stupid questions.

  360. nandini d says:

    Totally agree with Harshad Joshi. Lets get back to good ol' DD. Unlike the private news channels that only sensationalise news to help their ratings, DD actually is the peoples news channel.
    I think 'We the Peoplle' ( Pun totally intended) should try asking our govt to put more funds into raising the standard of the DD telecasts and help get them advertisment time on air so that they can also compete with the stupid private channels.

    C'mon how many people actually believe these private channels gives a damn. The journalist working for them enjoy a celebrity status. Both live for their ratings. Even the normal soap channels are far better than them. Atleast they dont hound people or ask stupid questions.

  361. nandini d says:

    Totally agree with Harshad Joshi. Lets get back to good ol' DD. Unlike the private news channels that only sensationalise news to help their ratings, DD actually is the peoples news channel.
    I think 'We the Peoplle' ( Pun totally intended) should try asking our govt to put more funds into raising the standard of the DD telecasts and help get them advertisment time on air so that they can also compete with the stupid private channels.

    C'mon how many people actually believe these private channels gives a damn. The journalist working for them enjoy a celebrity status. Both live for their ratings. Even the normal soap channels are far better than them. Atleast they dont hound people or ask stupid questions.

  362. nandini d says:

    Totally agree with Harshad Joshi. Lets get back to good ol' DD. Unlike the private news channels that only sensationalise news to help their ratings, DD actually is the peoples news channel.
    I think 'We the Peoplle' ( Pun totally intended) should try asking our govt to put more funds into raising the standard of the DD telecasts and help get them advertisment time on air so that they can also compete with the stupid private channels.

    C'mon how many people actually believe these private channels gives a damn. The journalist working for them enjoy a celebrity status. Both live for their ratings. Even the normal soap channels are far better than them. Atleast they dont hound people or ask stupid questions.

  363. nandini d says:

    Totally agree with Harshad Joshi. Lets get back to good ol' DD. Unlike the private news channels that only sensationalise news to help their ratings, DD actually is the peoples news channel.
    I think 'We the Peoplle' ( Pun totally intended) should try asking our govt to put more funds into raising the standard of the DD telecasts and help get them advertisment time on air so that they can also compete with the stupid private channels.

    C'mon how many people actually believe these private channels gives a damn. The journalist working for them enjoy a celebrity status. Both live for their ratings. Even the normal soap channels are far better than them. Atleast they dont hound people or ask stupid questions.

  364. nandini d says:

    Totally agree with Harshad Joshi. Lets get back to good ol' DD. Unlike the private news channels that only sensationalise news to help their ratings, DD actually is the peoples news channel.
    I think 'We the Peoplle' ( Pun totally intended) should try asking our govt to put more funds into raising the standard of the DD telecasts and help get them advertisment time on air so that they can also compete with the stupid private channels.

    C'mon how many people actually believe these private channels gives a damn. The journalist working for them enjoy a celebrity status. Both live for their ratings. Even the normal soap channels are far better than them. Atleast they dont hound people or ask stupid questions.

  365. nandini d says:

    Totally agree with Harshad Joshi. Lets get back to good ol' DD. Unlike the private news channels that only sensationalise news to help their ratings, DD actually is the peoples news channel.
    I think 'We the Peoplle' ( Pun totally intended) should try asking our govt to put more funds into raising the standard of the DD telecasts and help get them advertisment time on air so that they can also compete with the stupid private channels.

    C'mon how many people actually believe these private channels gives a damn. The journalist working for them enjoy a celebrity status. Both live for their ratings. Even the normal soap channels are far better than them. Atleast they dont hound people or ask stupid questions.

  366. nandini d says:

    Totally agree with Harshad Joshi. Lets get back to good ol' DD. Unlike the private news channels that only sensationalise news to help their ratings, DD actually is the peoples news channel.
    I think 'We the Peoplle' ( Pun totally intended) should try asking our govt to put more funds into raising the standard of the DD telecasts and help get them advertisment time on air so that they can also compete with the stupid private channels.

    C'mon how many people actually believe these private channels gives a damn. The journalist working for them enjoy a celebrity status. Both live for their ratings. Even the normal soap channels are far better than them. Atleast they dont hound people or ask stupid questions.

  367. nandini d says:

    Totally agree with Harshad Joshi. Lets get back to good ol' DD. Unlike the private news channels that only sensationalise news to help their ratings, DD actually is the peoples news channel.
    I think 'We the Peoplle' ( Pun totally intended) should try asking our govt to put more funds into raising the standard of the DD telecasts and help get them advertisment time on air so that they can also compete with the stupid private channels.

    C'mon how many people actually believe these private channels gives a damn. The journalist working for them enjoy a celebrity status. Both live for their ratings. Even the normal soap channels are far better than them. Atleast they dont hound people or ask stupid questions.

  368. Pradeep says:

    I don't know who gave this advice of taking legal action against a blogger to Barkha, she has shot herself in the foot by acting on this stupid advice. I don't know how many people had actually read Chyetanya's blog, by forcing him to withdraw his post she has made sure every one in the world knows about it. I made sure to forward the link to this post to atleast hundred people and shared all related articles on google reader and talked about it to some 10 people today. My action today would result in atleast a 1000 people laughing at her when she will try to present a serious story on NDTV next time. Within next one week whole of India will be laughing at her :-). Oh Barkha, now please don't write another article justifying what you did then the whole world will laugh at you.

  369. Pradeep says:

    I don't know who gave this advice of taking legal action against a blogger to Barkha, she has shot herself in the foot by acting on this stupid advice. I don't know how many people had actually read Chyetanya's blog, by forcing him to withdraw his post she has made sure every one in the world knows about it. I made sure to forward the link to this post to atleast hundred people and shared all related articles on google reader and talked about it to some 10 people today. My action today would result in atleast a 1000 people laughing at her when she will try to present a serious story on NDTV next time. Within next one week whole of India will be laughing at her :-). Oh Barkha, now please don't write another article justifying what you did then the whole world will laugh at you.

  370. Pradeep says:

    I don't know who gave this advice of taking legal action against a blogger to Barkha, she has shot herself in the foot by acting on this stupid advice. I don't know how many people had actually read Chyetanya's blog, by forcing him to withdraw his post she has made sure every one in the world knows about it. I made sure to forward the link to this post to atleast hundred people and shared all related articles on google reader and talked about it to some 10 people today. My action today would result in atleast a 1000 people laughing at her when she will try to present a serious story on NDTV next time. Within next one week whole of India will be laughing at her :-). Oh Barkha, now please don't write another article justifying what you did then the whole world will laugh at you.

  371. Pradeep says:

    I don't know who gave this advice of taking legal action against a blogger to Barkha, she has shot herself in the foot by acting on this stupid advice. I don't know how many people had actually read Chyetanya's blog, by forcing him to withdraw his post she has made sure every one in the world knows about it. I made sure to forward the link to this post to atleast hundred people and shared all related articles on google reader and talked about it to some 10 people today. My action today would result in atleast a 1000 people laughing at her when she will try to present a serious story on NDTV next time. Within next one week whole of India will be laughing at her :-). Oh Barkha, now please don't write another article justifying what you did then the whole world will laugh at you.

  372. Pradeep says:

    I don't know who gave this advice of taking legal action against a blogger to Barkha, she has shot herself in the foot by acting on this stupid advice. I don't know how many people had actually read Chyetanya's blog, by forcing him to withdraw his post she has made sure every one in the world knows about it. I made sure to forward the link to this post to atleast hundred people and shared all related articles on google reader and talked about it to some 10 people today. My action today would result in atleast a 1000 people laughing at her when she will try to present a serious story on NDTV next time. Within next one week whole of India will be laughing at her :-). Oh Barkha, now please don't write another article justifying what you did then the whole world will laugh at you.

  373. Pradeep says:

    I don't know who gave this advice of taking legal action against a blogger to Barkha, she has shot herself in the foot by acting on this stupid advice. I don't know how many people had actually read Chyetanya's blog, by forcing him to withdraw his post she has made sure every one in the world knows about it. I made sure to forward the link to this post to atleast hundred people and shared all related articles on google reader and talked about it to some 10 people today. My action today would result in atleast a 1000 people laughing at her when she will try to present a serious story on NDTV next time. Within next one week whole of India will be laughing at her :-). Oh Barkha, now please don't write another article justifying what you did then the whole world will laugh at you.

  374. Pradeep says:

    I don't know who gave this advice of taking legal action against a blogger to Barkha, she has shot herself in the foot by acting on this stupid advice. I don't know how many people had actually read Chyetanya's blog, by forcing him to withdraw his post she has made sure every one in the world knows about it. I made sure to forward the link to this post to atleast hundred people and shared all related articles on google reader and talked about it to some 10 people today. My action today would result in atleast a 1000 people laughing at her when she will try to present a serious story on NDTV next time. Within next one week whole of India will be laughing at her :-). Oh Barkha, now please don't write another article justifying what you did then the whole world will laugh at you.

  375. Pradeep says:

    I don't know who gave this advice of taking legal action against a blogger to Barkha, she has shot herself in the foot by acting on this stupid advice. I don't know how many people had actually read Chyetanya's blog, by forcing him to withdraw his post she has made sure every one in the world knows about it. I made sure to forward the link to this post to atleast hundred people and shared all related articles on google reader and talked about it to some 10 people today. My action today would result in atleast a 1000 people laughing at her when she will try to present a serious story on NDTV next time. Within next one week whole of India will be laughing at her :-). Oh Barkha, now please don't write another article justifying what you did then the whole world will laugh at you.

  376. Pradeep says:

    I don't know who gave this advice of taking legal action against a blogger to Barkha, she has shot herself in the foot by acting on this stupid advice. I don't know how many people had actually read Chyetanya's blog, by forcing him to withdraw his post she has made sure every one in the world knows about it. I made sure to forward the link to this post to atleast hundred people and shared all related articles on google reader and talked about it to some 10 people today. My action today would result in atleast a 1000 people laughing at her when she will try to present a serious story on NDTV next time. Within next one week whole of India will be laughing at her :-). Oh Barkha, now please don't write another article justifying what you did then the whole world will laugh at you.

  377. Pradeep says:

    I don't know who gave this advice of taking legal action against a blogger to Barkha, she has shot herself in the foot by acting on this stupid advice. I don't know how many people had actually read Chyetanya's blog, by forcing him to withdraw his post she has made sure every one in the world knows about it. I made sure to forward the link to this post to atleast hundred people and shared all related articles on google reader and talked about it to some 10 people today. My action today would result in atleast a 1000 people laughing at her when she will try to present a serious story on NDTV next time. Within next one week whole of India will be laughing at her :-). Oh Barkha, now please don't write another article justifying what you did then the whole world will laugh at you.

  378. Anon says:

    Ah come on, Your own blog has words like maniac and idiot thrown in…lets assume a Hindu right-wing organization sues you for it…I am sure you and your likes will be making a hell of a noise about it and unlike in this case the media will take cudgels on your behalf.

  379. Anon says:

    Ah come on, Your own blog has words like maniac and idiot thrown in…lets assume a Hindu right-wing organization sues you for it…I am sure you and your likes will be making a hell of a noise about it and unlike in this case the media will take cudgels on your behalf.

  380. Anon says:

    Ah come on, Your own blog has words like maniac and idiot thrown in…lets assume a Hindu right-wing organization sues you for it…I am sure you and your likes will be making a hell of a noise about it and unlike in this case the media will take cudgels on your behalf.

  381. Anon says:

    Ah come on, Your own blog has words like maniac and idiot thrown in…lets assume a Hindu right-wing organization sues you for it…I am sure you and your likes will be making a hell of a noise about it and unlike in this case the media will take cudgels on your behalf.

  382. Anon says:

    Ah come on, Your own blog has words like maniac and idiot thrown in…lets assume a Hindu right-wing organization sues you for it…I am sure you and your likes will be making a hell of a noise about it and unlike in this case the media will take cudgels on your behalf.

  383. Anon says:

    Ah come on, Your own blog has words like maniac and idiot thrown in…lets assume a Hindu right-wing organization sues you for it…I am sure you and your likes will be making a hell of a noise about it and unlike in this case the media will take cudgels on your behalf.

  384. Anon says:

    Ah come on, Your own blog has words like maniac and idiot thrown in…lets assume a Hindu right-wing organization sues you for it…I am sure you and your likes will be making a hell of a noise about it and unlike in this case the media will take cudgels on your behalf.

  385. Anon says:

    Ah come on, Your own blog has words like maniac and idiot thrown in…lets assume a Hindu right-wing organization sues you for it…I am sure you and your likes will be making a hell of a noise about it and unlike in this case the media will take cudgels on your behalf.

  386. Anon says:

    Ah come on, Your own blog has words like maniac and idiot thrown in…lets assume a Hindu right-wing organization sues you for it…I am sure you and your likes will be making a hell of a noise about it and unlike in this case the media will take cudgels on your behalf.

  387. Anon says:

    Ah come on, Your own blog has words like maniac and idiot thrown in…lets assume a Hindu right-wing organization sues you for it…I am sure you and your likes will be making a hell of a noise about it and unlike in this case the media will take cudgels on your behalf.

  388. jugggernaut says:

    Barkha sucks!
    I have condemned this act of hers, too.

    All bloggers should unite and de-throne this pseudo-secular, self-righteous, pompous female!

  389. jugggernaut says:

    Barkha sucks!
    I have condemned this act of hers, too.

    All bloggers should unite and de-throne this pseudo-secular, self-righteous, pompous female!

  390. jugggernaut says:

    Barkha sucks!
    I have condemned this act of hers, too.

    All bloggers should unite and de-throne this pseudo-secular, self-righteous, pompous female!

  391. jugggernaut says:

    Barkha sucks!
    I have condemned this act of hers, too.

    All bloggers should unite and de-throne this pseudo-secular, self-righteous, pompous female!

  392. jugggernaut says:

    Barkha sucks!
    I have condemned this act of hers, too.

    All bloggers should unite and de-throne this pseudo-secular, self-righteous, pompous female!

  393. jugggernaut says:

    Barkha sucks!
    I have condemned this act of hers, too.

    All bloggers should unite and de-throne this pseudo-secular, self-righteous, pompous female!

  394. jugggernaut says:

    Barkha sucks!
    I have condemned this act of hers, too.

    All bloggers should unite and de-throne this pseudo-secular, self-righteous, pompous female!

  395. jugggernaut says:

    Barkha sucks!
    I have condemned this act of hers, too.

    All bloggers should unite and de-throne this pseudo-secular, self-righteous, pompous female!

  396. jugggernaut says:

    Barkha sucks!
    I have condemned this act of hers, too.

    All bloggers should unite and de-throne this pseudo-secular, self-righteous, pompous female!

  397. jugggernaut says:

    Barkha sucks!
    I have condemned this act of hers, too.

    All bloggers should unite and de-throne this pseudo-secular, self-righteous, pompous female!

  398. bonobashi says:

    Right, let's not get ahead of ourselves.

    1. This is not about blogging being original; nobody as far as I can see is pushing blogging as the next live medium. Blogging is essentially derivative; it talks, for instance, about journalism and the media in terms of the perception of the blogger. What Kunte wrote was perfectly in order.

    2. Nobody needs to claim that blogging is the voice of the people. It is a fact, isn't it, unless it is being proposed that bloggers are not people? Yes, it's a quibble; most of the original comment was a quibble, wasn't it?

    Perhaps it would help if the phrase in question were to be read more accurately as “blogging is the voice of people”. Thereafter it is a metaphysical debate as to when the voice of people turns into the voice of the people.

    It does not help to pick up one voice out of the crowd and tear it apart, and generalise from that isolated example. That applies whether one is looking at one or more than one; the point is that nobody can pretend to speak for bloggers as a whole. Bloggers do not exist in a community that has an authorised spokesperson; it's each blogger for himself or herself.

    3. I am aware that much criticism of NDTV (also Prannoy Roy) comes from the religious right-wing. Actually, from what I've seen, it's one site, whose personal and ad hominem bilge has been repeated, ad nauseam if you like, by others, in fairly representative Hindutva style. The burden of the sniping, ignoring their comments section for the moment (who reads comments, anyway?), is about Prannoy's parentage, about his political affiliations as discovered through tracing his wife's antecedents, and his relationship with a Christian commentator and woman of letters. It is totally a farrago of nonsense, and conflates Communist and Christian leanings. Only a certain type of stereotypical hate-fan would take it seriously.

    That has nothing to do with present criticism. I watched TV fairly exhaustively during that period, and naturally my first inclination was to watch NDTV, which I had grown to trust over the years. What I saw was horrifying.

    I do not yield to anyone in terms of secular conviction or in terms of social orientation, in the political sense. The criticism is not about politics; it's about bad journalism, about bad journalistic practice.

    4. About the ease with which an individual blogger can evade the unwelcome attentions of a large corporation out to nail the blogger, the kindest way to respond is to suggest that perhaps the subject should be revisited after speaking to a lawyer friend.

    The respondent needs to respond to charges and a summons, needs to be represented by counsel, needs to be able to pay the high fees, and needs to be able to identify the right legal representative at a location not necessarily of that respondent's choice. I think it was flip and superficial to dismiss the daunting nature of the situation with a few glib phrases.

  399. bonobashi says:

    Right, let's not get ahead of ourselves.

    1. This is not about blogging being original; nobody as far as I can see is pushing blogging as the next live medium. Blogging is essentially derivative; it talks, for instance, about journalism and the media in terms of the perception of the blogger. What Kunte wrote was perfectly in order.

    2. Nobody needs to claim that blogging is the voice of the people. It is a fact, isn't it, unless it is being proposed that bloggers are not people? Yes, it's a quibble; most of the original comment was a quibble, wasn't it?

    Perhaps it would help if the phrase in question were to be read more accurately as “blogging is the voice of people”. Thereafter it is a metaphysical debate as to when the voice of people turns into the voice of the people.

    It does not help to pick up one voice out of the crowd and tear it apart, and generalise from that isolated example. That applies whether one is looking at one or more than one; the point is that nobody can pretend to speak for bloggers as a whole. Bloggers do not exist in a community that has an authorised spokesperson; it's each blogger for himself or herself.

    3. I am aware that much criticism of NDTV (also Prannoy Roy) comes from the religious right-wing. Actually, from what I've seen, it's one site, whose personal and ad hominem bilge has been repeated, ad nauseam if you like, by others, in fairly representative Hindutva style. The burden of the sniping, ignoring their comments section for the moment (who reads comments, anyway?), is about Prannoy's parentage, about his political affiliations as discovered through tracing his wife's antecedents, and his relationship with a Christian commentator and woman of letters. It is totally a farrago of nonsense, and conflates Communist and Christian leanings. Only a certain type of stereotypical hate-fan would take it seriously.

    That has nothing to do with present criticism. I watched TV fairly exhaustively during that period, and naturally my first inclination was to watch NDTV, which I had grown to trust over the years. What I saw was horrifying.

    I do not yield to anyone in terms of secular conviction or in terms of social orientation, in the political sense. The criticism is not about politics; it's about bad journalism, about bad journalistic practice.

    4. About the ease with which an individual blogger can evade the unwelcome attentions of a large corporation out to nail the blogger, the kindest way to respond is to suggest that perhaps the subject should be revisited after speaking to a lawyer friend.

    The respondent needs to respond to charges and a summons, needs to be represented by counsel, needs to be able to pay the high fees, and needs to be able to identify the right legal representative at a location not necessarily of that respondent's choice. I think it was flip and superficial to dismiss the daunting nature of the situation with a few glib phrases.

  400. bonobashi says:

    Right, let's not get ahead of ourselves.

    1. This is not about blogging being original; nobody as far as I can see is pushing blogging as the next live medium. Blogging is essentially derivative; it talks, for instance, about journalism and the media in terms of the perception of the blogger. What Kunte wrote was perfectly in order.

    2. Nobody needs to claim that blogging is the voice of the people. It is a fact, isn't it, unless it is being proposed that bloggers are not people? Yes, it's a quibble; most of the original comment was a quibble, wasn't it?

    Perhaps it would help if the phrase in question were to be read more accurately as “blogging is the voice of people”. Thereafter it is a metaphysical debate as to when the voice of people turns into the voice of the people.

    It does not help to pick up one voice out of the crowd and tear it apart, and generalise from that isolated example. That applies whether one is looking at one or more than one; the point is that nobody can pretend to speak for bloggers as a whole. Bloggers do not exist in a community that has an authorised spokesperson; it's each blogger for himself or herself.

    3. I am aware that much criticism of NDTV (also Prannoy Roy) comes from the religious right-wing. Actually, from what I've seen, it's one site, whose personal and ad hominem bilge has been repeated, ad nauseam if you like, by others, in fairly representative Hindutva style. The burden of the sniping, ignoring their comments section for the moment (who reads comments, anyway?), is about Prannoy's parentage, about his political affiliations as discovered through tracing his wife's antecedents, and his relationship with a Christian commentator and woman of letters. It is totally a farrago of nonsense, and conflates Communist and Christian leanings. Only a certain type of stereotypical hate-fan would take it seriously.

