<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How any large company can blow it.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shripriya.com/blog/2007/01/17/how-any-large-company-can-blow-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shripriya.com/blog/2007/01/17/how-any-large-company-can-blow-it/</link>
	<description>Random Musings. Imaginary readers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 08:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shripriya</title>
		<link>http://shripriya.com/blog/2007/01/17/how-any-large-company-can-blow-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2418</link>
		<dc:creator>Shripriya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shripriya.com/blog/2007/01/17/how-any-large-company-can-blow-it/#comment-2418</guid>
		<description>@ DrDoubt - clearly, Yahoo has a lot of stuff going for it. However, my post was as much about how *any* large company can let the sheer size (and issues that come with that size) let an opportunity pass it by and I used Yahoo as an example to prove that point. 

The thing they messed up was the launch of Panama, not passing on Google. I am sure we can all agree that it would have been in their best interest to have had it a long time ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ DrDoubt &#8211; clearly, Yahoo has a lot of stuff going for it. However, my post was as much about how *any* large company can let the sheer size (and issues that come with that size) let an opportunity pass it by and I used Yahoo as an example to prove that point. </p>
<p>The thing they messed up was the launch of Panama, not passing on Google. I am sure we can all agree that it would have been in their best interest to have had it a long time ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drdoubt</title>
		<link>http://shripriya.com/blog/2007/01/17/how-any-large-company-can-blow-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2412</link>
		<dc:creator>drdoubt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shripriya.com/blog/2007/01/17/how-any-large-company-can-blow-it/#comment-2412</guid>
		<description>Yahoo is a terrific company. Its easy to write articles and blog posts saying they blew it - after the sky becomes clear after the web2.0 metoo clouds move away, yahoo&#039;s efforts will become visible and clear. 

Yahoo has done only one mistake so far : not buying out disney in 99 when they had the market cap to do so. not buying google was not a mistake: that could never have happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo is a terrific company. Its easy to write articles and blog posts saying they blew it &#8211; after the sky becomes clear after the web2.0 metoo clouds move away, yahoo&#8217;s efforts will become visible and clear. </p>
<p>Yahoo has done only one mistake so far : not buying out disney in 99 when they had the market cap to do so. not buying google was not a mistake: that could never have happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shripriya</title>
		<link>http://shripriya.com/blog/2007/01/17/how-any-large-company-can-blow-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2381</link>
		<dc:creator>Shripriya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shripriya.com/blog/2007/01/17/how-any-large-company-can-blow-it/#comment-2381</guid>
		<description>Oh, come on, Forth Ump, give us some good info. No one will know - this blog only has imaginary readers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, come on, Forth Ump, give us some good info. No one will know &#8211; this blog only has imaginary readers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fourth Umpire</title>
		<link>http://shripriya.com/blog/2007/01/17/how-any-large-company-can-blow-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2368</link>
		<dc:creator>Fourth Umpire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 05:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shripriya.com/blog/2007/01/17/how-any-large-company-can-blow-it/#comment-2368</guid>
		<description>All I&#039;ll say is that I lived the birth and gestation of Panama, and I left Yahoo in 2005.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I&#8217;ll say is that I lived the birth and gestation of Panama, and I left Yahoo in 2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Jongleur</title>
		<link>http://shripriya.com/blog/2007/01/17/how-any-large-company-can-blow-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2307</link>
		<dc:creator>The Jongleur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 01:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shripriya.com/blog/2007/01/17/how-any-large-company-can-blow-it/#comment-2307</guid>
		<description>The problem with yahoo is not that it did too little - it did too much and ended up caving under the weight of its own portfolio. It just  - wanted to be everyone at the same time - content provider, search king, portal monarch, job shop, tax advisor, ISP (??, pop vending machine  ad infinitum. Probably sticking to what it did best (being the starting block for users on the web) could have been the best tonic for all these problems. Google took the opposite route - worked really hard at being the best in one arena (search) that drove users to look into alternative (though eminently forgettable) offerings from Google. You are right - Yahoo had no singular definitive killer app that uprooted the world off its axis - it just tried being the Jack of a million trades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with yahoo is not that it did too little &#8211; it did too much and ended up caving under the weight of its own portfolio. It just  &#8211; wanted to be everyone at the same time &#8211; content provider, search king, portal monarch, job shop, tax advisor, ISP (??, pop vending machine  ad infinitum. Probably sticking to what it did best (being the starting block for users on the web) could have been the best tonic for all these problems. Google took the opposite route &#8211; worked really hard at being the best in one arena (search) that drove users to look into alternative (though eminently forgettable) offerings from Google. You are right &#8211; Yahoo had no singular definitive killer app that uprooted the world off its axis &#8211; it just tried being the Jack of a million trades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