    That has nothing to do with present criticism. I watched TV fairly exhaustively during that period, and naturally my first inclination was to watch NDTV, which I had grown to trust over the years. What I saw was horrifying.

    I do not yield to anyone in terms of secular conviction or in terms of social orientation, in the political sense. The criticism is not about politics; it's about bad journalism, about bad journalistic practice.

    4. About the ease with which an individual blogger can evade the unwelcome attentions of a large corporation out to nail the blogger, the kindest way to respond is to suggest that perhaps the subject should be revisited after speaking to a lawyer friend.

    The respondent needs to respond to charges and a summons, needs to be represented by counsel, needs to be able to pay the high fees, and needs to be able to identify the right legal representative at a location not necessarily of that respondent's choice. I think it was flip and superficial to dismiss the daunting nature of the situation with a few glib phrases.

  401. bonobashi says:

    Right, let's not get ahead of ourselves.

    1. This is not about blogging being original; nobody as far as I can see is pushing blogging as the next live medium. Blogging is essentially derivative; it talks, for instance, about journalism and the media in terms of the perception of the blogger. What Kunte wrote was perfectly in order.

    2. Nobody needs to claim that blogging is the voice of the people. It is a fact, isn't it, unless it is being proposed that bloggers are not people? Yes, it's a quibble; most of the original comment was a quibble, wasn't it?

    Perhaps it would help if the phrase in question were to be read more accurately as “blogging is the voice of people”. Thereafter it is a metaphysical debate as to when the voice of people turns into the voice of the people.

    It does not help to pick up one voice out of the crowd and tear it apart, and generalise from that isolated example. That applies whether one is looking at one or more than one; the point is that nobody can pretend to speak for bloggers as a whole. Bloggers do not exist in a community that has an authorised spokesperson; it's each blogger for himself or herself.

    3. I am aware that much criticism of NDTV (also Prannoy Roy) comes from the religious right-wing. Actually, from what I've seen, it's one site, whose personal and ad hominem bilge has been repeated, ad nauseam if you like, by others, in fairly representative Hindutva style. The burden of the sniping, ignoring their comments section for the moment (who reads comments, anyway?), is about Prannoy's parentage, about his political affiliations as discovered through tracing his wife's antecedents, and his relationship with a Christian commentator and woman of letters. It is totally a farrago of nonsense, and conflates Communist and Christian leanings. Only a certain type of stereotypical hate-fan would take it seriously.

    That has nothing to do with present criticism. I watched TV fairly exhaustively during that period, and naturally my first inclination was to watch NDTV, which I had grown to trust over the years. What I saw was horrifying.

    I do not yield to anyone in terms of secular conviction or in terms of social orientation, in the political sense. The criticism is not about politics; it's about bad journalism, about bad journalistic practice.

    4. About the ease with which an individual blogger can evade the unwelcome attentions of a large corporation out to nail the blogger, the kindest way to respond is to suggest that perhaps the subject should be revisited after speaking to a lawyer friend.

    The respondent needs to respond to charges and a summons, needs to be represented by counsel, needs to be able to pay the high fees, and needs to be able to identify the right legal representative at a location not necessarily of that respondent's choice. I think it was flip and superficial to dismiss the daunting nature of the situation with a few glib phrases.

  402. bonobashi says:

    Right, let's not get ahead of ourselves.

    1. This is not about blogging being original; nobody as far as I can see is pushing blogging as the next live medium. Blogging is essentially derivative; it talks, for instance, about journalism and the media in terms of the perception of the blogger. What Kunte wrote was perfectly in order.

    2. Nobody needs to claim that blogging is the voice of the people. It is a fact, isn't it, unless it is being proposed that bloggers are not people? Yes, it's a quibble; most of the original comment was a quibble, wasn't it?

    Perhaps it would help if the phrase in question were to be read more accurately as “blogging is the voice of people”. Thereafter it is a metaphysical debate as to when the voice of people turns into the voice of the people.

    It does not help to pick up one voice out of the crowd and tear it apart, and generalise from that isolated example. That applies whether one is looking at one or more than one; the point is that nobody can pretend to speak for bloggers as a whole. Bloggers do not exist in a community that has an authorised spokesperson; it's each blogger for himself or herself.

    3. I am aware that much criticism of NDTV (also Prannoy Roy) comes from the religious right-wing. Actually, from what I've seen, it's one site, whose personal and ad hominem bilge has been repeated, ad nauseam if you like, by others, in fairly representative Hindutva style. The burden of the sniping, ignoring their comments section for the moment (who reads comments, anyway?), is about Prannoy's parentage, about his political affiliations as discovered through tracing his wife's antecedents, and his relationship with a Christian commentator and woman of letters. It is totally a farrago of nonsense, and conflates Communist and Christian leanings. Only a certain type of stereotypical hate-fan would take it seriously.

    That has nothing to do with present criticism. I watched TV fairly exhaustively during that period, and naturally my first inclination was to watch NDTV, which I had grown to trust over the years. What I saw was horrifying.

    I do not yield to anyone in terms of secular conviction or in terms of social orientation, in the political sense. The criticism is not about politics; it's about bad journalism, about bad journalistic practice.

    4. About the ease with which an individual blogger can evade the unwelcome attentions of a large corporation out to nail the blogger, the kindest way to respond is to suggest that perhaps the subject should be revisited after speaking to a lawyer friend.

    The respondent needs to respond to charges and a summons, needs to be represented by counsel, needs to be able to pay the high fees, and needs to be able to identify the right legal representative at a location not necessarily of that respondent's choice. I think it was flip and superficial to dismiss the daunting nature of the situation with a few glib phrases.

  403. bonobashi says:

    Right, let's not get ahead of ourselves.

    1. This is not about blogging being original; nobody as far as I can see is pushing blogging as the next live medium. Blogging is essentially derivative; it talks, for instance, about journalism and the media in terms of the perception of the blogger. What Kunte wrote was perfectly in order.

    2. Nobody needs to claim that blogging is the voice of the people. It is a fact, isn't it, unless it is being proposed that bloggers are not people? Yes, it's a quibble; most of the original comment was a quibble, wasn't it?

    Perhaps it would help if the phrase in question were to be read more accurately as “blogging is the voice of people”. Thereafter it is a metaphysical debate as to when the voice of people turns into the voice of the people.

    It does not help to pick up one voice out of the crowd and tear it apart, and generalise from that isolated example. That applies whether one is looking at one or more than one; the point is that nobody can pretend to speak for bloggers as a whole. Bloggers do not exist in a community that has an authorised spokesperson; it's each blogger for himself or herself.

    3. I am aware that much criticism of NDTV (also Prannoy Roy) comes from the religious right-wing. Actually, from what I've seen, it's one site, whose personal and ad hominem bilge has been repeated, ad nauseam if you like, by others, in fairly representative Hindutva style. The burden of the sniping, ignoring their comments section for the moment (who reads comments, anyway?), is about Prannoy's parentage, about his political affiliations as discovered through tracing his wife's antecedents, and his relationship with a Christian commentator and woman of letters. It is totally a farrago of nonsense, and conflates Communist and Christian leanings. Only a certain type of stereotypical hate-fan would take it seriously.

    That has nothing to do with present criticism. I watched TV fairly exhaustively during that period, and naturally my first inclination was to watch NDTV, which I had grown to trust over the years. What I saw was horrifying.

    I do not yield to anyone in terms of secular conviction or in terms of social orientation, in the political sense. The criticism is not about politics; it's about bad journalism, about bad journalistic practice.

    4. About the ease with which an individual blogger can evade the unwelcome attentions of a large corporation out to nail the blogger, the kindest way to respond is to suggest that perhaps the subject should be revisited after speaking to a lawyer friend.

    The respondent needs to respond to charges and a summons, needs to be represented by counsel, needs to be able to pay the high fees, and needs to be able to identify the right legal representative at a location not necessarily of that respondent's choice. I think it was flip and superficial to dismiss the daunting nature of the situation with a few glib phrases.

  404. bonobashi says:

    Right, let's not get ahead of ourselves.

    1. This is not about blogging being original; nobody as far as I can see is pushing blogging as the next live medium. Blogging is essentially derivative; it talks, for instance, about journalism and the media in terms of the perception of the blogger. What Kunte wrote was perfectly in order.

    2. Nobody needs to claim that blogging is the voice of the people. It is a fact, isn't it, unless it is being proposed that bloggers are not people? Yes, it's a quibble; most of the original comment was a quibble, wasn't it?

    Perhaps it would help if the phrase in question were to be read more accurately as “blogging is the voice of people”. Thereafter it is a metaphysical debate as to when the voice of people turns into the voice of the people.

    It does not help to pick up one voice out of the crowd and tear it apart, and generalise from that isolated example. That applies whether one is looking at one or more than one; the point is that nobody can pretend to speak for bloggers as a whole. Bloggers do not exist in a community that has an authorised spokesperson; it's each blogger for himself or herself.

    3. I am aware that much criticism of NDTV (also Prannoy Roy) comes from the religious right-wing. Actually, from what I've seen, it's one site, whose personal and ad hominem bilge has been repeated, ad nauseam if you like, by others, in fairly representative Hindutva style. The burden of the sniping, ignoring their comments section for the moment (who reads comments, anyway?), is about Prannoy's parentage, about his political affiliations as discovered through tracing his wife's antecedents, and his relationship with a Christian commentator and woman of letters. It is totally a farrago of nonsense, and conflates Communist and Christian leanings. Only a certain type of stereotypical hate-fan would take it seriously.

    That has nothing to do with present criticism. I watched TV fairly exhaustively during that period, and naturally my first inclination was to watch NDTV, which I had grown to trust over the years. What I saw was horrifying.

    I do not yield to anyone in terms of secular conviction or in terms of social orientation, in the political sense. The criticism is not about politics; it's about bad journalism, about bad journalistic practice.

    4. About the ease with which an individual blogger can evade the unwelcome attentions of a large corporation out to nail the blogger, the kindest way to respond is to suggest that perhaps the subject should be revisited after speaking to a lawyer friend.

    The respondent needs to respond to charges and a summons, needs to be represented by counsel, needs to be able to pay the high fees, and needs to be able to identify the right legal representative at a location not necessarily of that respondent's choice. I think it was flip and superficial to dismiss the daunting nature of the situation with a few glib phrases.

  405. bonobashi says:

    Right, let's not get ahead of ourselves.

    1. This is not about blogging being original; nobody as far as I can see is pushing blogging as the next live medium. Blogging is essentially derivative; it talks, for instance, about journalism and the media in terms of the perception of the blogger. What Kunte wrote was perfectly in order.

    2. Nobody needs to claim that blogging is the voice of the people. It is a fact, isn't it, unless it is being proposed that bloggers are not people? Yes, it's a quibble; most of the original comment was a quibble, wasn't it?

    Perhaps it would help if the phrase in question were to be read more accurately as “blogging is the voice of people”. Thereafter it is a metaphysical debate as to when the voice of people turns into the voice of the people.

    It does not help to pick up one voice out of the crowd and tear it apart, and generalise from that isolated example. That applies whether one is looking at one or more than one; the point is that nobody can pretend to speak for bloggers as a whole. Bloggers do not exist in a community that has an authorised spokesperson; it's each blogger for himself or herself.

    3. I am aware that much criticism of NDTV (also Prannoy Roy) comes from the religious right-wing. Actually, from what I've seen, it's one site, whose personal and ad hominem bilge has been repeated, ad nauseam if you like, by others, in fairly representative Hindutva style. The burden of the sniping, ignoring their comments section for the moment (who reads comments, anyway?), is about Prannoy's parentage, about his political affiliations as discovered through tracing his wife's antecedents, and his relationship with a Christian commentator and woman of letters. It is totally a farrago of nonsense, and conflates Communist and Christian leanings. Only a certain type of stereotypical hate-fan would take it seriously.

    That has nothing to do with present criticism. I watched TV fairly exhaustively during that period, and naturally my first inclination was to watch NDTV, which I had grown to trust over the years. What I saw was horrifying.

    I do not yield to anyone in terms of secular conviction or in terms of social orientation, in the political sense. The criticism is not about politics; it's about bad journalism, about bad journalistic practice.

    4. About the ease with which an individual blogger can evade the unwelcome attentions of a large corporation out to nail the blogger, the kindest way to respond is to suggest that perhaps the subject should be revisited after speaking to a lawyer friend.

    The respondent needs to respond to charges and a summons, needs to be represented by counsel, needs to be able to pay the high fees, and needs to be able to identify the right legal representative at a location not necessarily of that respondent's choice. I think it was flip and superficial to dismiss the daunting nature of the situation with a few glib phrases.

  406. bonobashi says:

    Right, let's not get ahead of ourselves.

    1. This is not about blogging being original; nobody as far as I can see is pushing blogging as the next live medium. Blogging is essentially derivative; it talks, for instance, about journalism and the media in terms of the perception of the blogger. What Kunte wrote was perfectly in order.

    2. Nobody needs to claim that blogging is the voice of the people. It is a fact, isn't it, unless it is being proposed that bloggers are not people? Yes, it's a quibble; most of the original comment was a quibble, wasn't it?

    Perhaps it would help if the phrase in question were to be read more accurately as “blogging is the voice of people”. Thereafter it is a metaphysical debate as to when the voice of people turns into the voice of the people.

    It does not help to pick up one voice out of the crowd and tear it apart, and generalise from that isolated example. That applies whether one is looking at one or more than one; the point is that nobody can pretend to speak for bloggers as a whole. Bloggers do not exist in a community that has an authorised spokesperson; it's each blogger for himself or herself.

    3. I am aware that much criticism of NDTV (also Prannoy Roy) comes from the religious right-wing. Actually, from what I've seen, it's one site, whose personal and ad hominem bilge has been repeated, ad nauseam if you like, by others, in fairly representative Hindutva style. The burden of the sniping, ignoring their comments section for the moment (who reads comments, anyway?), is about Prannoy's parentage, about his political affiliations as discovered through tracing his wife's antecedents, and his relationship with a Christian commentator and woman of letters. It is totally a farrago of nonsense, and conflates Communist and Christian leanings. Only a certain type of stereotypical hate-fan would take it seriously.

    That has nothing to do with present criticism. I watched TV fairly exhaustively during that period, and naturally my first inclination was to watch NDTV, which I had grown to trust over the years. What I saw was horrifying.

    I do not yield to anyone in terms of secular conviction or in terms of social orientation, in the political sense. The criticism is not about politics; it's about bad journalism, about bad journalistic practice.

    4. About the ease with which an individual blogger can evade the unwelcome attentions of a large corporation out to nail the blogger, the kindest way to respond is to suggest that perhaps the subject should be revisited after speaking to a lawyer friend.

    The respondent needs to respond to charges and a summons, needs to be represented by counsel, needs to be able to pay the high fees, and needs to be able to identify the right legal representative at a location not necessarily of that respondent's choice. I think it was flip and superficial to dismiss the daunting nature of the situation with a few glib phrases.

  407. bonobashi says:

    Right, let's not get ahead of ourselves.

    1. This is not about blogging being original; nobody as far as I can see is pushing blogging as the next live medium. Blogging is essentially derivative; it talks, for instance, about journalism and the media in terms of the perception of the blogger. What Kunte wrote was perfectly in order.

    2. Nobody needs to claim that blogging is the voice of the people. It is a fact, isn't it, unless it is being proposed that bloggers are not people? Yes, it's a quibble; most of the original comment was a quibble, wasn't it?

    Perhaps it would help if the phrase in question were to be read more accurately as “blogging is the voice of people”. Thereafter it is a metaphysical debate as to when the voice of people turns into the voice of the people.

    It does not help to pick up one voice out of the crowd and tear it apart, and generalise from that isolated example. That applies whether one is looking at one or more than one; the point is that nobody can pretend to speak for bloggers as a whole. Bloggers do not exist in a community that has an authorised spokesperson; it's each blogger for himself or herself.

    3. I am aware that much criticism of NDTV (also Prannoy Roy) comes from the religious right-wing. Actually, from what I've seen, it's one site, whose personal and ad hominem bilge has been repeated, ad nauseam if you like, by others, in fairly representative Hindutva style. The burden of the sniping, ignoring their comments section for the moment (who reads comments, anyway?), is about Prannoy's parentage, about his political affiliations as discovered through tracing his wife's antecedents, and his relationship with a Christian commentator and woman of letters. It is totally a farrago of nonsense, and conflates Communist and Christian leanings. Only a certain type of stereotypical hate-fan would take it seriously.

    That has nothing to do with present criticism. I watched TV fairly exhaustively during that period, and naturally my first inclination was to watch NDTV, which I had grown to trust over the years. What I saw was horrifying.

    I do not yield to anyone in terms of secular conviction or in terms of social orientation, in the political sense. The criticism is not about politics; it's about bad journalism, about bad journalistic practice.

    4. About the ease with which an individual blogger can evade the unwelcome attentions of a large corporation out to nail the blogger, the kindest way to respond is to suggest that perhaps the subject should be revisited after speaking to a lawyer friend.

    The respondent needs to respond to charges and a summons, needs to be represented by counsel, needs to be able to pay the high fees, and needs to be able to identify the right legal representative at a location not necessarily of that respondent's choice. I think it was flip and superficial to dismiss the daunting nature of the situation with a few glib phrases.

  408. KiranP says:

    Added in section called “Journalist aiding Terror”

    http://victimofprejudice.blogspot.com/

  409. KiranP says:

    Added in section called “Journalist aiding Terror”

    http://victimofprejudice.blogspot.com/

  410. KiranP says:

    Added in section called “Journalist aiding Terror”

    http://victimofprejudice.blogspot.com/

  411. KiranP says:

    Added in section called “Journalist aiding Terror”

    http://victimofprejudice.blogspot.com/

  412. KiranP says:

    Added in section called “Journalist aiding Terror”

    http://victimofprejudice.blogspot.com/

  413. KiranP says:

    Added in section called “Journalist aiding Terror”

    http://victimofprejudice.blogspot.com/

  414. KiranP says:

    Added in section called “Journalist aiding Terror”

    http://victimofprejudice.blogspot.com/

  415. KiranP says:

    Added in section called “Journalist aiding Terror”

    http://victimofprejudice.blogspot.com/

  416. KiranP says:

    Added in section called “Journalist aiding Terror”

    http://victimofprejudice.blogspot.com/

  417. KiranP says:

    Added in section called “Journalist aiding Terror”

    http://victimofprejudice.blogspot.com/

  418. KiranP says:

    Real Talibans of India – Media

    When a female journalist called Soumya Vishwanathan was killed in India’a national capital, the Chief Minister of Delhi Smt Sheila Dixit blamed the dead female journalist for her own tragedy by saying that she was too adventurous. The Media wholeheartedly supported Mrs Dixit and went gaga over her shortly afterwards, when she won the Delhi Assembly elections.

    When Scarlett Keeling was raped and killed in Goa and the needle of suspicion pointed to a strong nexus between the Goan Ministers, the drug mafia and the sex racketeers, the media played it very safe by conveniently choosing not to pursue the leads from the investigation.

    When a 14-year-old German girl was raped by Rohit Monserrate, the 21-year-old son of Goa Education Minister Atanasio Monserrate who is also a powerful political figure in Goa, and the girl’s mother was repeatedly harassed and their lawyer was grievously injured in order to coerce him to withdraw from the case, the Media didn’t find anything extraordinary in that.

    When Taslima Nasreen’s press conference was rudely disrupted and chairs and all sorts of dangerous objects were thrown at her in full glare of the cameras by the “secular” muslim jihadis of Hyderabad lead by the MLAs of Majlis Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM), the Media didnt at all find anything amiss in that.

    When Laxmi Oraon, an Adivasi woman was brutally thrashed and paraded naked through the streets of Guwahati, Assam, with the whole police paraphernalia and official state machinery in tow, the Media chose to downplay the episode since, the victim was a hapless adivasi woman from the lower strata of society.

    The Media felt that since all the above unsavoury incidents had occured in the states lead by Madam Sonia Antonia Maino’s puppets, it is all perfectly legitimate and absolutely secular and progressive.

    Kudos to the Media who are the Real Talibans of India.
    http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?Page

  419. KiranP says:

    Real Talibans of India – Media

    When a female journalist called Soumya Vishwanathan was killed in India’a national capital, the Chief Minister of Delhi Smt Sheila Dixit blamed the dead female journalist for her own tragedy by saying that she was too adventurous. The Media wholeheartedly supported Mrs Dixit and went gaga over her shortly afterwards, when she won the Delhi Assembly elections.

    When Scarlett Keeling was raped and killed in Goa and the needle of suspicion pointed to a strong nexus between the Goan Ministers, the drug mafia and the sex racketeers, the media played it very safe by conveniently choosing not to pursue the leads from the investigation.

    When a 14-year-old German girl was raped by Rohit Monserrate, the 21-year-old son of Goa Education Minister Atanasio Monserrate who is also a powerful political figure in Goa, and the girl’s mother was repeatedly harassed and their lawyer was grievously injured in order to coerce him to withdraw from the case, the Media didn’t find anything extraordinary in that.

    When Taslima Nasreen’s press conference was rudely disrupted and chairs and all sorts of dangerous objects were thrown at her in full glare of the cameras by the “secular” muslim jihadis of Hyderabad lead by the MLAs of Majlis Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM), the Media didnt at all find anything amiss in that.

    When Laxmi Oraon, an Adivasi woman was brutally thrashed and paraded naked through the streets of Guwahati, Assam, with the whole police paraphernalia and official state machinery in tow, the Media chose to downplay the episode since, the victim was a hapless adivasi woman from the lower strata of society.

    The Media felt that since all the above unsavoury incidents had occured in the states lead by Madam Sonia Antonia Maino’s puppets, it is all perfectly legitimate and absolutely secular and progressive.

    Kudos to the Media who are the Real Talibans of India.
    http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?Page

  420. KiranP says:

    Real Talibans of India – Media

    When a female journalist called Soumya Vishwanathan was killed in India’a national capital, the Chief Minister of Delhi Smt Sheila Dixit blamed the dead female journalist for her own tragedy by saying that she was too adventurous. The Media wholeheartedly supported Mrs Dixit and went gaga over her shortly afterwards, when she won the Delhi Assembly elections.

    When Scarlett Keeling was raped and killed in Goa and the needle of suspicion pointed to a strong nexus between the Goan Ministers, the drug mafia and the sex racketeers, the media played it very safe by conveniently choosing not to pursue the leads from the investigation.

    When a 14-year-old German girl was raped by Rohit Monserrate, the 21-year-old son of Goa Education Minister Atanasio Monserrate who is also a powerful political figure in Goa, and the girl’s mother was repeatedly harassed and their lawyer was grievously injured in order to coerce him to withdraw from the case, the Media didn’t find anything extraordinary in that.

    When Taslima Nasreen’s press conference was rudely disrupted and chairs and all sorts of dangerous objects were thrown at her in full glare of the cameras by the “secular” muslim jihadis of Hyderabad lead by the MLAs of Majlis Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM), the Media didnt at all find anything amiss in that.

    When Laxmi Oraon, an Adivasi woman was brutally thrashed and paraded naked through the streets of Guwahati, Assam, with the whole police paraphernalia and official state machinery in tow, the Media chose to downplay the episode since, the victim was a hapless adivasi woman from the lower strata of society.

    The Media felt that since all the above unsavoury incidents had occured in the states lead by Madam Sonia Antonia Maino’s puppets, it is all perfectly legitimate and absolutely secular and progressive.

    Kudos to the Media who are the Real Talibans of India.
    http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?Page

  421. KiranP says:

    Real Talibans of India – Media

    When a female journalist called Soumya Vishwanathan was killed in India’a national capital, the Chief Minister of Delhi Smt Sheila Dixit blamed the dead female journalist for her own tragedy by saying that she was too adventurous. The Media wholeheartedly supported Mrs Dixit and went gaga over her shortly afterwards, when she won the Delhi Assembly elections.

    When Scarlett Keeling was raped and killed in Goa and the needle of suspicion pointed to a strong nexus between the Goan Ministers, the drug mafia and the sex racketeers, the media played it very safe by conveniently choosing not to pursue the leads from the investigation.

    When a 14-year-old German girl was raped by Rohit Monserrate, the 21-year-old son of Goa Education Minister Atanasio Monserrate who is also a powerful political figure in Goa, and the girl’s mother was repeatedly harassed and their lawyer was grievously injured in order to coerce him to withdraw from the case, the Media didn’t find anything extraordinary in that.

    When Taslima Nasreen’s press conference was rudely disrupted and chairs and all sorts of dangerous objects were thrown at her in full glare of the cameras by the “secular” muslim jihadis of Hyderabad lead by the MLAs of Majlis Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM), the Media didnt at all find anything amiss in that.

    When Laxmi Oraon, an Adivasi woman was brutally thrashed and paraded naked through the streets of Guwahati, Assam, with the whole police paraphernalia and official state machinery in tow, the Media chose to downplay the episode since, the victim was a hapless adivasi woman from the lower strata of society.

    The Media felt that since all the above unsavoury incidents had occured in the states lead by Madam Sonia Antonia Maino’s puppets, it is all perfectly legitimate and absolutely secular and progressive.

    Kudos to the Media who are the Real Talibans of India.
    http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?Page

  422. KiranP says:

    Real Talibans of India – Media

    When a female journalist called Soumya Vishwanathan was killed in India’a national capital, the Chief Minister of Delhi Smt Sheila Dixit blamed the dead female journalist for her own tragedy by saying that she was too adventurous. The Media wholeheartedly supported Mrs Dixit and went gaga over her shortly afterwards, when she won the Delhi Assembly elections.

    When Scarlett Keeling was raped and killed in Goa and the needle of suspicion pointed to a strong nexus between the Goan Ministers, the drug mafia and the sex racketeers, the media played it very safe by conveniently choosing not to pursue the leads from the investigation.

    When a 14-year-old German girl was raped by Rohit Monserrate, the 21-year-old son of Goa Education Minister Atanasio Monserrate who is also a powerful political figure in Goa, and the girl’s mother was repeatedly harassed and their lawyer was grievously injured in order to coerce him to withdraw from the case, the Media didn’t find anything extraordinary in that.

    When Taslima Nasreen’s press conference was rudely disrupted and chairs and all sorts of dangerous objects were thrown at her in full glare of the cameras by the “secular” muslim jihadis of Hyderabad lead by the MLAs of Majlis Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM), the Media didnt at all find anything amiss in that.

    When Laxmi Oraon, an Adivasi woman was brutally thrashed and paraded naked through the streets of Guwahati, Assam, with the whole police paraphernalia and official state machinery in tow, the Media chose to downplay the episode since, the victim was a hapless adivasi woman from the lower strata of society.

    The Media felt that since all the above unsavoury incidents had occured in the states lead by Madam Sonia Antonia Maino’s puppets, it is all perfectly legitimate and absolutely secular and progressive.

    Kudos to the Media who are the Real Talibans of India.
    http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?Page

  423. KiranP says:

    Real Talibans of India – Media

    When a female journalist called Soumya Vishwanathan was killed in India’a national capital, the Chief Minister of Delhi Smt Sheila Dixit blamed the dead female journalist for her own tragedy by saying that she was too adventurous. The Media wholeheartedly supported Mrs Dixit and went gaga over her shortly afterwards, when she won the Delhi Assembly elections.

    When Scarlett Keeling was raped and killed in Goa and the needle of suspicion pointed to a strong nexus between the Goan Ministers, the drug mafia and the sex racketeers, the media played it very safe by conveniently choosing not to pursue the leads from the investigation.

    When a 14-year-old German girl was raped by Rohit Monserrate, the 21-year-old son of Goa Education Minister Atanasio Monserrate who is also a powerful political figure in Goa, and the girl’s mother was repeatedly harassed and their lawyer was grievously injured in order to coerce him to withdraw from the case, the Media didn’t find anything extraordinary in that.

    When Taslima Nasreen’s press conference was rudely disrupted and chairs and all sorts of dangerous objects were thrown at her in full glare of the cameras by the “secular” muslim jihadis of Hyderabad lead by the MLAs of Majlis Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM), the Media didnt at all find anything amiss in that.

    When Laxmi Oraon, an Adivasi woman was brutally thrashed and paraded naked through the streets of Guwahati, Assam, with the whole police paraphernalia and official state machinery in tow, the Media chose to downplay the episode since, the victim was a hapless adivasi woman from the lower strata of society.

    The Media felt that since all the above unsavoury incidents had occured in the states lead by Madam Sonia Antonia Maino’s puppets, it is all perfectly legitimate and absolutely secular and progressive.

    Kudos to the Media who are the Real Talibans of India.
    http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?Page

  424. KiranP says:

    Real Talibans of India – Media

    When a female journalist called Soumya Vishwanathan was killed in India’a national capital, the Chief Minister of Delhi Smt Sheila Dixit blamed the dead female journalist for her own tragedy by saying that she was too adventurous. The Media wholeheartedly supported Mrs Dixit and went gaga over her shortly afterwards, when she won the Delhi Assembly elections.

    When Scarlett Keeling was raped and killed in Goa and the needle of suspicion pointed to a strong nexus between the Goan Ministers, the drug mafia and the sex racketeers, the media played it very safe by conveniently choosing not to pursue the leads from the investigation.

    When a 14-year-old German girl was raped by Rohit Monserrate, the 21-year-old son of Goa Education Minister Atanasio Monserrate who is also a powerful political figure in Goa, and the girl’s mother was repeatedly harassed and their lawyer was grievously injured in order to coerce him to withdraw from the case, the Media didn’t find anything extraordinary in that.

    When Taslima Nasreen’s press conference was rudely disrupted and chairs and all sorts of dangerous objects were thrown at her in full glare of the cameras by the “secular” muslim jihadis of Hyderabad lead by the MLAs of Majlis Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM), the Media didnt at all find anything amiss in that.

    When Laxmi Oraon, an Adivasi woman was brutally thrashed and paraded naked through the streets of Guwahati, Assam, with the whole police paraphernalia and official state machinery in tow, the Media chose to downplay the episode since, the victim was a hapless adivasi woman from the lower strata of society.

    The Media felt that since all the above unsavoury incidents had occured in the states lead by Madam Sonia Antonia Maino’s puppets, it is all perfectly legitimate and absolutely secular and progressive.

    Kudos to the Media who are the Real Talibans of India.
    http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?Page

  425. KiranP says:

    Real Talibans of India – Media

    When a female journalist called Soumya Vishwanathan was killed in India’a national capital, the Chief Minister of Delhi Smt Sheila Dixit blamed the dead female journalist for her own tragedy by saying that she was too adventurous. The Media wholeheartedly supported Mrs Dixit and went gaga over her shortly afterwards, when she won the Delhi Assembly elections.

    When Scarlett Keeling was raped and killed in Goa and the needle of suspicion pointed to a strong nexus between the Goan Ministers, the drug mafia and the sex racketeers, the media played it very safe by conveniently choosing not to pursue the leads from the investigation.

    When a 14-year-old German girl was raped by Rohit Monserrate, the 21-year-old son of Goa Education Minister Atanasio Monserrate who is also a powerful political figure in Goa, and the girl’s mother was repeatedly harassed and their lawyer was grievously injured in order to coerce him to withdraw from the case, the Media didn’t find anything extraordinary in that.

    When Taslima Nasreen’s press conference was rudely disrupted and chairs and all sorts of dangerous objects were thrown at her in full glare of the cameras by the “secular” muslim jihadis of Hyderabad lead by the MLAs of Majlis Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM), the Media didnt at all find anything amiss in that.

    When Laxmi Oraon, an Adivasi woman was brutally thrashed and paraded naked through the streets of Guwahati, Assam, with the whole police paraphernalia and official state machinery in tow, the Media chose to downplay the episode since, the victim was a hapless adivasi woman from the lower strata of society.

    The Media felt that since all the above unsavoury incidents had occured in the states lead by Madam Sonia Antonia Maino’s puppets, it is all perfectly legitimate and absolutely secular and progressive.

    Kudos to the Media who are the Real Talibans of India.
    http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?Page

  426. KiranP says:

    Real Talibans of India – Media

    When a female journalist called Soumya Vishwanathan was killed in India’a national capital, the Chief Minister of Delhi Smt Sheila Dixit blamed the dead female journalist for her own tragedy by saying that she was too adventurous. The Media wholeheartedly supported Mrs Dixit and went gaga over her shortly afterwards, when she won the Delhi Assembly elections.

    When Scarlett Keeling was raped and killed in Goa and the needle of suspicion pointed to a strong nexus between the Goan Ministers, the drug mafia and the sex racketeers, the media played it very safe by conveniently choosing not to pursue the leads from the investigation.

    When a 14-year-old German girl was raped by Rohit Monserrate, the 21-year-old son of Goa Education Minister Atanasio Monserrate who is also a powerful political figure in Goa, and the girl’s mother was repeatedly harassed and their lawyer was grievously injured in order to coerce him to withdraw from the case, the Media didn’t find anything extraordinary in that.

    When Taslima Nasreen’s press conference was rudely disrupted and chairs and all sorts of dangerous objects were thrown at her in full glare of the cameras by the “secular” muslim jihadis of Hyderabad lead by the MLAs of Majlis Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM), the Media didnt at all find anything amiss in that.

    When Laxmi Oraon, an Adivasi woman was brutally thrashed and paraded naked through the streets of Guwahati, Assam, with the whole police paraphernalia and official state machinery in tow, the Media chose to downplay the episode since, the victim was a hapless adivasi woman from the lower strata of society.

    The Media felt that since all the above unsavoury incidents had occured in the states lead by Madam Sonia Antonia Maino’s puppets, it is all perfectly legitimate and absolutely secular and progressive.

    Kudos to the Media who are the Real Talibans of India.
    http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?Page

  427. KiranP says:

    Real Talibans of India – Media

    When a female journalist called Soumya Vishwanathan was killed in India’a national capital, the Chief Minister of Delhi Smt Sheila Dixit blamed the dead female journalist for her own tragedy by saying that she was too adventurous. The Media wholeheartedly supported Mrs Dixit and went gaga over her shortly afterwards, when she won the Delhi Assembly elections.

    When Scarlett Keeling was raped and killed in Goa and the needle of suspicion pointed to a strong nexus between the Goan Ministers, the drug mafia and the sex racketeers, the media played it very safe by conveniently choosing not to pursue the leads from the investigation.

    When a 14-year-old German girl was raped by Rohit Monserrate, the 21-year-old son of Goa Education Minister Atanasio Monserrate who is also a powerful political figure in Goa, and the girl’s mother was repeatedly harassed and their lawyer was grievously injured in order to coerce him to withdraw from the case, the Media didn’t find anything extraordinary in that.

    When Taslima Nasreen’s press conference was rudely disrupted and chairs and all sorts of dangerous objects were thrown at her in full glare of the cameras by the “secular” muslim jihadis of Hyderabad lead by the MLAs of Majlis Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM), the Media didnt at all find anything amiss in that.

    When Laxmi Oraon, an Adivasi woman was brutally thrashed and paraded naked through the streets of Guwahati, Assam, with the whole police paraphernalia and official state machinery in tow, the Media chose to downplay the episode since, the victim was a hapless adivasi woman from the lower strata of society.

    The Media felt that since all the above unsavoury incidents had occured in the states lead by Madam Sonia Antonia Maino’s puppets, it is all perfectly legitimate and absolutely secular and progressive.

    Kudos to the Media who are the Real Talibans of India.
    http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?Page

  428. Vinod Sharma says:

    I have noticed for long that those who shout for freedom the most to shout down others, are just not ready to grant that same freedom to others to shout them down. Sad that things have come to this pass.

  429. Vinod Sharma says:

    I have noticed for long that those who shout for freedom the most to shout down others, are just not ready to grant that same freedom to others to shout them down. Sad that things have come to this pass.

  430. Vinod Sharma says:

    I have noticed for long that those who shout for freedom the most to shout down others, are just not ready to grant that same freedom to others to shout them down. Sad that things have come to this pass.

  431. Vinod Sharma says:

    I have noticed for long that those who shout for freedom the most to shout down others, are just not ready to grant that same freedom to others to shout them down. Sad that things have come to this pass.

  432. Vinod Sharma says:

    I have noticed for long that those who shout for freedom the most to shout down others, are just not ready to grant that same freedom to others to shout them down. Sad that things have come to this pass.

  433. Vinod Sharma says:

    I have noticed for long that those who shout for freedom the most to shout down others, are just not ready to grant that same freedom to others to shout them down. Sad that things have come to this pass.

  434. Vinod Sharma says:

    I have noticed for long that those who shout for freedom the most to shout down others, are just not ready to grant that same freedom to others to shout them down. Sad that things have come to this pass.

  435. Vinod Sharma says:

    I have noticed for long that those who shout for freedom the most to shout down others, are just not ready to grant that same freedom to others to shout them down. Sad that things have come to this pass.

  436. Vinod Sharma says:

    I have noticed for long that those who shout for freedom the most to shout down others, are just not ready to grant that same freedom to others to shout them down. Sad that things have come to this pass.

  437. Vinod Sharma says:

    I have noticed for long that those who shout for freedom the most to shout down others, are just not ready to grant that same freedom to others to shout them down. Sad that things have come to this pass.

  438. rsk says:

    It is most unfortunate that a person in the media could not take criticism against herself.

    Wonder what would happen if Narendra Modi decides to sue Barkha dutt for calling him a mass murderer not once but several times. But I guess Modi has more important things to do. He can happily ignore pests roaming around him to collect his/her livelihood. 😀

    Coming back to Mr. Kunte's criticism. I believe he must have spoken some bitter truth hurting Ms. Dutt where it hurts the most. Hence he got a reaction from her. If she had a clean heart, she would have not bothered about this criticism by an individual.

  439. rsk says:

    It is most unfortunate that a person in the media could not take criticism against herself.

    Wonder what would happen if Narendra Modi decides to sue Barkha dutt for calling him a mass murderer not once but several times. But I guess Modi has more important things to do. He can happily ignore pests roaming around him to collect his/her livelihood. 😀

    Coming back to Mr. Kunte's criticism. I believe he must have spoken some bitter truth hurting Ms. Dutt where it hurts the most. Hence he got a reaction from her. If she had a clean heart, she would have not bothered about this criticism by an individual.

  440. rsk says:

    It is most unfortunate that a person in the media could not take criticism against herself.

    Wonder what would happen if Narendra Modi decides to sue Barkha dutt for calling him a mass murderer not once but several times. But I guess Modi has more important things to do. He can happily ignore pests roaming around him to collect his/her livelihood. 😀

    Coming back to Mr. Kunte's criticism. I believe he must have spoken some bitter truth hurting Ms. Dutt where it hurts the most. Hence he got a reaction from her. If she had a clean heart, she would have not bothered about this criticism by an individual.

  441. rsk says:

    It is most unfortunate that a person in the media could not take criticism against herself.

    Wonder what would happen if Narendra Modi decides to sue Barkha dutt for calling him a mass murderer not once but several times. But I guess Modi has more important things to do. He can happily ignore pests roaming around him to collect his/her livelihood. 😀

    Coming back to Mr. Kunte's criticism. I believe he must have spoken some bitter truth hurting Ms. Dutt where it hurts the most. Hence he got a reaction from her. If she had a clean heart, she would have not bothered about this criticism by an individual.

  442. rsk says:

    It is most unfortunate that a person in the media could not take criticism against herself.

    Wonder what would happen if Narendra Modi decides to sue Barkha dutt for calling him a mass murderer not once but several times. But I guess Modi has more important things to do. He can happily ignore pests roaming around him to collect his/her livelihood. 😀

    Coming back to Mr. Kunte's criticism. I believe he must have spoken some bitter truth hurting Ms. Dutt where it hurts the most. Hence he got a reaction from her. If she had a clean heart, she would have not bothered about this criticism by an individual.

  443. rsk says:

    It is most unfortunate that a person in the media could not take criticism against herself.

    Wonder what would happen if Narendra Modi decides to sue Barkha dutt for calling him a mass murderer not once but several times. But I guess Modi has more important things to do. He can happily ignore pests roaming around him to collect his/her livelihood. 😀

    Coming back to Mr. Kunte's criticism. I believe he must have spoken some bitter truth hurting Ms. Dutt where it hurts the most. Hence he got a reaction from her. If she had a clean heart, she would have not bothered about this criticism by an individual.

  444. rsk says:

    It is most unfortunate that a person in the media could not take criticism against herself.

    Wonder what would happen if Narendra Modi decides to sue Barkha dutt for calling him a mass murderer not once but several times. But I guess Modi has more important things to do. He can happily ignore pests roaming around him to collect his/her livelihood. 😀

    Coming back to Mr. Kunte's criticism. I believe he must have spoken some bitter truth hurting Ms. Dutt where it hurts the most. Hence he got a reaction from her. If she had a clean heart, she would have not bothered about this criticism by an individual.

  445. rsk says:

    It is most unfortunate that a person in the media could not take criticism against herself.

    Wonder what would happen if Narendra Modi decides to sue Barkha dutt for calling him a mass murderer not once but several times. But I guess Modi has more important things to do. He can happily ignore pests roaming around him to collect his/her livelihood. 😀

    Coming back to Mr. Kunte's criticism. I believe he must have spoken some bitter truth hurting Ms. Dutt where it hurts the most. Hence he got a reaction from her. If she had a clean heart, she would have not bothered about this criticism by an individual.

  446. rsk says:

    It is most unfortunate that a person in the media could not take criticism against herself.

    Wonder what would happen if Narendra Modi decides to sue Barkha dutt for calling him a mass murderer not once but several times. But I guess Modi has more important things to do. He can happily ignore pests roaming around him to collect his/her livelihood. 😀

    Coming back to Mr. Kunte's criticism. I believe he must have spoken some bitter truth hurting Ms. Dutt where it hurts the most. Hence he got a reaction from her. If she had a clean heart, she would have not bothered about this criticism by an individual.

  447. rsk says:

    It is most unfortunate that a person in the media could not take criticism against herself.

    Wonder what would happen if Narendra Modi decides to sue Barkha dutt for calling him a mass murderer not once but several times. But I guess Modi has more important things to do. He can happily ignore pests roaming around him to collect his/her livelihood. 😀

    Coming back to Mr. Kunte's criticism. I believe he must have spoken some bitter truth hurting Ms. Dutt where it hurts the most. Hence he got a reaction from her. If she had a clean heart, she would have not bothered about this criticism by an individual.

  448. Alex says:

    Uhm?! As I see it:

    The blogger exercised his freedom to criticize Ms Dutt/NDTV.
    NDTV/Ms Dutt exercised their freedom to defend themselves legally (presumably).
    The blogger retracted his criticism, (again, presumably) because he had nothing to back up his allegations, with. He had the freedom to stand by his statement, and defend himself legally, didn't he?

    I don't think it's fair to imply that NDTV/Ms Dutt should simply sit back and take someone publicly maligning them, just because they happen to be part of the 'Big Bad Indian News Media'.

    Do keep in mind that anyone who is shown in poor light on NDTV (by Ms Dutt or anyone else) also has the freedom to legally (or otherwise, as is often the practice) defend themselves.

  449. Alex says:

    Uhm?! As I see it:

    The blogger exercised his freedom to criticize Ms Dutt/NDTV.
    NDTV/Ms Dutt exercised their freedom to defend themselves legally (presumably).
    The blogger retracted his criticism, (again, presumably) because he had nothing to back up his allegations, with. He had the freedom to stand by his statement, and defend himself legally, didn't he?

    I don't think it's fair to imply that NDTV/Ms Dutt should simply sit back and take someone publicly maligning them, just because they happen to be part of the 'Big Bad Indian News Media'.

    Do keep in mind that anyone who is shown in poor light on NDTV (by Ms Dutt or anyone else) also has the freedom to legally (or otherwise, as is often the practice) defend themselves.

  450. Alex says:

    Uhm?! As I see it:

    The blogger exercised his freedom to criticize Ms Dutt/NDTV.
    NDTV/Ms Dutt exercised their freedom to defend themselves legally (presumably).
    The blogger retracted his criticism, (again, presumably) because he had nothing to back up his allegations, with. He had the freedom to stand by his statement, and defend himself legally, didn't he?

    I don't think it's fair to imply that NDTV/Ms Dutt should simply sit back and take someone publicly maligning them, just because they happen to be part of the 'Big Bad Indian News Media'.

    Do keep in mind that anyone who is shown in poor light on NDTV (by Ms Dutt or anyone else) also has the freedom to legally (or otherwise, as is often the practice) defend themselves.

  451. Alex says:

    Uhm?! As I see it:

    The blogger exercised his freedom to criticize Ms Dutt/NDTV.
    NDTV/Ms Dutt exercised their freedom to defend themselves legally (presumably).
    The blogger retracted his criticism, (again, presumably) because he had nothing to back up his allegations, with. He had the freedom to stand by his statement, and defend himself legally, didn't he?

    I don't think it's fair to imply that NDTV/Ms Dutt should simply sit back and take someone publicly maligning them, just because they happen to be part of the 'Big Bad Indian News Media'.

    Do keep in mind that anyone who is shown in poor light on NDTV (by Ms Dutt or anyone else) also has the freedom to legally (or otherwise, as is often the practice) defend themselves.

  452. Alex says:

    Uhm?! As I see it:

    The blogger exercised his freedom to criticize Ms Dutt/NDTV.
    NDTV/Ms Dutt exercised their freedom to defend themselves legally (presumably).
    The blogger retracted his criticism, (again, presumably) because he had nothing to back up his allegations, with. He had the freedom to stand by his statement, and defend himself legally, didn't he?

    I don't think it's fair to imply that NDTV/Ms Dutt should simply sit back and take someone publicly maligning them, just because they happen to be part of the 'Big Bad Indian News Media'.

    Do keep in mind that anyone who is shown in poor light on NDTV (by Ms Dutt or anyone else) also has the freedom to legally (or otherwise, as is often the practice) defend themselves.

  453. Alex says:

    Uhm?! As I see it:

    The blogger exercised his freedom to criticize Ms Dutt/NDTV.
    NDTV/Ms Dutt exercised their freedom to defend themselves legally (presumably).
    The blogger retracted his criticism, (again, presumably) because he had nothing to back up his allegations, with. He had the freedom to stand by his statement, and defend himself legally, didn't he?

    I don't think it's fair to imply that NDTV/Ms Dutt should simply sit back and take someone publicly maligning them, just because they happen to be part of the 'Big Bad Indian News Media'.

    Do keep in mind that anyone who is shown in poor light on NDTV (by Ms Dutt or anyone else) also has the freedom to legally (or otherwise, as is often the practice) defend themselves.

  454. Alex says:

    Uhm?! As I see it:

    The blogger exercised his freedom to criticize Ms Dutt/NDTV.
    NDTV/Ms Dutt exercised their freedom to defend themselves legally (presumably).
    The blogger retracted his criticism, (again, presumably) because he had nothing to back up his allegations, with. He had the freedom to stand by his statement, and defend himself legally, didn't he?

    I don't think it's fair to imply that NDTV/Ms Dutt should simply sit back and take someone publicly maligning them, just because they happen to be part of the 'Big Bad Indian News Media'.

    Do keep in mind that anyone who is shown in poor light on NDTV (by Ms Dutt or anyone else) also has the freedom to legally (or otherwise, as is often the practice) defend themselves.

  455. Alex says:

    Uhm?! As I see it:

    The blogger exercised his freedom to criticize Ms Dutt/NDTV.
    NDTV/Ms Dutt exercised their freedom to defend themselves legally (presumably).
    The blogger retracted his criticism, (again, presumably) because he had nothing to back up his allegations, with. He had the freedom to stand by his statement, and defend himself legally, didn't he?

    I don't think it's fair to imply that NDTV/Ms Dutt should simply sit back and take someone publicly maligning them, just because they happen to be part of the 'Big Bad Indian News Media'.

    Do keep in mind that anyone who is shown in poor light on NDTV (by Ms Dutt or anyone else) also has the freedom to legally (or otherwise, as is often the practice) defend themselves.

  456. Alex says:

    Uhm?! As I see it:

    The blogger exercised his freedom to criticize Ms Dutt/NDTV.
    NDTV/Ms Dutt exercised their freedom to defend themselves legally (presumably).
    The blogger retracted his criticism, (again, presumably) because he had nothing to back up his allegations, with. He had the freedom to stand by his statement, and defend himself legally, didn't he?

    I don't think it's fair to imply that NDTV/Ms Dutt should simply sit back and take someone publicly maligning them, just because they happen to be part of the 'Big Bad Indian News Media'.

    Do keep in mind that anyone who is shown in poor light on NDTV (by Ms Dutt or anyone else) also has the freedom to legally (or otherwise, as is often the practice) defend themselves.

  457. Alex says:

    Uhm?! As I see it:

    The blogger exercised his freedom to criticize Ms Dutt/NDTV.
    NDTV/Ms Dutt exercised their freedom to defend themselves legally (presumably).
    The blogger retracted his criticism, (again, presumably) because he had nothing to back up his allegations, with. He had the freedom to stand by his statement, and defend himself legally, didn't he?

    I don't think it's fair to imply that NDTV/Ms Dutt should simply sit back and take someone publicly maligning them, just because they happen to be part of the 'Big Bad Indian News Media'.

    Do keep in mind that anyone who is shown in poor light on NDTV (by Ms Dutt or anyone else) also has the freedom to legally (or otherwise, as is often the practice) defend themselves.

  458. Shan says:

    Umm…as I see it, this is more than just a freedom of speech issue. Far be it for me to defend Barkha Dutt and her shrillness, but let's for a moment realise what Chaitanya actually implied. He implied that she caused murders of people. Even if broadcasts were responsible for getting information to the terrorists, all the media was to be blamed, not just Barkha.

    The post was also defamatory in that is actually accused her and her company of causing the death of Hemant Karkare. This is demonstrably false as multiple inquiried into his death has proven since.

    Anyone, including all the protesters and defenders of freedom of speech in her position would take offence to being called a murder facilitator or accomplice. As I see it in her place I'd also have taken legal action. The only thing stopping me would be lack of resources. She has the resopirces and legal help, and did take action.

    I don't see what the hoohaa is about.

  459. Shan says:

    Umm…as I see it, this is more than just a freedom of speech issue. Far be it for me to defend Barkha Dutt and her shrillness, but let's for a moment realise what Chaitanya actually implied. He implied that she caused murders of people. Even if broadcasts were responsible for getting information to the terrorists, all the media was to be blamed, not just Barkha.

    The post was also defamatory in that is actually accused her and her company of causing the death of Hemant Karkare. This is demonstrably false as multiple inquiried into his death has proven since.

    Anyone, including all the protesters and defenders of freedom of speech in her position would take offence to being called a murder facilitator or accomplice. As I see it in her place I'd also have taken legal action. The only thing stopping me would be lack of resources. She has the resopirces and legal help, and did take action.

    I don't see what the hoohaa is about.

  460. Shan says:

    Umm…as I see it, this is more than just a freedom of speech issue. Far be it for me to defend Barkha Dutt and her shrillness, but let's for a moment realise what Chaitanya actually implied. He implied that she caused murders of people. Even if broadcasts were responsible for getting information to the terrorists, all the media was to be blamed, not just Barkha.

    The post was also defamatory in that is actually accused her and her company of causing the death of Hemant Karkare. This is demonstrably false as multiple inquiried into his death has proven since.

    Anyone, including all the protesters and defenders of freedom of speech in her position would take offence to being called a murder facilitator or accomplice. As I see it in her place I'd also have taken legal action. The only thing stopping me would be lack of resources. She has the resopirces and legal help, and did take action.

    I don't see what the hoohaa is about.

  461. Shan says:

    Umm…as I see it, this is more than just a freedom of speech issue. Far be it for me to defend Barkha Dutt and her shrillness, but let's for a moment realise what Chaitanya actually implied. He implied that she caused murders of people. Even if broadcasts were responsible for getting information to the terrorists, all the media was to be blamed, not just Barkha.

    The post was also defamatory in that is actually accused her and her company of causing the death of Hemant Karkare. This is demonstrably false as multiple inquiried into his death has proven since.

    Anyone, including all the protesters and defenders of freedom of speech in her position would take offence to being called a murder facilitator or accomplice. As I see it in her place I'd also have taken legal action. The only thing stopping me would be lack of resources. She has the resopirces and legal help, and did take action.

    I don't see what the hoohaa is about.

  462. Shan says:

    Umm…as I see it, this is more than just a freedom of speech issue. Far be it for me to defend Barkha Dutt and her shrillness, but let's for a moment realise what Chaitanya actually implied. He implied that she caused murders of people. Even if broadcasts were responsible for getting information to the terrorists, all the media was to be blamed, not just Barkha.

    The post was also defamatory in that is actually accused her and her company of causing the death of Hemant Karkare. This is demonstrably false as multiple inquiried into his death has proven since.

    Anyone, including all the protesters and defenders of freedom of speech in her position would take offence to being called a murder facilitator or accomplice. As I see it in her place I'd also have taken legal action. The only thing stopping me would be lack of resources. She has the resopirces and legal help, and did take action.

    I don't see what the hoohaa is about.

  463. Shan says:

    Umm…as I see it, this is more than just a freedom of speech issue. Far be it for me to defend Barkha Dutt and her shrillness, but let's for a moment realise what Chaitanya actually implied. He implied that she caused murders of people. Even if broadcasts were responsible for getting information to the terrorists, all the media was to be blamed, not just Barkha.

    The post was also defamatory in that is actually accused her and her company of causing the death of Hemant Karkare. This is demonstrably false as multiple inquiried into his death has proven since.

    Anyone, including all the protesters and defenders of freedom of speech in her position would take offence to being called a murder facilitator or accomplice. As I see it in her place I'd also have taken legal action. The only thing stopping me would be lack of resources. She has the resopirces and legal help, and did take action.

    I don't see what the hoohaa is about.

  464. Shan says:

    Umm…as I see it, this is more than just a freedom of speech issue. Far be it for me to defend Barkha Dutt and her shrillness, but let's for a moment realise what Chaitanya actually implied. He implied that she caused murders of people. Even if broadcasts were responsible for getting information to the terrorists, all the media was to be blamed, not just Barkha.

    The post was also defamatory in that is actually accused her and her company of causing the death of Hemant Karkare. This is demonstrably false as multiple inquiried into his death has proven since.

    Anyone, including all the protesters and defenders of freedom of speech in her position would take offence to being called a murder facilitator or accomplice. As I see it in her place I'd also have taken legal action. The only thing stopping me would be lack of resources. She has the resopirces and legal help, and did take action.

    I don't see what the hoohaa is about.

  465. Shan says:

    Umm…as I see it, this is more than just a freedom of speech issue. Far be it for me to defend Barkha Dutt and her shrillness, but let's for a moment realise what Chaitanya actually implied. He implied that she caused murders of people. Even if broadcasts were responsible for getting information to the terrorists, all the media was to be blamed, not just Barkha.

    The post was also defamatory in that is actually accused her and her company of causing the death of Hemant Karkare. This is demonstrably false as multiple inquiried into his death has proven since.

    Anyone, including all the protesters and defenders of freedom of speech in her position would take offence to being called a murder facilitator or accomplice. As I see it in her place I'd also have taken legal action. The only thing stopping me would be lack of resources. She has the resopirces and legal help, and did take action.

    I don't see what the hoohaa is about.

  466. Shan says:

    Umm…as I see it, this is more than just a freedom of speech issue. Far be it for me to defend Barkha Dutt and her shrillness, but let's for a moment realise what Chaitanya actually implied. He implied that she caused murders of people. Even if broadcasts were responsible for getting information to the terrorists, all the media was to be blamed, not just Barkha.

    The post was also defamatory in that is actually accused her and her company of causing the death of Hemant Karkare. This is demonstrably false as multiple inquiried into his death has proven since.

    Anyone, including all the protesters and defenders of freedom of speech in her position would take offence to being called a murder facilitator or accomplice. As I see it in her place I'd also have taken legal action. The only thing stopping me would be lack of resources. She has the resopirces and legal help, and did take action.

    I don't see what the hoohaa is about.

  467. Shan says:

    Umm…as I see it, this is more than just a freedom of speech issue. Far be it for me to defend Barkha Dutt and her shrillness, but let's for a moment realise what Chaitanya actually implied. He implied that she caused murders of people. Even if broadcasts were responsible for getting information to the terrorists, all the media was to be blamed, not just Barkha.

    The post was also defamatory in that is actually accused her and her company of causing the death of Hemant Karkare. This is demonstrably false as multiple inquiried into his death has proven since.

    Anyone, including all the protesters and defenders of freedom of speech in her position would take offence to being called a murder facilitator or accomplice. As I see it in her place I'd also have taken legal action. The only thing stopping me would be lack of resources. She has the resopirces and legal help, and did take action.

    I don't see what the hoohaa is about.

  468. Dr Zen says:

    Donkeys,
    braying at night
    Bloggers…!

    A haiku for all ye folks. Enjoy.

  469. Dr Zen says:

    Donkeys,
    braying at night
    Bloggers…!

    A haiku for all ye folks. Enjoy.

  470. Dr Zen says:

    Donkeys,
    braying at night
    Bloggers…!

    A haiku for all ye folks. Enjoy.

  471. Dr Zen says:

    Donkeys,
    braying at night
    Bloggers…!

    A haiku for all ye folks. Enjoy.

  472. Dr Zen says:

    Donkeys,
    braying at night
    Bloggers…!

    A haiku for all ye folks. Enjoy.

  473. Dr Zen says:

    Donkeys,
    braying at night
    Bloggers…!

    A haiku for all ye folks. Enjoy.

  474. Dr Zen says:

    Donkeys,
    braying at night
    Bloggers…!

    A haiku for all ye folks. Enjoy.

  475. Dr Zen says:

    Donkeys,
    braying at night
    Bloggers…!

    A haiku for all ye folks. Enjoy.

  476. Dr Zen says:

    Donkeys,
    braying at night
    Bloggers…!

    A haiku for all ye folks. Enjoy.

  477. Dr Zen says:

    Donkeys,
    braying at night
    Bloggers…!

    A haiku for all ye folks. Enjoy.

  478. Dr Zen says:

    Mind is like
    Monkey on mango tree
    Cant be still….

    pkr, thats for you.

  479. Dr Zen says:

    Mind is like
    Monkey on mango tree
    Cant be still….

    pkr, thats for you.

  480. Dr Zen says:

    Mind is like
    Monkey on mango tree
    Cant be still….

    pkr, thats for you.

  481. Dr Zen says:

    Mind is like
    Monkey on mango tree
    Cant be still….

    pkr, thats for you.

  482. Dr Zen says:

    Mind is like
    Monkey on mango tree
    Cant be still….

    pkr, thats for you.

  483. Dr Zen says:

    Mind is like
    Monkey on mango tree
    Cant be still….

    pkr, thats for you.

  484. Dr Zen says:

    Mind is like
    Monkey on mango tree
    Cant be still….

    pkr, thats for you.

  485. Dr Zen says:

    Mind is like
    Monkey on mango tree
    Cant be still….

    pkr, thats for you.

  486. Dr Zen says:

    Mind is like
    Monkey on mango tree
    Cant be still….

    pkr, thats for you.

  487. Dr Zen says:

    Mind is like
    Monkey on mango tree
    Cant be still….

    pkr, thats for you.

  488. Dr Zen says:

    Controversies
    Life or blog
    Traffic…!

  489. Dr Zen says:

    Controversies
    Life or blog
    Traffic…!

  490. Dr Zen says:

    Controversies
    Life or blog
    Traffic…!

  491. Dr Zen says:

    Controversies
    Life or blog
    Traffic…!

  492. Dr Zen says:

    Controversies
    Life or blog
    Traffic…!

  493. Dr Zen says:

    Controversies
    Life or blog
    Traffic…!

  494. Dr Zen says:

    Controversies
    Life or blog
    Traffic…!

  495. Dr Zen says:

    Controversies
    Life or blog
    Traffic…!

  496. Dr Zen says:

    Controversies
    Life or blog
    Traffic…!

  497. Dr Zen says:

    Controversies
    Life or blog
    Traffic…!

  498. Shripriya says:

    PKR (sorry been without internet access for almost a day) – I never said a journalists job was easy. If they are easily sued, then they should realize how horrible it feels. AND, they should realize that when they are sued, their organizations pay their legal fees. When they sue a small blogger, he's hanging out to dry on his own.

    Ms. Dutt does have a right to defend herself, but why crush an ant with a sledgehammer? She could have asked for a withdrawal and left it at that. @sumants (twitter) had an excellent point on this vein.

  499. Shripriya says:

    PKR (sorry been without internet access for almost a day) – I never said a journalists job was easy. If they are easily sued, then they should realize how horrible it feels. AND, they should realize that when they are sued, their organizations pay their legal fees. When they sue a small blogger, he's hanging out to dry on his own.

    Ms. Dutt does have a right to defend herself, but why crush an ant with a sledgehammer? She could have asked for a withdrawal and left it at that. @sumants (twitter) had an excellent point on this vein.

  500. Shripriya says:

    PKR (sorry been without internet access for almost a day) – I never said a journalists job was easy. If they are easily sued, then they should realize how horrible it feels. AND, they should realize that when they are sued, their organizations pay their legal fees. When they sue a small blogger, he's hanging out to dry on his own.

    Ms. Dutt does have a right to defend herself, but why crush an ant with a sledgehammer? She could have asked for a withdrawal and left it at that. @sumants (twitter) had an excellent point on this vein.

  501. Shripriya says:

    PKR (sorry been without internet access for almost a day) – I never said a journalists job was easy. If they are easily sued, then they should realize how horrible it feels. AND, they should realize that when they are sued, their organizations pay their legal fees. When they sue a small blogger, he's hanging out to dry on his own.

    Ms. Dutt does have a right to defend herself, but why crush an ant with a sledgehammer? She could have asked for a withdrawal and left it at that. @sumants (twitter) had an excellent point on this vein.

  502. Shripriya says:

    PKR (sorry been without internet access for almost a day) – I never said a journalists job was easy. If they are easily sued, then they should realize how horrible it feels. AND, they should realize that when they are sued, their organizations pay their legal fees. When they sue a small blogger, he's hanging out to dry on his own.

    Ms. Dutt does have a right to defend herself, but why crush an ant with a sledgehammer? She could have asked for a withdrawal and left it at that. @sumants (twitter) had an excellent point on this vein.

  503. Shripriya says:

    PKR (sorry been without internet access for almost a day) – I never said a journalists job was easy. If they are easily sued, then they should realize how horrible it feels. AND, they should realize that when they are sued, their organizations pay their legal fees. When they sue a small blogger, he's hanging out to dry on his own.

    Ms. Dutt does have a right to defend herself, but why crush an ant with a sledgehammer? She could have asked for a withdrawal and left it at that. @sumants (twitter) had an excellent point on this vein.

  504. Shripriya says:

    PKR (sorry been without internet access for almost a day) – I never said a journalists job was easy. If they are easily sued, then they should realize how horrible it feels. AND, they should realize that when they are sued, their organizations pay their legal fees. When they sue a small blogger, he's hanging out to dry on his own.

    Ms. Dutt does have a right to defend herself, but why crush an ant with a sledgehammer? She could have asked for a withdrawal and left it at that. @sumants (twitter) had an excellent point on this vein.

  505. Shripriya says:

    PKR (sorry been without internet access for almost a day) – I never said a journalists job was easy. If they are easily sued, then they should realize how horrible it feels. AND, they should realize that when they are sued, their organizations pay their legal fees. When they sue a small blogger, he's hanging out to dry on his own.

    Ms. Dutt does have a right to defend herself, but why crush an ant with a sledgehammer? She could have asked for a withdrawal and left it at that. @sumants (twitter) had an excellent point on this vein.

  506. Shripriya says:

    PKR (sorry been without internet access for almost a day) – I never said a journalists job was easy. If they are easily sued, then they should realize how horrible it feels. AND, they should realize that when they are sued, their organizations pay their legal fees. When they sue a small blogger, he's hanging out to dry on his own.

    Ms. Dutt does have a right to defend herself, but why crush an ant with a sledgehammer? She could have asked for a withdrawal and left it at that. @sumants (twitter) had an excellent point on this vein.

  507. Shripriya says:

    PKR (sorry been without internet access for almost a day) – I never said a journalists job was easy. If they are easily sued, then they should realize how horrible it feels. AND, they should realize that when they are sued, their organizations pay their legal fees. When they sue a small blogger, he's hanging out to dry on his own.

    Ms. Dutt does have a right to defend herself, but why crush an ant with a sledgehammer? She could have asked for a withdrawal and left it at that. @sumants (twitter) had an excellent point on this vein.

  508. Shripriya says:

    Re: your last paragraph – standing up to a legal suit is not that easy. As bonobashi says as well – there are a fair number of costs and for a guy who's working and supports a family that is not easily dismissed. FYI, Chyetanya lives in the Netherlands, so defending himself in court in Delhi adds to the burden.

  509. Shripriya says:

    Re: your last paragraph – standing up to a legal suit is not that easy. As bonobashi says as well – there are a fair number of costs and for a guy who's working and supports a family that is not easily dismissed. FYI, Chyetanya lives in the Netherlands, so defending himself in court in Delhi adds to the burden.

  510. Shripriya says:

    Re: your last paragraph – standing up to a legal suit is not that easy. As bonobashi says as well – there are a fair number of costs and for a guy who's working and supports a family that is not easily dismissed. FYI, Chyetanya lives in the Netherlands, so defending himself in court in Delhi adds to the burden.

  511. Shripriya says:

    Re: your last paragraph – standing up to a legal suit is not that easy. As bonobashi says as well – there are a fair number of costs and for a guy who's working and supports a family that is not easily dismissed. FYI, Chyetanya lives in the Netherlands, so defending himself in court in Delhi adds to the burden.

  512. Shripriya says:

    Re: your last paragraph – standing up to a legal suit is not that easy. As bonobashi says as well – there are a fair number of costs and for a guy who's working and supports a family that is not easily dismissed. FYI, Chyetanya lives in the Netherlands, so defending himself in court in Delhi adds to the burden.

  513. Shripriya says:

    Re: your last paragraph – standing up to a legal suit is not that easy. As bonobashi says as well – there are a fair number of costs and for a guy who's working and supports a family that is not easily dismissed. FYI, Chyetanya lives in the Netherlands, so defending himself in court in Delhi adds to the burden.

  514. Shripriya says:

    Re: your last paragraph – standing up to a legal suit is not that easy. As bonobashi says as well – there are a fair number of costs and for a guy who's working and supports a family that is not easily dismissed. FYI, Chyetanya lives in the Netherlands, so defending himself in court in Delhi adds to the burden.

  515. Shripriya says:

    Re: your last paragraph – standing up to a legal suit is not that easy. As bonobashi says as well – there are a fair number of costs and for a guy who's working and supports a family that is not easily dismissed. FYI, Chyetanya lives in the Netherlands, so defending himself in court in Delhi adds to the burden.

  516. Shripriya says:

    Re: your last paragraph – standing up to a legal suit is not that easy. As bonobashi says as well – there are a fair number of costs and for a guy who's working and supports a family that is not easily dismissed. FYI, Chyetanya lives in the Netherlands, so defending himself in court in Delhi adds to the burden.

  517. Shripriya says:

    Re: your last paragraph – standing up to a legal suit is not that easy. As bonobashi says as well – there are a fair number of costs and for a guy who's working and supports a family that is not easily dismissed. FYI, Chyetanya lives in the Netherlands, so defending himself in court in Delhi adds to the burden.

  518. Indian says:

    I agree with you … mahn.. real bad on her part … you cannot be emotional when you are a journalist.. of course you can go and cover on the warfront.. but that indeed create problems for the armymen who are already saving lives…

    i just wonder would not it be another problem for armymen to arrange for the security of these so called “journalists”

  519. Indian says:

    I agree with you … mahn.. real bad on her part … you cannot be emotional when you are a journalist.. of course you can go and cover on the warfront.. but that indeed create problems for the armymen who are already saving lives…

    i just wonder would not it be another problem for armymen to arrange for the security of these so called “journalists”

  520. Indian says:

    I agree with you … mahn.. real bad on her part … you cannot be emotional when you are a journalist.. of course you can go and cover on the warfront.. but that indeed create problems for the armymen who are already saving lives…

    i just wonder would not it be another problem for armymen to arrange for the security of these so called “journalists”

  521. Indian says:

    I agree with you … mahn.. real bad on her part … you cannot be emotional when you are a journalist.. of course you can go and cover on the warfront.. but that indeed create problems for the armymen who are already saving lives…

    i just wonder would not it be another problem for armymen to arrange for the security of these so called “journalists”

  522. Indian says:

    I agree with you … mahn.. real bad on her part … you cannot be emotional when you are a journalist.. of course you can go and cover on the warfront.. but that indeed create problems for the armymen who are already saving lives…

    i just wonder would not it be another problem for armymen to arrange for the security of these so called “journalists”

  523. Indian says:

    I agree with you … mahn.. real bad on her part … you cannot be emotional when you are a journalist.. of course you can go and cover on the warfront.. but that indeed create problems for the armymen who are already saving lives…

    i just wonder would not it be another problem for armymen to arrange for the security of these so called “journalists”

  524. Indian says:

    I agree with you … mahn.. real bad on her part … you cannot be emotional when you are a journalist.. of course you can go and cover on the warfront.. but that indeed create problems for the armymen who are already saving lives…

    i just wonder would not it be another problem for armymen to arrange for the security of these so called “journalists”

  525. Indian says:

    I agree with you … mahn.. real bad on her part … you cannot be emotional when you are a journalist.. of course you can go and cover on the warfront.. but that indeed create problems for the armymen who are already saving lives…

    i just wonder would not it be another problem for armymen to arrange for the security of these so called “journalists”

  526. Indian says:

    I agree with you … mahn.. real bad on her part … you cannot be emotional when you are a journalist.. of course you can go and cover on the warfront.. but that indeed create problems for the armymen who are already saving lives…

    i just wonder would not it be another problem for armymen to arrange for the security of these so called “journalists”

  527. Indian says:

    I agree with you … mahn.. real bad on her part … you cannot be emotional when you are a journalist.. of course you can go and cover on the warfront.. but that indeed create problems for the armymen who are already saving lives…

    i just wonder would not it be another problem for armymen to arrange for the security of these so called “journalists”

  528. Shripriya says:

    Harshad, while you are entitled to your view, I do not support name calling. Please refrain. Also, I strongly oppose criticizing anyone for something they have no control over – namely, their looks. What one has control over is one's personality.

    I will not edit or delete your comment, but I will say that I disagree strongly with how you expressed your views. Please keep that in mind while commenting on my blog. Thank you.

  529. Shripriya says:

    Harshad, while you are entitled to your view, I do not support name calling. Please refrain. Also, I strongly oppose criticizing anyone for something they have no control over – namely, their looks. What one has control over is one's personality.

    I will not edit or delete your comment, but I will say that I disagree strongly with how you expressed your views. Please keep that in mind while commenting on my blog. Thank you.

  530. Shripriya says:

    Harshad, while you are entitled to your view, I do not support name calling. Please refrain. Also, I strongly oppose criticizing anyone for something they have no control over – namely, their looks. What one has control over is one's personality.

    I will not edit or delete your comment, but I will say that I disagree strongly with how you expressed your views. Please keep that in mind while commenting on my blog. Thank you.

  531. Shripriya says:

    Harshad, while you are entitled to your view, I do not support name calling. Please refrain. Also, I strongly oppose criticizing anyone for something they have no control over – namely, their looks. What one has control over is one's personality.

    I will not edit or delete your comment, but I will say that I disagree strongly with how you expressed your views. Please keep that in mind while commenting on my blog. Thank you.

  532. Shripriya says:

    Harshad, while you are entitled to your view, I do not support name calling. Please refrain. Also, I strongly oppose criticizing anyone for something they have no control over – namely, their looks. What one has control over is one's personality.

    I will not edit or delete your comment, but I will say that I disagree strongly with how you expressed your views. Please keep that in mind while commenting on my blog. Thank you.

  533. Shripriya says:

    Harshad, while you are entitled to your view, I do not support name calling. Please refrain. Also, I strongly oppose criticizing anyone for something they have no control over – namely, their looks. What one has control over is one's personality.

    I will not edit or delete your comment, but I will say that I disagree strongly with how you expressed your views. Please keep that in mind while commenting on my blog. Thank you.

  534. Shripriya says:

    Harshad, while you are entitled to your view, I do not support name calling. Please refrain. Also, I strongly oppose criticizing anyone for something they have no control over – namely, their looks. What one has control over is one's personality.

    I will not edit or delete your comment, but I will say that I disagree strongly with how you expressed your views. Please keep that in mind while commenting on my blog. Thank you.

  535. Shripriya says:

    Harshad, while you are entitled to your view, I do not support name calling. Please refrain. Also, I strongly oppose criticizing anyone for something they have no control over – namely, their looks. What one has control over is one's personality.

    I will not edit or delete your comment, but I will say that I disagree strongly with how you expressed your views. Please keep that in mind while commenting on my blog. Thank you.

  536. Shripriya says:

    Harshad, while you are entitled to your view, I do not support name calling. Please refrain. Also, I strongly oppose criticizing anyone for something they have no control over – namely, their looks. What one has control over is one's personality.

    I will not edit or delete your comment, but I will say that I disagree strongly with how you expressed your views. Please keep that in mind while commenting on my blog. Thank you.

  537. Shripriya says:

    Harshad, while you are entitled to your view, I do not support name calling. Please refrain. Also, I strongly oppose criticizing anyone for something they have no control over – namely, their looks. What one has control over is one's personality.

    I will not edit or delete your comment, but I will say that I disagree strongly with how you expressed your views. Please keep that in mind while commenting on my blog. Thank you.

  538. Dr Zen says:

    “Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality ”

    Its not about having an ugly face, its about ugly mentality. This should be enough. Although no one can comment about looks, one can definitely comment against mentality.

  539. Dr Zen says:

    “Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality ”

    Its not about having an ugly face, its about ugly mentality. This should be enough. Although no one can comment about looks, one can definitely comment against mentality.

  540. Dr Zen says:

    “Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality ”

    Its not about having an ugly face, its about ugly mentality. This should be enough. Although no one can comment about looks, one can definitely comment against mentality.

  541. Dr Zen says:

    “Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality ”

    Its not about having an ugly face, its about ugly mentality. This should be enough. Although no one can comment about looks, one can definitely comment against mentality.

  542. Dr Zen says:

    “Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality ”

    Its not about having an ugly face, its about ugly mentality. This should be enough. Although no one can comment about looks, one can definitely comment against mentality.

  543. Dr Zen says:

    “Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality ”

    Its not about having an ugly face, its about ugly mentality. This should be enough. Although no one can comment about looks, one can definitely comment against mentality.

  544. Dr Zen says:

    “Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality ”

    Its not about having an ugly face, its about ugly mentality. This should be enough. Although no one can comment about looks, one can definitely comment against mentality.

  545. Dr Zen says:

    “Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality ”

    Its not about having an ugly face, its about ugly mentality. This should be enough. Although no one can comment about looks, one can definitely comment against mentality.

  546. Dr Zen says:

    “Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality ”

    Its not about having an ugly face, its about ugly mentality. This should be enough. Although no one can comment about looks, one can definitely comment against mentality.

  547. Dr Zen says:

    “Barkha Dutt is just a name of a crook mentality ”

    Its not about having an ugly face, its about ugly mentality. This should be enough. Although no one can comment about looks, one can definitely comment against mentality.

  548. Shripriya says:

    Sanjukta, you are very quick to jump to judgment yourself, aren't you? I was with very spotty internet access for almost a day and hence the delay. As I replied to you on twitter , I don't believe in deleting or modifying comments – they are not my words to edit.

    And you talk of using tones of respect to address others and your comment drips of sarcasm and, frankly, superiority. Is that how you define “respect”? Should one only be respectful to someone who is a “leading name in her field”? 🙂

  549. Shripriya says:

    Sanjukta, you are very quick to jump to judgment yourself, aren't you? I was with very spotty internet access for almost a day and hence the delay. As I replied to you on twitter , I don't believe in deleting or modifying comments – they are not my words to edit.

    And you talk of using tones of respect to address others and your comment drips of sarcasm and, frankly, superiority. Is that how you define “respect”? Should one only be respectful to someone who is a “leading name in her field”? 🙂

  550. Shripriya says:

    Sanjukta, you are very quick to jump to judgment yourself, aren't you? I was with very spotty internet access for almost a day and hence the delay. As I replied to you on twitter , I don't believe in deleting or modifying comments – they are not my words to edit.

    And you talk of using tones of respect to address others and your comment drips of sarcasm and, frankly, superiority. Is that how you define “respect”? Should one only be respectful to someone who is a “leading name in her field”? 🙂

  551. Shripriya says:

    Sanjukta, you are very quick to jump to judgment yourself, aren't you? I was with very spotty internet access for almost a day and hence the delay. As I replied to you on twitter , I don't believe in deleting or modifying comments – they are not my words to edit.

    And you talk of using tones of respect to address others and your comment drips of sarcasm and, frankly, superiority. Is that how you define “respect”? Should one only be respectful to someone who is a “leading name in her field”? 🙂

  552. Shripriya says:

    Sanjukta, you are very quick to jump to judgment yourself, aren't you? I was with very spotty internet access for almost a day and hence the delay. As I replied to you on twitter , I don't believe in deleting or modifying comments – they are not my words to edit.

    And you talk of using tones of respect to address others and your comment drips of sarcasm and, frankly, superiority. Is that how you define “respect”? Should one only be respectful to someone who is a “leading name in her field”? 🙂

  553. Shripriya says:

    Sanjukta, you are very quick to jump to judgment yourself, aren't you? I was with very spotty internet access for almost a day and hence the delay. As I replied to you on twitter , I don't believe in deleting or modifying comments – they are not my words to edit.

    And you talk of using tones of respect to address others and your comment drips of sarcasm and, frankly, superiority. Is that how you define “respect”? Should one only be respectful to someone who is a “leading name in her field”? 🙂

  554. Shripriya says:

    Sanjukta, you are very quick to jump to judgment yourself, aren't you? I was with very spotty internet access for almost a day and hence the delay. As I replied to you on twitter , I don't believe in deleting or modifying comments – they are not my words to edit.

    And you talk of using tones of respect to address others and your comment drips of sarcasm and, frankly, superiority. Is that how you define “respect”? Should one only be respectful to someone who is a “leading name in her field”? 🙂

  555. Shripriya says:

    Sanjukta, you are very quick to jump to judgment yourself, aren't you? I was with very spotty internet access for almost a day and hence the delay. As I replied to you on twitter , I don't believe in deleting or modifying comments – they are not my words to edit.

    And you talk of using tones of respect to address others and your comment drips of sarcasm and, frankly, superiority. Is that how you define “respect”? Should one only be respectful to someone who is a “leading name in her field”? 🙂

  556. Shripriya says:

    Sanjukta, you are very quick to jump to judgment yourself, aren't you? I was with very spotty internet access for almost a day and hence the delay. As I replied to you on twitter , I don't believe in deleting or modifying comments – they are not my words to edit.

    And you talk of using tones of respect to address others and your comment drips of sarcasm and, frankly, superiority. Is that how you define “respect”? Should one only be respectful to someone who is a “leading name in her field”? 🙂

  557. Shripriya says:

    Sanjukta, you are very quick to jump to judgment yourself, aren't you? I was with very spotty internet access for almost a day and hence the delay. As I replied to you on twitter , I don't believe in deleting or modifying comments – they are not my words to edit.

    And you talk of using tones of respect to address others and your comment drips of sarcasm and, frankly, superiority. Is that how you define “respect”? Should one only be respectful to someone who is a “leading name in her field”? 🙂

  558. Shripriya says:

    Tareque, I think you want to reach NDTV – please feel free to do so on their website. Good luck with it.

  559. Shripriya says:

    Tareque, I think you want to reach NDTV – please feel free to do so on their website. Good luck with it.

  560. Shripriya says:

    Tareque, I think you want to reach NDTV – please feel free to do so on their website. Good luck with it.

  561. Shripriya says:

    Tareque, I think you want to reach NDTV – please feel free to do so on their website. Good luck with it.

  562. Shripriya says:

    Tareque, I think you want to reach NDTV – please feel free to do so on their website. Good luck with it.

  563. Shripriya says:

    Tareque, I think you want to reach NDTV – please feel free to do so on their website. Good luck with it.

  564. Shripriya says:

    Tareque, I think you want to reach NDTV – please feel free to do so on their website. Good luck with it.

  565. Shripriya says:

    Tareque, I think you want to reach NDTV – please feel free to do so on their website. Good luck with it.

  566. Shripriya says:

    Tareque, I think you want to reach NDTV – please feel free to do so on their website. Good luck with it.

  567. Shripriya says:

    Tareque, I think you want to reach NDTV – please feel free to do so on their website. Good luck with it.

  568. Shripriya says:

    Pradeep – precisely!!! The insistence on an apology (which, apparently the army person who criticized her refused to offer) has increased the scope to a whole new level.

  569. Shripriya says:

    Pradeep – precisely!!! The insistence on an apology (which, apparently the army person who criticized her refused to offer) has increased the scope to a whole new level.

  570. Shripriya says:

    Pradeep – precisely!!! The insistence on an apology (which, apparently the army person who criticized her refused to offer) has increased the scope to a whole new level.

  571. Shripriya says:

    Pradeep – precisely!!! The insistence on an apology (which, apparently the army person who criticized her refused to offer) has increased the scope to a whole new level.

  572. Shripriya says:

    Pradeep – precisely!!! The insistence on an apology (which, apparently the army person who criticized her refused to offer) has increased the scope to a whole new level.

  573. Shripriya says:

    Pradeep – precisely!!! The insistence on an apology (which, apparently the army person who criticized her refused to offer) has increased the scope to a whole new level.

  574. Shripriya says:

    Pradeep – precisely!!! The insistence on an apology (which, apparently the army person who criticized her refused to offer) has increased the scope to a whole new level.

  575. Shripriya says:

    Pradeep – precisely!!! The insistence on an apology (which, apparently the army person who criticized her refused to offer) has increased the scope to a whole new level.

  576. Shripriya says:

    Pradeep – precisely!!! The insistence on an apology (which, apparently the army person who criticized her refused to offer) has increased the scope to a whole new level.

  577. Shripriya says:

    Pradeep – precisely!!! The insistence on an apology (which, apparently the army person who criticized her refused to offer) has increased the scope to a whole new level.

  578. Shripriya says:

    Let's see what he said, I quote

    “Update: In fact, I am willing to believe that Hemant Karkare died because these channels showed him prepare (wear helmet, wear bullet-proof vest.) in excruciating detail live on television. And they in turn targeted him where he was unprotected. The brave officer succumbed to bullets in the neck.”

    He did not name her or NDTV. He expressed his opinion that all the channels who showed this were out of bounds. I'm betting this is not why he was sued.

    He also said, I quote –
    “One of the criticisms about Barkha Dutt on Wikipedia reads thus:

    During the Kargil conflict, Indian Army sources repeatedly complained to her channel that she was giving away locations in her broadcasts, thus causing Indian casualties.”

    This is why he was likely sued. He quoted wikipedia, but he still implied that her irresponsibility was leading to casualties. I wonder why they don't change the wikipedia page? Or sue the author who put it in? Because those are much harder. And I bet you that Wikipedia contributors can be tracked – at least down to the IP which is all the RIAA needed when it sued people…

  579. Shripriya says:

    Let's see what he said, I quote

    “Update: In fact, I am willing to believe that Hemant Karkare died because these channels showed him prepare (wear helmet, wear bullet-proof vest.) in excruciating detail live on television. And they in turn targeted him where he was unprotected. The brave officer succumbed to bullets in the neck.”

    He did not name her or NDTV. He expressed his opinion that all the channels who showed this were out of bounds. I'm betting this is not why he was sued.

    He also said, I quote –
    “One of the criticisms about Barkha Dutt on Wikipedia reads thus:

    During the Kargil conflict, Indian Army sources repeatedly complained to her channel that she was giving away locations in her broadcasts, thus causing Indian casualties.”

    This is why he was likely sued. He quoted wikipedia, but he still implied that her irresponsibility was leading to casualties. I wonder why they don't change the wikipedia page? Or sue the author who put it in? Because those are much harder. And I bet you that Wikipedia contributors can be tracked – at least down to the IP which is all the RIAA needed when it sued people…

  580. Shripriya says:

    Let's see what he said, I quote

    “Update: In fact, I am willing to believe that Hemant Karkare died because these channels showed him prepare (wear helmet, wear bullet-proof vest.) in excruciating detail live on television. And they in turn targeted him where he was unprotected. The brave officer succumbed to bullets in the neck.”

    He did not name her or NDTV. He expressed his opinion that all the channels who showed this were out of bounds. I'm betting this is not why he was sued.

    He also said, I quote –
    “One of the criticisms about Barkha Dutt on Wikipedia reads thus:

    During the Kargil conflict, Indian Army sources repeatedly complained to her channel that she was giving away locations in her broadcasts, thus causing Indian casualties.”

    This is why he was likely sued. He quoted wikipedia, but he still implied that her irresponsibility was leading to casualties. I wonder why they don't change the wikipedia page? Or sue the author who put it in? Because those are much harder. And I bet you that Wikipedia contributors can be tracked – at least down to the IP which is all the RIAA needed when it sued people…

  581. Shripriya says:

    Let's see what he said, I quote

    “Update: In fact, I am willing to believe that Hemant Karkare died because these channels showed him prepare (wear helmet, wear bullet-proof vest.) in excruciating detail live on television. And they in turn targeted him where he was unprotected. The brave officer succumbed to bullets in the neck.”

    He did not name her or NDTV. He expressed his opinion that all the channels who showed this were out of bounds. I'm betting this is not why he was sued.

    He also said, I quote –
    “One of the criticisms about Barkha Dutt on Wikipedia reads thus:

    During the Kargil conflict, Indian Army sources repeatedly complained to her channel that she was giving away locations in her broadcasts, thus causing Indian casualties.”

    This is why he was likely sued. He quoted wikipedia, but he still implied that her irresponsibility was leading to casualties. I wonder why they don't change the wikipedia page? Or sue the author who put it in? Because those are much harder. And I bet you that Wikipedia contributors can be tracked – at least down to the IP which is all the RIAA needed when it sued people…

  582. Shripriya says:

    Let's see what he said, I quote

    “Update: In fact, I am willing to believe that Hemant Karkare died because these channels showed him prepare (wear helmet, wear bullet-proof vest.) in excruciating detail live on television. And they in turn targeted him where he was unprotected. The brave officer succumbed to bullets in the neck.”

    He did not name her or NDTV. He expressed his opinion that all the channels who showed this were out of bounds. I'm betting this is not why he was sued.

    He also said, I quote –
    “One of the criticisms about Barkha Dutt on Wikipedia reads thus:

    During the Kargil conflict, Indian Army sources repeatedly complained to her channel that she was giving away locations in her broadcasts, thus causing Indian casualties.”

    This is why he was likely sued. He quoted wikipedia, but he still implied that her irresponsibility was leading to casualties. I wonder why they don't change the wikipedia page? Or sue the author who put it in? Because those are much harder. And I bet you that Wikipedia contributors can be tracked – at least down to the IP which is all the RIAA needed when it sued people…

  583. Shripriya says:

    Let's see what he said, I quote

    “Update: In fact, I am willing to believe that Hemant Karkare died because these channels showed him prepare (wear helmet, wear bullet-proof vest.) in excruciating detail live on television. And they in turn targeted him where he was unprotected. The brave officer succumbed to bullets in the neck.”

    He did not name her or NDTV. He expressed his opinion that all the channels who showed this were out of bounds. I'm betting this is not why he was sued.

    He also said, I quote –
    “One of the criticisms about Barkha Dutt on Wikipedia reads thus:

    During the Kargil conflict, Indian Army sources repeatedly complained to her channel that she was giving away locations in her broadcasts, thus causing Indian casualties.”

    This is why he was likely sued. He quoted wikipedia, but he still implied that her irresponsibility was leading to casualties. I wonder why they don't change the wikipedia page? Or sue the author who put it in? Because those are much harder. And I bet you that Wikipedia contributors can be tracked – at least down to the IP which is all the RIAA needed when it sued people…

  584. Shripriya says:

    Let's see what he said, I quote

    “Update: In fact, I am willing to believe that Hemant Karkare died because these channels showed him prepare (wear helmet, wear bullet-proof vest.) in excruciating detail live on television. And they in turn targeted him where he was unprotected. The brave officer succumbed to bullets in the neck.”

    He did not name her or NDTV. He expressed his opinion that all the channels who showed this were out of bounds. I'm betting this is not why he was sued.

    He also said, I quote –
    “One of the criticisms about Barkha Dutt on Wikipedia reads thus:

    During the Kargil conflict, Indian Army sources repeatedly complained to her channel that she was giving away locations in her broadcasts, thus causing Indian casualties.”

    This is why he was likely sued. He quoted wikipedia, but he still implied that her irresponsibility was leading to casualties. I wonder why they don't change the wikipedia page? Or sue the author who put it in? Because those are much harder. And I bet you that Wikipedia contributors can be tracked – at least down to the IP which is all the RIAA needed when it sued people…

  585. Shripriya says:

    Let's see what he said, I quote

    “Update: In fact, I am willing to believe that Hemant Karkare died because these channels showed him prepare (wear helmet, wear bullet-proof vest.) in excruciating detail live on television. And they in turn targeted him where he was unprotected. The brave officer succumbed to bullets in the neck.”

    He did not name her or NDTV. He expressed his opinion that all the channels who showed this were out of bounds. I'm betting this is not why he was sued.

    He also said, I quote –
    “One of the criticisms about Barkha Dutt on Wikipedia reads thus:

    During the Kargil conflict, Indian Army sources repeatedly complained to her channel that she was giving away locations in her broadcasts, thus causing Indian casualties.”

    This is why he was likely sued. He quoted wikipedia, but he still implied that her irresponsibility was leading to casualties. I wonder why they don't change the wikipedia page? Or sue the author who put it in? Because those are much harder. And I bet you that Wikipedia contributors can be tracked – at least down to the IP which is all the RIAA needed when it sued people…

  586. Shripriya says:

    Let's see what he said, I quote

    “Update: In fact, I am willing to believe that Hemant Karkare died because these channels showed him prepare (wear helmet, wear bullet-proof vest.) in excruciating detail live on television. And they in turn targeted him where he was unprotected. The brave officer succumbed to bullets in the neck.”

    He did not name her or NDTV. He expressed his opinion that all the channels who showed this were out of bounds. I'm betting this is not why he was sued.

    He also said, I quote –
    “One of the criticisms about Barkha Dutt on Wikipedia reads thus:

    During the Kargil conflict, Indian Army sources repeatedly complained to her channel that she was giving away locations in her broadcasts, thus causing Indian casualties.”

    This is why he was likely sued. He quoted wikipedia, but he still implied that her irresponsibility was leading to casualties. I wonder why they don't change the wikipedia page? Or sue the author who put it in? Because those are much harder. And I bet you that Wikipedia contributors can be tracked – at least down to the IP which is all the RIAA needed when it sued people…

  587. Shripriya says:

    Let's see what he said, I quote

    “Update: In fact, I am willing to believe that Hemant Karkare died because these channels showed him prepare (wear helmet, wear bullet-proof vest.) in excruciating detail live on television. And they in turn targeted him where he was unprotected. The brave officer succumbed to bullets in the neck.”

    He did not name her or NDTV. He expressed his opinion that all the channels who showed this were out of bounds. I'm betting this is not why he was sued.

    He also said, I quote –
    “One of the criticisms about Barkha Dutt on Wikipedia reads thus:

    During the Kargil conflict, Indian Army sources repeatedly complained to her channel that she was giving away locations in her broadcasts, thus causing Indian casualties.”

    This is why he was likely sued. He quoted wikipedia, but he still implied that her irresponsibility was leading to casualties. I wonder why they don't change the wikipedia page? Or sue the author who put it in? Because those are much harder. And I bet you that Wikipedia contributors can be tracked – at least down to the IP which is all the RIAA needed when it sued people…

  588. I think we have ranted unecessarily about #ndtv and #ckunte without knowing the true facts. These are perils of using #twitter. Not that we are wrong in our intention, but unfortunately we have promoted ndtv a lot. They got free publicity at the cost of our bandwidth…!

    Besides, this incident also showed some sadist bloggers ranting desperately to increase their blog traffic. We need to mark their blogs as spam.

  589. I think we have ranted unecessarily about #ndtv and #ckunte without knowing the true facts. These are perils of using #twitter. Not that we are wrong in our intention, but unfortunately we have promoted ndtv a lot. They got free publicity at the cost of our bandwidth…!

    Besides, this incident also showed some sadist bloggers ranting desperately to increase their blog traffic. We need to mark their blogs as spam.

  590. I think we have ranted unecessarily about #ndtv and #ckunte without knowing the true facts. These are perils of using #twitter. Not that we are wrong in our intention, but unfortunately we have promoted ndtv a lot. They got free publicity at the cost of our bandwidth…!

    Besides, this incident also showed some sadist bloggers ranting desperately to increase their blog traffic. We need to mark their blogs as spam.

  591. I think we have ranted unecessarily about #ndtv and #ckunte without knowing the true facts. These are perils of using #twitter. Not that we are wrong in our intention, but unfortunately we have promoted ndtv a lot. They got free publicity at the cost of our bandwidth…!

    Besides, this incident also showed some sadist bloggers ranting desperately to increase their blog traffic. We need to mark their blogs as spam.

  592. I think we have ranted unecessarily about #ndtv and #ckunte without knowing the true facts. These are perils of using #twitter. Not that we are wrong in our intention, but unfortunately we have promoted ndtv a lot. They got free publicity at the cost of our bandwidth…!

    Besides, this incident also showed some sadist bloggers ranting desperately to increase their blog traffic. We need to mark their blogs as spam.

  593. I think we have ranted unecessarily about #ndtv and #ckunte without knowing the true facts. These are perils of using #twitter. Not that we are wrong in our intention, but unfortunately we have promoted ndtv a lot. They got free publicity at the cost of our bandwidth…!

    Besides, this incident also showed some sadist bloggers ranting desperately to increase their blog traffic. We need to mark their blogs as spam.

  594. I think we have ranted unecessarily about #ndtv and #ckunte without knowing the true facts. These are perils of using #twitter. Not that we are wrong in our intention, but unfortunately we have promoted ndtv a lot. They got free publicity at the cost of our bandwidth…!

    Besides, this incident also showed some sadist bloggers ranting desperately to increase their blog traffic. We need to mark their blogs as spam.

  595. I think we have ranted unecessarily about #ndtv and #ckunte without knowing the true facts. These are perils of using #twitter. Not that we are wrong in our intention, but unfortunately we have promoted ndtv a lot. They got free publicity at the cost of our bandwidth…!

    Besides, this incident also showed some sadist bloggers ranting desperately to increase their blog traffic. We need to mark their blogs as spam.

  596. I think we have ranted unecessarily about #ndtv and #ckunte without knowing the true facts. These are perils of using #twitter. Not that we are wrong in our intention, but unfortunately we have promoted ndtv a lot. They got free publicity at the cost of our bandwidth…!

    Besides, this incident also showed some sadist bloggers ranting desperately to increase their blog traffic. We need to mark their blogs as spam.

  597. I think we have ranted unecessarily about #ndtv and #ckunte without knowing the true facts. These are perils of using #twitter. Not that we are wrong in our intention, but unfortunately we have promoted ndtv a lot. They got free publicity at the cost of our bandwidth…!

    Besides, this incident also showed some sadist bloggers ranting desperately to increase their blog traffic. We need to mark their blogs as spam.

  598. Shripriya says:

    I love your haikus! 🙂

    But believe me, the fact that I blogged this early was purely chance. Thanks in large part to Retributions. If you peruse my blog you'll see I rarely opine on the controversy du jour… But the Retributions blog is a great source for current info and his point of view is one I usually agree with.

  599. Shripriya says:

    I love this haiku! 🙂

    But believe me, the fact that I blogged this early was purely chance. Thanks in large part to Retributions. If you peruse my blog you'll see I rarely opine on the controversy du jour… But the Retributions blog is a great source for current info and his point of view is one I usually agree with.

  600. Shripriya says:

    I love this haiku! 🙂

    But believe me, the fact that I blogged this early was purely chance. Thanks in large part to Retributions. If you peruse my blog you'll see I rarely opine on the controversy du jour… But the Retributions blog is a great source for current info and his point of view is one I usually agree with.

  601. Shripriya says:

    I love this haiku! 🙂

    But believe me, the fact that I blogged this early was purely chance. Thanks in large part to Retributions. If you peruse my blog you'll see I rarely opine on the controversy du jour… But the Retributions blog is a great source for current info and his point of view is one I usually agree with.

  602. Shripriya says:

    I love this haiku! 🙂

    But believe me, the fact that I blogged this early was purely chance. Thanks in large part to Retributions. If you peruse my blog you'll see I rarely opine on the controversy du jour… But the Retributions blog is a great source for current info and his point of view is one I usually agree with.

  603. Shripriya says:

    I love this haiku! 🙂

    But believe me, the fact that I blogged this early was purely chance. Thanks in large part to Retributions. If you peruse my blog you'll see I rarely opine on the controversy du jour… But the Retributions blog is a great source for current info and his point of view is one I usually agree with.

  604. Shripriya says:

    I love this haiku! 🙂

    But believe me, the fact that I blogged this early was purely chance. Thanks in large part to Retributions. If you peruse my blog you'll see I rarely opine on the controversy du jour… But the Retributions blog is a great source for current info and his point of view is one I usually agree with.

  605. Shripriya says:

    I love this haiku! 🙂

    But believe me, the fact that I blogged this early was purely chance. Thanks in large part to Retributions. If you peruse my blog you'll see I rarely opine on the controversy du jour… But the Retributions blog is a great source for current info and his point of view is one I usually agree with.

  606. Shripriya says:

    I love this haiku! 🙂

    But believe me, the fact that I blogged this early was purely chance. Thanks in large part to Retributions. If you peruse my blog you'll see I rarely opine on the controversy du jour… But the Retributions blog is a great source for current info and his point of view is one I usually agree with.

  607. Shripriya says:

    I love this haiku! 🙂

    But believe me, the fact that I blogged this early was purely chance. Thanks in large part to Retributions. If you peruse my blog you'll see I rarely opine on the controversy du jour… But the Retributions blog is a great source for current info and his point of view is one I usually agree with.

  608. Shripriya says:

    As long we comment without personal attacks, yes, mentality, personality and any “ity” one has control over is open for comment.

  609. Shripriya says:

    As long we comment without personal attacks, yes, mentality, personality and any “ity” one has control over is open for comment.

  610. Shripriya says:

    As long we comment without personal attacks, yes, mentality, personality and any “ity” one has control over is open for comment.

  611. Shripriya says:

    As long we comment without personal attacks, yes, mentality, personality and any “ity” one has control over is open for comment.

  612. Shripriya says:

    As long we comment without personal attacks, yes, mentality, personality and any “ity” one has control over is open for comment.

  613. Shripriya says:

    As long we comment without personal attacks, yes, mentality, personality and any “ity” one has control over is open for comment.

  614. Shripriya says:

    As long we comment without personal attacks, yes, mentality, personality and any “ity” one has control over is open for comment.

  615. Shripriya says:

    As long we comment without personal attacks, yes, mentality, personality and any “ity” one has control over is open for comment.

  616. Shripriya says:

    As long we comment without personal attacks, yes, mentality, personality and any “ity” one has control over is open for comment.

  617. Shripriya says:

    As long we comment without personal attacks, yes, mentality, personality and any “ity” one has control over is open for comment.

  618. Batull says:

    It simply outrageous!!! In a way this is a blessing in disguise because now more people are interested in what CK had to say! I for one am in TOTAL AGREEMENT WITH EVERY WORD….n will ensure the word gets around.How many more of us are they going to shut up?!!
    Barkhaji has forgotten what journalism is all about !

  619. Batull says:

    It simply outrageous!!! In a way this is a blessing in disguise because now more people are interested in what CK had to say! I for one am in TOTAL AGREEMENT WITH EVERY WORD….n will ensure the word gets around.How many more of us are they going to shut up?!!
    Barkhaji has forgotten what journalism is all about !

  620. Batull says:

    It simply outrageous!!! In a way this is a blessing in disguise because now more people are interested in what CK had to say! I for one am in TOTAL AGREEMENT WITH EVERY WORD….n will ensure the word gets around.How many more of us are they going to shut up?!!
    Barkhaji has forgotten what journalism is all about !

  621. Batull says:

    It simply outrageous!!! In a way this is a blessing in disguise because now more people are interested in what CK had to say! I for one am in TOTAL AGREEMENT WITH EVERY WORD….n will ensure the word gets around.How many more of us are they going to shut up?!!
    Barkhaji has forgotten what journalism is all about !

  622. Batull says:

    It simply outrageous!!! In a way this is a blessing in disguise because now more people are interested in what CK had to say! I for one am in TOTAL AGREEMENT WITH EVERY WORD….n will ensure the word gets around.How many more of us are they going to shut up?!!
    Barkhaji has forgotten what journalism is all about !

  623. Batull says:

    It simply outrageous!!! In a way this is a blessing in disguise because now more people are interested in what CK had to say! I for one am in TOTAL AGREEMENT WITH EVERY WORD….n will ensure the word gets around.How many more of us are they going to shut up?!!
    Barkhaji has forgotten what journalism is all about !

  624. Batull says:

    It simply outrageous!!! In a way this is a blessing in disguise because now more people are interested in what CK had to say! I for one am in TOTAL AGREEMENT WITH EVERY WORD….n will ensure the word gets around.How many more of us are they going to shut up?!!
    Barkhaji has forgotten what journalism is all about !

  625. Batull says:

    It simply outrageous!!! In a way this is a blessing in disguise because now more people are interested in what CK had to say! I for one am in TOTAL AGREEMENT WITH EVERY WORD….n will ensure the word gets around.How many more of us are they going to shut up?!!
    Barkhaji has forgotten what journalism is all about !

  626. Batull says:

    It simply outrageous!!! In a way this is a blessing in disguise because now more people are interested in what CK had to say! I for one am in TOTAL AGREEMENT WITH EVERY WORD….n will ensure the word gets around.How many more of us are they going to shut up?!!
    Barkhaji has forgotten what journalism is all about !

  627. Batull says:

    It simply outrageous!!! In a way this is a blessing in disguise because now more people are interested in what CK had to say! I for one am in TOTAL AGREEMENT WITH EVERY WORD….n will ensure the word gets around.How many more of us are they going to shut up?!!
    Barkhaji has forgotten what journalism is all about !

  628. mediahypocrites says:

    i will never look at barkha the same way after this, unfortunately. thats for sure

  629. mediahypocrites says:

    i will never look at barkha the same way after this, unfortunately. thats for sure

  630. mediahypocrites says:

    i will never look at barkha the same way after this, unfortunately. thats for sure

  631. mediahypocrites says:

    i will never look at barkha the same way after this, unfortunately. thats for sure

  632. mediahypocrites says:

    i will never look at barkha the same way after this, unfortunately. thats for sure

  633. mediahypocrites says:

    i will never look at barkha the same way after this, unfortunately. thats for sure

  634. mediahypocrites says:

    i will never look at barkha the same way after this, unfortunately. thats for sure

  635. mediahypocrites says:

    i will never look at barkha the same way after this, unfortunately. thats for sure

  636. mediahypocrites says:

    i will never look at barkha the same way after this, unfortunately. thats for sure

  637. mediahypocrites says:

    i will never look at barkha the same way after this, unfortunately. thats for sure

  638. mediahypocrites says:

    not a blogging fan, aye?

    for all the challenges, add to that now fear of being dragged to courts( for their rights), blogging still has its loyal fans and represents a saner, unbiased landscape than MSM.

    I think Barkha has become a liability for ndtv, not ndtv for barkha. Kunte is a victim of MSM bullying small bloggers. what is there to miss?

  639. mediahypocrites says:

    not a blogging fan, aye?

    for all the challenges, add to that now fear of being dragged to courts( for their rights), blogging still has its loyal fans and represents a saner, unbiased landscape than MSM.

    I think Barkha has become a liability for ndtv, not ndtv for barkha. Kunte is a victim of MSM bullying small bloggers. what is there to miss?

  640. mediahypocrites says:

    not a blogging fan, aye?

    for all the challenges, add to that now fear of being dragged to courts( for their rights), blogging still has its loyal fans and represents a saner, unbiased landscape than MSM.

    I think Barkha has become a liability for ndtv, not ndtv for barkha. Kunte is a victim of MSM bullying small bloggers. what is there to miss?

  641. mediahypocrites says:

    not a blogging fan, aye?

    for all the challenges, add to that now fear of being dragged to courts( for their rights), blogging still has its loyal fans and represents a saner, unbiased landscape than MSM.

    I think Barkha has become a liability for ndtv, not ndtv for barkha. Kunte is a victim of MSM bullying small bloggers. what is there to miss?

  642. mediahypocrites says:

    not a blogging fan, aye?

    for all the challenges, add to that now fear of being dragged to courts( for their rights), blogging still has its loyal fans and represents a saner, unbiased landscape than MSM.

    I think Barkha has become a liability for ndtv, not ndtv for barkha. Kunte is a victim of MSM bullying small bloggers. what is there to miss?

  643. mediahypocrites says:

    not a blogging fan, aye?

    for all the challenges, add to that now fear of being dragged to courts( for their rights), blogging still has its loyal fans and represents a saner, unbiased landscape than MSM.

    I think Barkha has become a liability for ndtv, not ndtv for barkha. Kunte is a victim of MSM bullying small bloggers. what is there to miss?

  644. mediahypocrites says:

    not a blogging fan, aye?

    for all the challenges, add to that now fear of being dragged to courts( for their rights), blogging still has its loyal fans and represents a saner, unbiased landscape than MSM.

    I think Barkha has become a liability for ndtv, not ndtv for barkha. Kunte is a victim of MSM bullying small bloggers. what is there to miss?

  645. mediahypocrites says:

    not a blogging fan, aye?

    for all the challenges, add to that now fear of being dragged to courts( for their rights), blogging still has its loyal fans and represents a saner, unbiased landscape than MSM.

    I think Barkha has become a liability for ndtv, not ndtv for barkha. Kunte is a victim of MSM bullying small bloggers. what is there to miss?

  646. mediahypocrites says:

    not a blogging fan, aye?

    for all the challenges, add to that now fear of being dragged to courts( for their rights), blogging still has its loyal fans and represents a saner, unbiased landscape than MSM.

    I think Barkha has become a liability for ndtv, not ndtv for barkha. Kunte is a victim of MSM bullying small bloggers. what is there to miss?

  647. mediahypocrites says:

    not a blogging fan, aye?

    for all the challenges, add to that now fear of being dragged to courts( for their rights), blogging still has its loyal fans and represents a saner, unbiased landscape than MSM.

    I think Barkha has become a liability for ndtv, not ndtv for barkha. Kunte is a victim of MSM bullying small bloggers. what is there to miss?

  648. mediahypocrites says:

    hehe!

  649. mediahypocrites says:

    hehe!

  650. mediahypocrites says:

    hehe!

  651. mediahypocrites says:

    hehe!

  652. mediahypocrites says:

    hehe!

  653. mediahypocrites says:

    hehe!

  654. mediahypocrites says:

    hehe!

  655. mediahypocrites says:

    hehe!

  656. mediahypocrites says:

    hehe!

  657. mediahypocrites says:

    hehe!

  658. mediahypocrites says:

    exactly.

  659. mediahypocrites says:

    exactly.

  660. mediahypocrites says:

    exactly.

  661. mediahypocrites says:

    exactly.

  662. mediahypocrites says:

    exactly.

  663. mediahypocrites says:

    exactly.

  664. mediahypocrites says:

    exactly.

  665. mediahypocrites says:

    exactly.

  666. mediahypocrites says:

    exactly.

  667. mediahypocrites says:

    exactly.

  668. mediahypocrites says:

    you must be feeling let down now. feel sad for you.

  669. mediahypocrites says:

    you must be feeling let down now. feel sad for you.

  670. mediahypocrites says:

    you must be feeling let down now. feel sad for you.

  671. mediahypocrites says:

    you must be feeling let down now. feel sad for you.

  672. mediahypocrites says:

    you must be feeling let down now. feel sad for you.

  673. mediahypocrites says:

    you must be feeling let down now. feel sad for you.

  674. mediahypocrites says:

    you must be feeling let down now. feel sad for you.

  675. mediahypocrites says:

    you must be feeling let down now. feel sad for you.

  676. mediahypocrites says:

    you must be feeling let down now. feel sad for you.

  677. mediahypocrites says:

    you must be feeling let down now. feel sad for you.

  678. Kenji katsumoto says:

    Ha! another attempt of media control… :D..in the wrong sense…

  679. Kenji katsumoto says:

    Ha! another attempt of media control… :D..in the wrong sense…

  680. Kenji katsumoto says:

    Ha! another attempt of media control… :D..in the wrong sense…

  681. Kenji katsumoto says:

    Ha! another attempt of media control… :D..in the wrong sense…

  682. Kenji katsumoto says:

    Ha! another attempt of media control… :D..in the wrong sense…

  683. Kenji katsumoto says:

    Ha! another attempt of media control… :D..in the wrong sense…

  684. Kenji katsumoto says:

    Ha! another attempt of media control… :D..in the wrong sense…

  685. Kenji katsumoto says:

    Ha! another attempt of media control… :D..in the wrong sense…

  686. Kenji katsumoto says:

    Ha! another attempt of media control… :D..in the wrong sense…

  687. Kenji katsumoto says:

    Ha! another attempt of media control… :D..in the wrong sense…

  688. Smoke on fire says:

    Sanjukta, how does the term fucking idiot sound ? you seem to take yourself far too seriously and this my dear, is the freedom of speech talking. You can state your views as and how you see them, you dont need to be dripping of sarcasm. I hope you get the drift 🙂

  689. Smoke on fire says:

    Sanjukta, how does the term fucking idiot sound ? you seem to take yourself far too seriously and this my dear, is the freedom of speech talking. You can state your views as and how you see them, you dont need to be dripping of sarcasm. I hope you get the drift 🙂

  690. Smoke on fire says:

    Sanjukta, how does the term fucking idiot sound ? you seem to take yourself far too seriously and this my dear, is the freedom of speech talking. You can state your views as and how you see them, you dont need to be dripping of sarcasm. I hope you get the drift 🙂

  691. Smoke on fire says:

    Sanjukta, how does the term fucking idiot sound ? you seem to take yourself far too seriously and this my dear, is the freedom of speech talking. You can state your views as and how you see them, you dont need to be dripping of sarcasm. I hope you get the drift 🙂

  692. Smoke on fire says:

    Sanjukta, how does the term fucking idiot sound ? you seem to take yourself far too seriously and this my dear, is the freedom of speech talking. You can state your views as and how you see them, you dont need to be dripping of sarcasm. I hope you get the drift 🙂

  693. Smoke on fire says:

    Sanjukta, how does the term fucking idiot sound ? you seem to take yourself far too seriously and this my dear, is the freedom of speech talking. You can state your views as and how you see them, you dont need to be dripping of sarcasm. I hope you get the drift 🙂

  694. Smoke on fire says:

    Sanjukta, how does the term fucking idiot sound ? you seem to take yourself far too seriously and this my dear, is the freedom of speech talking. You can state your views as and how you see them, you dont need to be dripping of sarcasm. I hope you get the drift 🙂

  695. Smoke on fire says:

    Sanjukta, how does the term fucking idiot sound ? you seem to take yourself far too seriously and this my dear, is the freedom of speech talking. You can state your views as and how you see them, you dont need to be dripping of sarcasm. I hope you get the drift 🙂

  696. Smoke on fire says:

    Sanjukta, how does the term fucking idiot sound ? you seem to take yourself far too seriously and this my dear, is the freedom of speech talking. You can state your views as and how you see them, you dont need to be dripping of sarcasm. I hope you get the drift 🙂

  697. Smoke on fire says:

    Sanjukta, how does the term fucking idiot sound ? you seem to take yourself far too seriously and this my dear, is the freedom of speech talking. You can state your views as and how you see them, you dont need to be dripping of sarcasm. I hope you get the drift 🙂

  698. Rahul says:

    she should be banned!

  699. Rahul says:

    she should be banned!

  700. Rahul says:

    she should be banned!

  701. Rahul says:

    she should be banned!

  702. Rahul says:

    she should be banned!

  703. Rahul says:

    she should be banned!

  704. Rahul says:

    she should be banned!

  705. Rahul says:

    she should be banned!

  706. Rahul says:

    she should be banned!

  707. Rahul says:

    she should be banned!

  708. Shripriya says:

    Please refrain from making personal comments/attacks. Thank you very much.

  709. Shripriya says:

    Please refrain from making personal comments/attacks. Thank you very much.

  710. Shripriya says:

    Please refrain from making personal comments/attacks. Thank you very much.

  711. Shripriya says:

    Please refrain from making personal comments/attacks. Thank you very much.

  712. Shripriya says:

    Please refrain from making personal comments/attacks. Thank you very much.

  713. Shripriya says:

    Please refrain from making personal comments/attacks. Thank you very much.

  714. Shripriya says:

    Please refrain from making personal comments/attacks. Thank you very much.

  715. Shripriya says:

    Please refrain from making personal comments/attacks. Thank you very much.

  716. Shripriya says:

    Please refrain from making personal comments/attacks. Thank you very much.

  717. Shripriya says:

    Please refrain from making personal comments/attacks. Thank you very much.

  718. Rational_Human says:

    Everyone's entitled to their opinion. This must be a bedrock principle. Otherwise, this blog wouldn't exist. Neither would idiotic posts by sanjukta.
    Sanjukta, since you claim that calling someone an idiot is a legal offense, would you please go by a school playground and sue all the children there?
    Kunte expressed an opinion, not a statement deposed under oath, that he believed that Ms. Dutt's actions endangered lives and that this was unethical. Shocking!
    Ms. Dutt'options are (1) Ignore the post (2) Post her own reply (3) Write another blog or use the air waves. Instead she attempts to stifle opinion, thought, and dissent- actions of a tyrant! Shame, Ms. Dutt, shame…

  719. Rational_Human says:

    Everyone's entitled to their opinion. This must be a bedrock principle. Otherwise, this blog wouldn't exist. Neither would idiotic posts by sanjukta.
    Sanjukta, since you claim that calling someone an idiot is a legal offense, would you please go by a school playground and sue all the children there?
    Kunte expressed an opinion, not a statement deposed under oath, that he believed that Ms. Dutt's actions endangered lives and that this was unethical. Shocking!
    Ms. Dutt'options are (1) Ignore the post (2) Post her own reply (3) Write another blog or use the air waves. Instead she attempts to stifle opinion, thought, and dissent- actions of a tyrant! Shame, Ms. Dutt, shame…

  720. Rational_Human says:

    Everyone's entitled to their opinion. This must be a bedrock principle. Otherwise, this blog wouldn't exist. Neither would idiotic posts by sanjukta.
    Sanjukta, since you claim that calling someone an idiot is a legal offense, would you please go by a school playground and sue all the children there?
    Kunte expressed an opinion, not a statement deposed under oath, that he believed that Ms. Dutt's actions endangered lives and that this was unethical. Shocking!
    Ms. Dutt'options are (1) Ignore the post (2) Post her own reply (3) Write another blog or use the air waves. Instead she attempts to stifle opinion, thought, and dissent- actions of a tyrant! Shame, Ms. Dutt, shame…

  721. Rational_Human says:

    Everyone's entitled to their opinion. This must be a bedrock principle. Otherwise, this blog wouldn't exist. Neither would idiotic posts by sanjukta.
    Sanjukta, since you claim that calling someone an idiot is a legal offense, would you please go by a school playground and sue all the children there?
    Kunte expressed an opinion, not a statement deposed under oath, that he believed that Ms. Dutt's actions endangered lives and that this was unethical. Shocking!
    Ms. Dutt'options are (1) Ignore the post (2) Post her own reply (3) Write another blog or use the air waves. Instead she attempts to stifle opinion, thought, and dissent- actions of a tyrant! Shame, Ms. Dutt, shame…

  722. Rational_Human says:

    Everyone's entitled to their opinion. This must be a bedrock principle. Otherwise, this blog wouldn't exist. Neither would idiotic posts by sanjukta.
    Sanjukta, since you claim that calling someone an idiot is a legal offense, would you please go by a school playground and sue all the children there?
    Kunte expressed an opinion, not a statement deposed under oath, that he believed that Ms. Dutt's actions endangered lives and that this was unethical. Shocking!
    Ms. Dutt'options are (1) Ignore the post (2) Post her own reply (3) Write another blog or use the air waves. Instead she attempts to stifle opinion, thought, and dissent- actions of a tyrant! Shame, Ms. Dutt, shame…

  723. Rational_Human says:

    Everyone's entitled to their opinion. This must be a bedrock principle. Otherwise, this blog wouldn't exist. Neither would idiotic posts by sanjukta.
    Sanjukta, since you claim that calling someone an idiot is a legal offense, would you please go by a school playground and sue all the children there?
    Kunte expressed an opinion, not a statement deposed under oath, that he believed that Ms. Dutt's actions endangered lives and that this was unethical. Shocking!
    Ms. Dutt'options are (1) Ignore the post (2) Post her own reply (3) Write another blog or use the air waves. Instead she attempts to stifle opinion, thought, and dissent- actions of a tyrant! Shame, Ms. Dutt, shame…

  724. Rational_Human says:

    Everyone's entitled to their opinion. This must be a bedrock principle. Otherwise, this blog wouldn't exist. Neither would idiotic posts by sanjukta.
    Sanjukta, since you claim that calling someone an idiot is a legal offense, would you please go by a school playground and sue all the children there?
    Kunte expressed an opinion, not a statement deposed under oath, that he believed that Ms. Dutt's actions endangered lives and that this was unethical. Shocking!
    Ms. Dutt'options are (1) Ignore the post (2) Post her own reply (3) Write another blog or use the air waves. Instead she attempts to stifle opinion, thought, and dissent- actions of a tyrant! Shame, Ms. Dutt, shame…

  725. Rational_Human says:

    Everyone's entitled to their opinion. This must be a bedrock principle. Otherwise, this blog wouldn't exist. Neither would idiotic posts by sanjukta.
    Sanjukta, since you claim that calling someone an idiot is a legal offense, would you please go by a school playground and sue all the children there?
    Kunte expressed an opinion, not a statement deposed under oath, that he believed that Ms. Dutt's actions endangered lives and that this was unethical. Shocking!
    Ms. Dutt'options are (1) Ignore the post (2) Post her own reply (3) Write another blog or use the air waves. Instead she attempts to stifle opinion, thought, and dissent- actions of a tyrant! Shame, Ms. Dutt, shame…

  726. Rational_Human says:

    Everyone's entitled to their opinion. This must be a bedrock principle. Otherwise, this blog wouldn't exist. Neither would idiotic posts by sanjukta.
    Sanjukta, since you claim that calling someone an idiot is a legal offense, would you please go by a school playground and sue all the children there?
    Kunte expressed an opinion, not a statement deposed under oath, that he believed that Ms. Dutt's actions endangered lives and that this was unethical. Shocking!
    Ms. Dutt'options are (1) Ignore the post (2) Post her own reply (3) Write another blog or use the air waves. Instead she attempts to stifle opinion, thought, and dissent- actions of a tyrant! Shame, Ms. Dutt, shame…

  727. Rational_Human says:

    Everyone's entitled to their opinion. This must be a bedrock principle. Otherwise, this blog wouldn't exist. Neither would idiotic posts by sanjukta.
    Sanjukta, since you claim that calling someone an idiot is a legal offense, would you please go by a school playground and sue all the children there?
    Kunte expressed an opinion, not a statement deposed under oath, that he believed that Ms. Dutt's actions endangered lives and that this was unethical. Shocking!
    Ms. Dutt'options are (1) Ignore the post (2) Post her own reply (3) Write another blog or use the air waves. Instead she attempts to stifle opinion, thought, and dissent- actions of a tyrant! Shame, Ms. Dutt, shame…

  728. Jokingly Serious says:

    Were the comments too bad or the anonymity?

  729. Jokingly Serious says:

    Were the comments too bad or the anonymity?

  730. Jokingly Serious says:

    Were the comments too bad or the anonymity?

  731. Jokingly Serious says:

    Were the comments too bad or the anonymity?

  732. Jokingly Serious says:

    Were the comments too bad or the anonymity?

  733. Jokingly Serious says:

    Were the comments too bad or the anonymity?

  734. Jokingly Serious says:

    Were the comments too bad or the anonymity?

  735. Jokingly Serious says:

    Were the comments too bad or the anonymity?

  736. Jokingly Serious says:

    Were the comments too bad or the anonymity?

  737. Sid says:

    I want to sue Barkha Dutt for bad haircut and dressing sense and for not using deodorent.
    I will go ahead and add these things to her wiki entry.

  738. Sid says:

    I want to sue Barkha Dutt for bad haircut and dressing sense and for not using deodorent.
    I will go ahead and add these things to her wiki entry.

  739. Sid says:

    I want to sue Barkha Dutt for bad haircut and dressing sense and for not using deodorent.
    I will go ahead and add these things to her wiki entry.

  740. Sid says:

    I want to sue Barkha Dutt for bad haircut and dressing sense and for not using deodorent.
    I will go ahead and add these things to her wiki entry.

  741. Sid says:

    I want to sue Barkha Dutt for bad haircut and dressing sense and for not using deodorent.
    I will go ahead and add these things to her wiki entry.

  742. Sid says:

    I want to sue Barkha Dutt for bad haircut and dressing sense and for not using deodorent.
    I will go ahead and add these things to her wiki entry.

  743. Sid says:

    I want to sue Barkha Dutt for bad haircut and dressing sense and for not using deodorent.
    I will go ahead and add these things to her wiki entry.

  744. Sid says:

    I want to sue Barkha Dutt for bad haircut and dressing sense and for not using deodorent.
    I will go ahead and add these things to her wiki entry.

  745. Sid says:

    I want to sue Barkha Dutt for bad haircut and dressing sense and for not using deodorent.
    I will go ahead and add these things to her wiki entry.

  746. Sid says:

    I want to sue Barkha Dutt for bad haircut and dressing sense and for not using deodorent.
    I will go ahead and add these things to her wiki entry.

  747. Raja Durai says:

    NDTV run by coward communists will do anything, the so called media they assume that they can have more power than god with media, they will soon meet their rival

  748. Raja Durai says:

    NDTV run by coward communists will do anything, the so called media they assume that they can have more power than god with media, they will soon meet their rival

  749. Raja Durai says:

    NDTV run by coward communists will do anything, the so called media they assume that they can have more power than god with media, they will soon meet their rival

  750. Raja Durai says:

    NDTV run by coward communists will do anything, the so called media they assume that they can have more power than god with media, they will soon meet their rival

  751. Raja Durai says:

    NDTV run by coward communists will do anything, the so called media they assume that they can have more power than god with media, they will soon meet their rival

  752. Raja Durai says:

    NDTV run by coward communists will do anything, the so called media they assume that they can have more power than god with media, they will soon meet their rival

  753. Raja Durai says:

    NDTV run by coward communists will do anything, the so called media they assume that they can have more power than god with media, they will soon meet their rival

  754. Raja Durai says:

    NDTV run by coward communists will do anything, the so called media they assume that they can have more power than god with media, they will soon meet their rival

  755. Raja Durai says:

    NDTV run by coward communists will do anything, the so called media they assume that they can have more power than god with media, they will soon meet their rival

  756. Raja Durai says:

    NDTV run by coward communists will do anything, the so called media they assume that they can have more power than god with media, they will soon meet their rival

  757. Vishnu says:

    Burkha Dutt is pathetic!

  758. Vishnu says:

    Burkha Dutt is pathetic!

  759. Vishnu says:

    Burkha Dutt is pathetic!

  760. Vishnu says:

    Burkha Dutt is pathetic!

  761. Vishnu says:

    Burkha Dutt is pathetic!

  762. Vishnu says:

    Burkha Dutt is pathetic!

  763. Vishnu says:

    Burkha Dutt is pathetic!

  764. Vishnu says:

    Burkha Dutt is pathetic!

  765. Vishnu says:

    Burkha Dutt is pathetic!

  766. Vishnu says:

    Burkha Dutt is pathetic!

  767. Swati says:

    Barkha Dutt is really a cry baby! Someone please go and give her a change of diapers.. Barkha, get a life!

  768. Swati says:

    Barkha Dutt is really a cry baby! Someone please go and give her a change of diapers.. Barkha, get a life!

  769. Swati says:

    Barkha Dutt is really a cry baby! Someone please go and give her a change of diapers.. Barkha, get a life!

  770. Swati says:

    Barkha Dutt is really a cry baby! Someone please go and give her a change of diapers.. Barkha, get a life!

  771. Swati says:

    Barkha Dutt is really a cry baby! Someone please go and give her a change of diapers.. Barkha, get a life!

  772. Swati says:

    Barkha Dutt is really a cry baby! Someone please go and give her a change of diapers.. Barkha, get a life!

  773. Swati says:

    Barkha Dutt is really a cry baby! Someone please go and give her a change of diapers.. Barkha, get a life!

  774. Swati says:

    Barkha Dutt is really a cry baby! Someone please go and give her a change of diapers.. Barkha, get a life!

  775. Swati says:

    Barkha Dutt is really a cry baby! Someone please go and give her a change of diapers.. Barkha, get a life!

  776. Swati says:

    Barkha Dutt is really a cry baby! Someone please go and give her a change of diapers.. Barkha, get a life!

  777. chandni says:

    great post!

    Says everything I want to on this!!

    have done a post too

  778. chandni says:

    great post!

    Says everything I want to on this!!

    have done a post too

  779. chandni says:

    great post!

    Says everything I want to on this!!

    have done a post too

  780. chandni says:

    great post!

    Says everything I want to on this!!

    have done a post too

  781. chandni says:

    great post!

    Says everything I want to on this!!

    have done a post too

  782. chandni says:

    great post!

    Says everything I want to on this!!

    have done a post too

  783. chandni says:

    great post!

    Says everything I want to on this!!

    have done a post too

  784. chandni says:

    great post!

    Says everything I want to on this!!

    have done a post too

  785. chandni says:

    great post!

    Says everything I want to on this!!

    have done a post too

  786. chandni says:

    great post!

    Says everything I want to on this!!

    have done a post too

  787. Mallika says:

    Well said . I found Barkha Dutt's comments about bloggers totally irrelevant and immature .

  788. Mallika says:

    Well said . I found Barkha Dutt's comments about bloggers totally irrelevant and immature .

  789. Mallika says:

    Well said . I found Barkha Dutt's comments about bloggers totally irrelevant and immature .

  790. Mallika says:

    Well said . I found Barkha Dutt's comments about bloggers totally irrelevant and immature .

  791. Mallika says:

    Well said . I found Barkha Dutt's comments about bloggers totally irrelevant and immature .

  792. Mallika says:

    Well said . I found Barkha Dutt's comments about bloggers totally irrelevant and immature .

  793. Mallika says:

    Well said . I found Barkha Dutt's comments about bloggers totally irrelevant and immature .

  794. Mallika says:

    Well said . I found Barkha Dutt's comments about bloggers totally irrelevant and immature .

  795. Mallika says:

    Well said . I found Barkha Dutt's comments about bloggers totally irrelevant and immature .

  796. Mallika says:

    Well said . I found Barkha Dutt's comments about bloggers totally irrelevant and immature .

  797. Ankan says:

    I read the original post in the Google cache and I am still trying to find if there is anything libelous in that post. The only thing potentially libelous is a quote that the blogger provided from wikipedia. It is fair to say that he was not making the accusation directly but was quoting directly from an outside source.

    I know, it is easy for me to make these points than for the blogger who was served a legal notice from one of the largest media houses of India. However, it does make me feel that the media organization seems to have behaved extremely touchy if they have indeed threatened the original blogger. The self righteousness that their anchors so frequently show on the shows seems such a farce right now!

  798. Ankan says:

    I read the original post in the Google cache and I am still trying to find if there is anything libelous in that post. The only thing potentially libelous is a quote that the blogger provided from wikipedia. It is fair to say that he was not making the accusation directly but was quoting directly from an outside source.

    I know, it is easy for me to make these points than for the blogger who was served a legal notice from one of the largest media houses of India. However, it does make me feel that the media organization seems to have behaved extremely touchy if they have indeed threatened the original blogger. The self righteousness that their anchors so frequently show on the shows seems such a farce right now!

  799. Ankan says:

    I read the original post in the Google cache and I am still trying to find if there is anything libelous in that post. The only thing potentially libelous is a quote that the blogger provided from wikipedia. It is fair to say that he was not making the accusation directly but was quoting directly from an outside source.

    I know, it is easy for me to make these points than for the blogger who was served a legal notice from one of the largest media houses of India. However, it does make me feel that the media organization seems to have behaved extremely touchy if they have indeed threatened the original blogger. The self righteousness that their anchors so frequently show on the shows seems such a farce right now!

  800. Ankan says:

    I read the original post in the Google cache and I am still trying to find if there is anything libelous in that post. The only thing potentially libelous is a quote that the blogger provided from wikipedia. It is fair to say that he was not making the accusation directly but was quoting directly from an outside source.

    I know, it is easy for me to make these points than for the blogger who was served a legal notice from one of the largest media houses of India. However, it does make me feel that the media organization seems to have behaved extremely touchy if they have indeed threatened the original blogger. The self righteousness that their anchors so frequently show on the shows seems such a farce right now!

  801. Ankan says:

    I read the original post in the Google cache and I am still trying to find if there is anything libelous in that post. The only thing potentially libelous is a quote that the blogger provided from wikipedia. It is fair to say that he was not making the accusation directly but was quoting directly from an outside source.

    I know, it is easy for me to make these points than for the blogger who was served a legal notice from one of the largest media houses of India. However, it does make me feel that the media organization seems to have behaved extremely touchy if they have indeed threatened the original blogger. The self righteousness that their anchors so frequently show on the shows seems such a farce right now!

  802. Ankan says:

    I read the original post in the Google cache and I am still trying to find if there is anything libelous in that post. The only thing potentially libelous is a quote that the blogger provided from wikipedia. It is fair to say that he was not making the accusation directly but was quoting directly from an outside source.

    I know, it is easy for me to make these points than for the blogger who was served a legal notice from one of the largest media houses of India. However, it does make me feel that the media organization seems to have behaved extremely touchy if they have indeed threatened the original blogger. The self righteousness that their anchors so frequently show on the shows seems such a farce right now!

  803. Ankan says:

    I read the original post in the Google cache and I am still trying to find if there is anything libelous in that post. The only thing potentially libelous is a quote that the blogger provided from wikipedia. It is fair to say that he was not making the accusation directly but was quoting directly from an outside source.

    I know, it is easy for me to make these points than for the blogger who was served a legal notice from one of the largest media houses of India. However, it does make me feel that the media organization seems to have behaved extremely touchy if they have indeed threatened the original blogger. The self righteousness that their anchors so frequently show on the shows seems such a farce right now!

  804. Ankan says:

    I read the original post in the Google cache and I am still trying to find if there is anything libelous in that post. The only thing potentially libelous is a quote that the blogger provided from wikipedia. It is fair to say that he was not making the accusation directly but was quoting directly from an outside source.

    I know, it is easy for me to make these points than for the blogger who was served a legal notice from one of the largest media houses of India. However, it does make me feel that the media organization seems to have behaved extremely touchy if they have indeed threatened the original blogger. The self righteousness that their anchors so frequently show on the shows seems such a farce right now!

  805. Ankan says:

    I read the original post in the Google cache and I am still trying to find if there is anything libelous in that post. The only thing potentially libelous is a quote that the blogger provided from wikipedia. It is fair to say that he was not making the accusation directly but was quoting directly from an outside source.

    I know, it is easy for me to make these points than for the blogger who was served a legal notice from one of the largest media houses of India. However, it does make me feel that the media organization seems to have behaved extremely touchy if they have indeed threatened the original blogger. The self righteousness that their anchors so frequently show on the shows seems such a farce right now!

  806. Ankan says:

    I read the original post in the Google cache and I am still trying to find if there is anything libelous in that post. The only thing potentially libelous is a quote that the blogger provided from wikipedia. It is fair to say that he was not making the accusation directly but was quoting directly from an outside source.

    I know, it is easy for me to make these points than for the blogger who was served a legal notice from one of the largest media houses of India. However, it does make me feel that the media organization seems to have behaved extremely touchy if they have indeed threatened the original blogger. The self righteousness that their anchors so frequently show on the shows seems such a farce right now!

  807. These NDTV guys are absolute idiots.

  808. These NDTV guys are absolute idiots.

  809. These NDTV guys are absolute idiots.

  810. These NDTV guys are absolute idiots.

  811. These NDTV guys are absolute idiots.

  812. These NDTV guys are absolute idiots.

  813. These NDTV guys are absolute idiots.

  814. These NDTV guys are absolute idiots.

  815. These NDTV guys are absolute idiots.

  816. These NDTV guys are absolute idiots.

  817. I think you are Mrs.Dutt friend..gud luck ..

  818. I think you are Mrs.Dutt friend..gud luck ..

  819. I think you are Mrs.Dutt friend..gud luck ..

  820. I think you are Mrs.Dutt friend..gud luck ..

  821. I think you are Mrs.Dutt friend..gud luck ..

  822. I think you are Mrs.Dutt friend..gud luck ..

  823. I think you are Mrs.Dutt friend..gud luck ..

  824. I think you are Mrs.Dutt friend..gud luck ..

  825. I think you are Mrs.Dutt friend..gud luck ..

  826. I think you are Mrs.Dutt friend..gud luck ..

  827. KiranP says:

    GREAT JOKE CALLED INDIAN MEDIA – CNN_IBN, NDTV types

    http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/01/29/hindu-ho

  828. KiranP says:

    GREAT JOKE CALLED INDIAN MEDIA – CNN_IBN, NDTV types

    http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/01/29/hindu-ho

  829. KiranP says:

    GREAT JOKE CALLED INDIAN MEDIA – CNN_IBN, NDTV types

    http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/01/29/hindu-ho

  830. KiranP says:

    GREAT JOKE CALLED INDIAN MEDIA – CNN_IBN, NDTV types

    http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/01/29/hindu-ho

  831. KiranP says:

    GREAT JOKE CALLED INDIAN MEDIA – CNN_IBN, NDTV types

    http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/01/29/hindu-ho

  832. KiranP says:

    GREAT JOKE CALLED INDIAN MEDIA – CNN_IBN, NDTV types

    http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/01/29/hindu-ho

  833. KiranP says:

    GREAT JOKE CALLED INDIAN MEDIA – CNN_IBN, NDTV types

    http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/01/29/hindu-ho

  834. KiranP says:

    GREAT JOKE CALLED INDIAN MEDIA – CNN_IBN, NDTV types

    http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/01/29/hindu-ho

  835. KiranP says:

    GREAT JOKE CALLED INDIAN MEDIA – CNN_IBN, NDTV types

    http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/01/29/hindu-ho

  836. KiranP says:

    GREAT JOKE CALLED INDIAN MEDIA – CNN_IBN, NDTV types

    http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/01/29/hindu-ho

  837. Dr Zen says:

    Now that the dust has settled down….

    “Power and Monopoly
    This is danger
    Until you have it..”

    Barksha Dutt, Rajdeep Sardesai and many of the english speaking journalists are the entities having misappropriate powers sadely they dont know how to control, they dont even know what exactly their purpose is..

    Are these guys government blackmailers, are these people the lawmakers of the country, are these people supposed to enlighten people, are these people politicos in making?? Galore…!!

    A duty of any kind of journalist is just to put up a news or an event in front of people without altering its meaning or without adding his or her own view in it..

    What do we see?

    “Nothing is evil
    nothing is bad
    If you get paid for it..”

    In India, journalists for some reasons believe that they have got an uncontrolled power to speak,write and say anything and everything..On top of it, commercial news channels are busy 'creating' news. Ok, I agree that this new found sector of news channels will take some time to mature, but how long do we have to wait?

    “One month passed by
    Mumbai moves on
    Perils of democracy…”

    What did we see on 26/11 attacks? The TV media became the eyes of terrorists..If it hadent for some brave men, a handful of terrorists actually managed to control the Indian commercial capital..why did it happen?

    Again, uncontrolled power…the media made a reality show out of it. I thank God that there were no sms competitions held like

    ' Which terrorist is the deadliest'
    1. Ajaml Kasab
    2. Lalu Yadav
    3. Amar Singh

    My dear blogger friends.

    We have got great responsibility on our hands, so many challenges lie ahead of us, we want to build an entire nation, we have to transform enslaved mentality people into confident and faithful, loyal citizens..Its a task we cant leave for politicos nor these journalists..

    Lets not get arrogant like those journos..We are bloggers, Its our space, we will use it for our good purpose and not for mongering around like TV channels…

    I hope we will ignore poor souls like Barkha Dutt, Rajdeep Sardesai, Sagarika Ghosh and all the news channels funded by western money..

    PS- All haiku are written by me,Dr Zen. If you want to copy it somewhere,just tell me, you wont need to pay me money, however, commercial use of haiku s prohibited unless you send me a hefty cheque. ;)_

    This comment is under creative commons, Haikus (c) Dr Zen.

  838. Dr Zen says:

    Now that the dust has settled down….

    “Power and Monopoly
    This is danger
    Until you have it..”

    Barksha Dutt, Rajdeep Sardesai and many of the english speaking journalists are the entities having misappropriate powers sadely they dont know how to control, they dont even know what exactly their purpose is..

    Are these guys government blackmailers, are these people the lawmakers of the country, are these people supposed to enlighten people, are these people politicos in making?? Galore…!!

    A duty of any kind of journalist is just to put up a news or an event in front of people without altering its meaning or without adding his or her own view in it..

    What do we see?

    “Nothing is evil
    nothing is bad
    If you get paid for it..”

    In India, journalists for some reasons believe that they have got an uncontrolled power to speak,write and say anything and everything..On top of it, commercial news channels are busy 'creating' news. Ok, I agree that this new found sector of news channels will take some time to mature, but how long do we have to wait?

    “One month passed by
    Mumbai moves on
    Perils of democracy…”

    What did we see on 26/11 attacks? The TV media became the eyes of terrorists..If it hadent for some brave men, a handful of terrorists actually managed to control the Indian commercial capital..why did it happen?

    Again, uncontrolled power…the media made a reality show out of it. I thank God that there were no sms competitions held like

    ' Which terrorist is the deadliest'
    1. Ajaml Kasab
    2. Lalu Yadav
    3. Amar Singh

    My dear blogger friends.

    We have got great responsibility on our hands, so many challenges lie ahead of us, we want to build an entire nation, we have to transform enslaved mentality people into confident and faithful, loyal citizens..Its a task we cant leave for politicos nor these journalists..

    Lets not get arrogant like those journos..We are bloggers, Its our space, we will use it for our good purpose and not for mongering around like TV channels…

    I hope we will ignore poor souls like Barkha Dutt, Rajdeep Sardesai, Sagarika Ghosh and all the news channels funded by western money..

    PS- All haiku are written by me,Dr Zen. If you want to copy it somewhere,just tell me, you wont need to pay me money, however, commercial use of haiku s prohibited unless you send me a hefty cheque. ;)_

    This comment is under creative commons, Haikus (c) Dr Zen.

  839. Dr Zen says:

    Now that the dust has settled down….

    “Power and Monopoly
    This is danger
    Until you have it..”

    Barksha Dutt, Rajdeep Sardesai and many of the english speaking journalists are the entities having misappropriate powers sadely they dont know how to control, they dont even know what exactly their purpose is..

    Are these guys government blackmailers, are these people the lawmakers of the country, are these people supposed to enlighten people, are these people politicos in making?? Galore…!!

    A duty of any kind of journalist is just to put up a news or an event in front of people without altering its meaning or without adding his or her own view in it..

    What do we see?

    “Nothing is evil
    nothing is bad
    If you get paid for it..”

    In India, journalists for some reasons believe that they have got an uncontrolled power to speak,write and say anything and everything..On top of it, commercial news channels are busy 'creating' news. Ok, I agree that this new found sector of news channels will take some time to mature, but how long do we have to wait?

    “One month passed by
    Mumbai moves on
    Perils of democracy…”

    What did we see on 26/11 attacks? The TV media became the eyes of terrorists..If it hadent for some brave men, a handful of terrorists actually managed to control the Indian commercial capital..why did it happen?

    Again, uncontrolled power…the media made a reality show out of it. I thank God that there were no sms competitions held like

    ' Which terrorist is the deadliest'
    1. Ajaml Kasab
    2. Lalu Yadav
    3. Amar Singh

    My dear blogger friends.

    We have got great responsibility on our hands, so many challenges lie ahead of us, we want to build an entire nation, we have to transform enslaved mentality people into confident and faithful, loyal citizens..Its a task we cant leave for politicos nor these journalists..

    Lets not get arrogant like those journos..We are bloggers, Its our space, we will use it for our good purpose and not for mongering around like TV channels…

    I hope we will ignore poor souls like Barkha Dutt, Rajdeep Sardesai, Sagarika Ghosh and all the news channels funded by western money..

    PS- All haiku are written by me,Dr Zen. If you want to copy it somewhere,just tell me, you wont need to pay me money, however, commercial use of haiku s prohibited unless you send me a hefty cheque. ;)_

    This comment is under creative commons, Haikus (c) Dr Zen.

  840. Dr Zen says:

    Now that the dust has settled down….

    “Power and Monopoly
    This is danger
    Until you have it..”

    Barksha Dutt, Rajdeep Sardesai and many of the english speaking journalists are the entities having misappropriate powers sadely they dont know how to control, they dont even know what exactly their purpose is..

    Are these guys government blackmailers, are these people the lawmakers of the country, are these people supposed to enlighten people, are these people politicos in making?? Galore…!!

    A duty of any kind of journalist is just to put up a news or an event in front of people without altering its meaning or without adding his or her own view in it..

    What do we see?

    “Nothing is evil
    nothing is bad
    If you get paid for it..”

    In India, journalists for some reasons believe that they have got an uncontrolled power to speak,write and say anything and everything..On top of it, commercial news channels are busy 'creating' news. Ok, I agree that this new found sector of news channels will take some time to mature, but how long do we have to wait?

    “One month passed by
    Mumbai moves on
    Perils of democracy…”

    What did we see on 26/11 attacks? The TV media became the eyes of terrorists..If it hadent for some brave men, a handful of terrorists actually managed to control the Indian commercial capital..why did it happen?

    Again, uncontrolled power…the media made a reality show out of it. I thank God that there were no sms competitions held like

    ' Which terrorist is the deadliest'
    1. Ajaml Kasab
    2. Lalu Yadav
    3. Amar Singh

    My dear blogger friends.

    We have got great responsibility on our hands, so many challenges lie ahead of us, we want to build an entire nation, we have to transform enslaved mentality people into confident and faithful, loyal citizens..Its a task we cant leave for politicos nor these journalists..

    Lets not get arrogant like those journos..We are bloggers, Its our space, we will use it for our good purpose and not for mongering around like TV channels…

    I hope we will ignore poor souls like Barkha Dutt, Rajdeep Sardesai, Sagarika Ghosh and all the news channels funded by western money..

    PS- All haiku are written by me,Dr Zen. If you want to copy it somewhere,just tell me, you wont need to pay me money, however, commercial use of haiku s prohibited unless you send me a hefty cheque. ;)_

    This comment is under creative commons, Haikus (c) Dr Zen.

  841. Dr Zen says:

    Now that the dust has settled down….

    “Power and Monopoly
    This is danger
    Until you have it..”

    Barksha Dutt, Rajdeep Sardesai and many of the english speaking journalists are the entities having misappropriate powers sadely they dont know how to control, they dont even know what exactly their purpose is..

    Are these guys government blackmailers, are these people the lawmakers of the country, are these people supposed to enlighten people, are these people politicos in making?? Galore…!!

    A duty of any kind of journalist is just to put up a news or an event in front of people without altering its meaning or without adding his or her own view in it..

    What do we see?

    “Nothing is evil
    nothing is bad
    If you get paid for it..”

    In India, journalists for some reasons believe that they have got an uncontrolled power to speak,write and say anything and everything..On top of it, commercial news channels are busy 'creating' news. Ok, I agree that this new found sector of news channels will take some time to mature, but how long do we have to wait?

    “One month passed by
    Mumbai moves on
    Perils of democracy…”

    What did we see on 26/11 attacks? The TV media became the eyes of terrorists..If it hadent for some brave men, a handful of terrorists actually managed to control the Indian commercial capital..why did it happen?

    Again, uncontrolled power…the media made a reality show out of it. I thank God that there were no sms competitions held like

    ' Which terrorist is the deadliest'
    1. Ajaml Kasab
    2. Lalu Yadav
    3. Amar Singh

    My dear blogger friends.

    We have got great responsibility on our hands, so many challenges lie ahead of us, we want to build an entire nation, we have to transform enslaved mentality people into confident and faithful, loyal citizens..Its a task we cant leave for politicos nor these journalists..

    Lets not get arrogant like those journos..We are bloggers, Its our space, we will use it for our good purpose and not for mongering around like TV channels…

    I hope we will ignore poor souls like Barkha Dutt, Rajdeep Sardesai, Sagarika Ghosh and all the news channels funded by western money..

    PS- All haiku are written by me,Dr Zen. If you want to copy it somewhere,just tell me, you wont need to pay me money, however, commercial use of haiku s prohibited unless you send me a hefty cheque. ;)_

    This comment is under creative commons, Haikus (c) Dr Zen.

  842. Dr Zen says:

    Now that the dust has settled down….

    “Power and Monopoly
    This is danger
    Until you have it..”

    Barksha Dutt, Rajdeep Sardesai and many of the english speaking journalists are the entities having misappropriate powers sadely they dont know how to control, they dont even know what exactly their purpose is..

    Are these guys government blackmailers, are these people the lawmakers of the country, are these people supposed to enlighten people, are these people politicos in making?? Galore…!!

    A duty of any kind of journalist is just to put up a news or an event in front of people without altering its meaning or without adding his or her own view in it..

    What do we see?

    “Nothing is evil
    nothing is bad
    If you get paid for it..”

    In India, journalists for some reasons believe that they have got an uncontr